Author Topic: Nienhaus linking child research on tinychat  (Read 89913 times)

you see, the difference is that anime girls aren't dogsMaybe because instead of actually having humility you act like there's nothing wrong with it and continue on your marry way?

yeah I don't know why there's virtually an infinite amount of anime child research, everyone who watches anime has children is obviously a child enthusiast.


Way to hop on the bandwagon. That same, tacked-on "furys forget dogs hahahaha" argument that has been posted so many times it's not even funny.

Oh, and furries were, at the beginning, based around cartoony characters. A quick google search can save a life.

except furries are a documented loveual paraphilia, http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-excess/201309/animal-instincts

is it a coincidence that you just so happen to be obsessed with the subject of real, widespread paraphilia? i mean it isnt like youre obsessed with something mundane and specific like, indo-germanic winter fashion. you're obsessed with the loveualization of animals. hell, even in  Dr. Mark D. Griffiths' poll nearly 20% admitted to loving animals. we know that people lie, and that it's pretty obvious that there were a whole lot more who just werent ballsy enough to admit that "screwing the pooch" was more than just a figure of speech for them

yeah I don't know why there's virtually an infinite amount of anime research, everyone who watches anime is obviously a child enthusiast.

a huge part of the appeal of anime, as ive said before, is the fact that the women are physically perfect. looking at research of perfect adult women isnt something you brag about, but i wouldn't consider it deplorable.

now you've just changed the argument to the point of irrelevance.
who cares, the argument that was going on here in the first place isn't even relevant to the OP.
are you just that desperate to fight a fight that neither of us can win?


The thing is, this is a forum, a forum of people i've never met before.

I am not taking any of this personally or to heart because we've never actually met, let alone do we know one another personally. I don't take tough guys or trolls on the internet seriously, it's not healthy.

if a furry is anyone technically by definition just enjoys art depicting animals conveying human traits but is by popular definition a zoophile does that mean that the guy who made the famous "dogs playing poker" painting was a rabid animal forgeter

saying furrys are a fandom not a special interest is like justin bieber saying being a belieber is a lifestyle

if a furry is anyone technically by definition just enjoys art depicting animals conveying human traits but is by popular definition a zoophile does that mean that the guy who made the famous "dogs playing poker" painting was a rabid animal forgeter
Absolutely!, There is no exception and anyone who makes a rendition of anthropomorphized animals are rabid animal forgeters!

if a furry is anyone technically by definition just enjoys art depicting animals conveying human traits but is by popular definition a zoophile does that mean that the guy who made the famous "dogs playing poker" painting was a rabid animal forgeter
the guy who painted dogs playing poker didn't dedicate his life to the dog "fandom" and post in dog "fandom" threads every day
stop trying to compare completely different stuff

The thing is, this is a forum, a forum of people i've never met before.

I am not taking any of this personally or to heart because we've never actually met, let alone do we know one another personally. I don't take tough guys or trolls on the internet seriously, it's not healthy.

So, you're saying my opinions are invalid because I posted them on the internet

the guy who painted dogs playing poker didn't dedicate his life to the dog "fandom" and post in dog "fandom" threads every day
stop trying to compare completely different stuff

So, you're saying my opinions are invalid because I posted them on the internet
They're also invalid because you have a long history of trolling and constant harassment of other users. But whatever.

I don't take tough guys or trolls on the internet seriously
look, it's this again! gosh, i'm starting to wonder if most furries are just one person?

They're also invalid because you have a long history of trolling and constant harassment of other users. But whatever.

Calling me a troll to comfort yourself is just sad.

Really? I post a paper published by loving psychologytoday with actual data showing that furries are animal forgeters, and all the furries just completely ignore it?

I have no reason to be surprised.

They're also invalid because you have a long history of trolling and constant harassment of other users. But whatever.
And your opinions on the vileness of bestiality are invalid because you, and everyone else defending furry, like plugging dog butts with your snake.

Really? I post a paper published by loving psychologytoday with actual data showing that furries are animal forgeters, and all the furries just completely ignore it?
BECUS IT WAS BIAS I BET UR tribal TO