Vim or Nano
vim all the way, i should publish my vim/pathogen dotfiles :U
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/tmux
fixed
i'm using both zsh and tmux :3
Hey there, nano is a fantastic editor. Would you rather be using ed? Just because it's basic doesn't make it bad.
nano is hard for doing anything serious with though…
Where do I put tmux.bar :s
Figured that out, but it still does not look anything like that :(
you put .tmux.conf and .tmux.bar in ~
also make sure .tmux.bar is executable
nix's tmux config inspired me to fiddle around with it again
-snippy-
i like it so far, im probably gonna have to mess around with term colors and stuff to get everything to look nice
tmux is great, it's like the best tiling window manager you could ever have
but i still need GUI applications so i use tmux in xmonad :p
if i didn't, i would go full-on tmux in fbterm
"a lot" meaning hardly ever
You could try gedit. If you're on Arch though, good luck because 3.12 just came out in [core], gedit looks totally different.
before i became a full-time vim addict, i've used gedit for quite a few years
it's a pretty great editor, imo, but but but vim
also, wayland anyone? :D

wayland's great, i hope it crushes mir (mark shuttleworth pls stop forcing people to suck your richard)