Author Topic: Nienhaus linking child research on tinychat  (Read 89851 times)

Really? I post a paper published by loving psychologytoday with actual data showing that furries are animal forgeters, and all the furries just completely ignore it?

I have no reason to be surprised.

You're in a punching match with a person who denies hes being punched, just roll with it

And your opinions on the vileness of bestiality are invalid because you, and everyone else defending furry, like plugging dog butts with your snake.
No, nonono, you have it all wrong! Vincent is attracted to BIRD butts, not dog butts! Gosh, why do you always mix the two up?

Really? I post a paper published by loving psychologytoday with actual data showing that furries are animal forgeters, and all the furries just completely ignore it?

I have no reason to be surprised.

The key word is all.

And your opinions on the vileness of bestiality are invalid because you, and everyone else defending furry, like plugging dog butts with your snake.
Whoa there buddy

No, nonono, you have it all wrong! Vincent is attracted to BIRD butts, not dog butts! Gosh, why do you always mix the two up?

Now you're just being passive aggressive

wait so let's say that this same guy just liked drawing animals doing human things like playing poker and taking out the trash and had other artist friends who liked animal art too and talked about it a lot when they discussed art together

does that mean that they liked to forget eachother while wearing animal pelt rugs??

No, nonono, you have it all wrong! Vincent is attracted to BIRD butts, not dog butts! Gosh, why do you always mix the two up?
oh hey

that's better, finally at least slight admittance (about furries yiffing) has been said! thanks.

wait so let's say that this same guy just liked drawing animals doing human things like playing poker and taking out the trash and had other artist friends who liked animal art too and talked about it a lot when they discussed art together

does that mean that they liked to forget eachother while wearing animal pelt rugs??
Yes because Otis, Thompson, and Stocking are always right, they're never wrong, ever. Right?

wait so let's say that this same guy just liked drawing animals doing human things like playing poker and taking out the trash and had other artist friends who liked animal art too and talked about it a lot when they discussed art together

does that mean that they liked to forget eachother while wearing animal pelt rugs??
no, see disney.

wait so let's say that this same guy just liked drawing animals doing human things like playing poker and taking out the trash and had other artist friends who liked animal art too and talked about it a lot when they discussed art together

does that mean that they liked to forget eachother while wearing animal pelt rugs??

Yes, animal art was completely common back in the day, and they had huge animal drawing conventions too!

Yes because Otis, Thompson, and Stocking are always right, they're never wrong, ever. Right?
I don't know about Thompson but you've got the other two right.

Yes because Otis, Thompson, and Stocking are always right, they're never wrong, ever. Right?
People are never wrong!

Calling me a troll to comfort yourself is just sad.
When it's true, does it mean i'm fursecuting you?

Really? I post a paper published by loving psychologytoday with actual data showing that furries are animal forgeters, and all the furries just completely ignore it?

I have no reason to be surprised.
Because 20% of a small crowd in a small area is totally a lot of people.

And your opinions on the vileness of bestiality are invalid because you, and everyone else defending furry, like plugging dog butts with your snake.
And back to bestiality and carrot jokes.

No, nonono, you have it all wrong! Vincent is attracted to BIRD butts, not dog butts! Gosh, why do you always mix the two up?
And there's the reassuring bird joke.

We are actually going in a circle. Almost perfectly.

This drama has been derailed so much it's not even funny. It'd be awesome if it split at the point where this all started so we could go back to making Nien feel bad.


wait so let's say that this same guy just liked drawing animals doing human things like playing poker and taking out the trash and had other artist friends who liked animal art too and talked about it a lot when they discussed art together

does that mean that they liked to forget eachother while wearing animal pelt rugs??

why the forget are you repeating this stupid argument over and over again when it was ignored the first 3 times you pushed it? the guy who made the 'dogs playing poker' comic never said he was a furry, he didnt claim to be a fan of anthropomorphic animals. he drew them playing poker because the idea of dog's playing poker was absurdist humor, he was in no way trying to contribute to a "furry fandom"

i mean god damn shut your stupid loving face if youre going to push idiotic arguments like that.

Because 20% of a small crowd in a small area is totally a lot of people.

having 20% of a crowd of 700 people ADMIT to loving animals is a huge deal. are you really not capable of understanding the implications of 1/5 of your community being willing to go on record for boning animals?

Yes, animal art was completely common back in the day, and they had huge animal drawing conventions too!
but if you put it into modern context the artist and his friends would be considered furries and labeled at the same low and horrible depths as furry research artists (not being sarcastic either because it's a repulsive thing)