Poll

Steam authentication, for a one-time, lifetime payment of $10?

Yes
No
Do more research to find a way to do it with a SteamID
Hire somebody else (for a reward) to find a way to do it with a SteamID

Author Topic: Steam authentication for HammerHost  (Read 9958 times)


In case you didn't already know, my new hosting service, HammerHost, is going to start the closed beta stage on March 10, and probably release publicly 1 week after. This means I need to find a VPS provider in 3 days. Unfortunately, I do not know what the community would like and if you're okay with one in Europe.
EDIT: Servermania has been picked.

I've now finally chosen Servermania

Initial specifications of the VPS: (I will get a more powerful VPS or dedicated server depending on HammerHost's popularity).
CPU: 4 cores of an Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
RAM: 4 GB
Estimated Blockland capacity: 10 servers


Should Steam authentication be brought back?
When I started making HammerHost (right on the day Ephialtes quit), I decided to implement Steam authentication for the service. This would allow many users to purchase a server.
However, I found out that it is against the Steam terms of service for a user to distribute their Steam username and password. I was quite disappointed that Steam authentication for multiple dedi-servers was impossible without Badspot's intervention. Non-developers can only access the Steam web API.

But today, I re-thought the issue, and came up with a workaround:
Option A: Allow HammerHost clients to pay extra for Steam accounts.
This method definitely does not violate any Steam or Blockland licensing agreements. It works by using a unique Steam account for each Blockland server:

When the client registers and chooses Steam authentication, they pay a one-time fee of $10 (in addition to the monthly or 3-month price), and specify what Blockland username they want. I use the money to create a brand-new Steam account, and buy a new copy of Blockland on it. After that, I run Blockland for the first time and change the username from "Blockhead######" to the username the client specified earlier. Then I make their HammerHost account use the Steam account's credentials. I will never give the client the Steam account's credentials because it is not allowed.
This new Steam account lasts for life. This means if they don't want to pay anymore and quit, they don't have to pay the $10 again once they rejoin.

Option B will come after once I find out if it's legal.


« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 08:32:44 AM by Hammereditor5 »

so porkhost is coming back
I wonder how far it's gonna get

let's hope it doesn't get any malware for some reason

I'm more for servermania.

let's hope it doesn't get any malware for some reason
It wasn't actually malware. It was just a UDP-IP-spoofing-chargen attack which was solved quickly, and posed no consequences.




Bandwidth?
Upload speed and monthly bandwidth isn't very relevant here, but Servermania will probably have 100 Mbps port and it has a 4 TB monthly limit.
Contabo has unlimited monthly transfer with a 1 Gbps port, but it will cap you to 10 Mbps if your average is higher than 40 Mbps.
When I ran HamHost, the speed tests for Contabo showed 350 Mbps download and 90 Mbps upload.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2014, 04:49:58 PM by Hammereditor5 »


cheaper > better
40 bucks? really?
I highly doubt those are the client prices. That's just how much it would cost Hammereditor a month to use those servers

40 bucks? really?
This is the cost of the VPS, not for my hosting service.
The price of HammerHost will be $5/month.

This is the cost of the VPS, not for my hosting service.
The price of HammerHost will be $5/month.

If I'm going to pay for this, I want my own layout and ftp. Having to go through that crappy layout that didn't work was really bad.

If I'm going to pay for this, I want my own layout and ftp. Having to go through that crappy layout that didn't work was really bad.
Nope, the new control panel is many times better than the stupid one HamHost used. When I started making HammerHost 3 weeks ago, I laughed at how horribly the HamHost control panel was constructed. What an excuse for a control panel.

The new one will be web-based and can be accessed from any electronic device.

can be accessed from any electronic device.

so can my toaster use this panel