Author Topic: post your favorite aircraft  (Read 3125 times)

wtf is that some american gay flying stuff
go away commie noob

I took this picture


And some roosterpit pics with some body parts in the reflections (oops sorry)

mig-25 is better, almost same speed (mach 3.3 vs mach 3.2, not really much) but is also able to carry some kind of weapons

The SR-71 was still able to out-run the MiG-25, and in its time, was able to evade the majority of surface-to-air missiles by simply going faster than them. Not to mention the fact that the MiG-25 and the SR-71 fit two different roles. The SR-71 is a reconnaissance vehicle with (limited and out-dated) stealth capabilities, the MiG-25 is an interceptor craft. You're comparing apples and oranges here.

wtf is that some american gay flying stuff

You sound upset.


The Lightning II is loving adorable look at that

Mikoyan 1.44 Flatpack
Tupolev Tu-95
Tupolev Tu-160
MiG-25
P-47D
P-36
Antonov An-224
A-10C
wtf is that some american gay flying stuff
That's a Su-32?

That's a Su-32?
its not
he even clearly stated that its fictional

Turns out that commercial/civilian aircraft don't exist. No idea about everyone else but I am completely unfazed and uninterested by they-almost-always-look-the-same fighter jets.

So yeah enjoy.




but I am completely unfazed and uninterested by they-almost-always-look-the-same fighter jets.
kind of a stupid statement since passenger jets look even more the same than fighter jets...

kind of a stupid statement since passenger jets look even more the same than fighter jets...
No not... really..

kind of a stupid statement since passenger jets look even more the same than fighter jets...
true. but fighter jets don't even look good to me. passenger jets are lovey.


passenger jets can have some cool designs on them

No not... really..
only difference I see in like 90% of passenger jets is just barely in the wings, fuselage length and nose shape

only difference I see in like 90% of passenger jets is just barely in the wings, fuselage length and nose shape
Try Wing shape, Wing location, engine location, Tail location, Engine type, etc.

And almost all Boeings have the same nose shape. Your point is invalid.

its not
he even clearly stated that its fictional

Yeah. At second glance now I realize it's missing a few features.

Try Wing shape, Wing location, engine location, Tail location, Engine type, etc.

And almost all Boeings have the same nose shape. Your point is invalid.
OK, but to say that fighter jets look more alike than passenger jets is just ridiculous