Mods are asleep; post CP

[Decepticon]

mods are asleep again

[Ad Bot]

[SeventhSandwich]

[Camel]

more like chloro-BLASTS

[Camel]

more like chloro-BLASTS

camel prose

[Maxwell.]

more like chloro-BLASTS

that is CB, not CP, please die

[Buu]

crappy pastas

[Camel]

that is CB, not CP, please die

chill, pleb

[Steve5451²]

Often? Do you know how often people post child research when mods are asleep?

And anyways, posting Child research is really illegal and you would truly see it only on a deepweb forum, so assuming that its Child research is stupid. It has to be something else.

umm there's a "mods are asleep, post cp" thread on 4chan at least three times a day.

[Maxwell.]

chill, pleb

stop this you are hurting me

[Night Fox]

Often? Do you know how often people post child research when mods are asleep?
And anyways, posting Child research is really illegal and you would truly see it only on a deepweb forum, so assuming that its Child research is stupid. It has to be something else.

ffs. OP intended for people to think of child research. did you come in this thread expecting specifically civil protection? the answer is no. that means it is ambiguous
it is a fact that it is ambiguous. it isn't debatable

[TristanLuigi]

ffs. OP intended for people to think of child research. did you come in this thread expecting specifically civil protection? the answer is no. that means it is ambiguous
it is a fact that it is ambiguous. it isn't debatable

it is
but that's the joke and I don't really think it's ambiguous in a bad way I mean come on

[Buu]

ffs. OP intended for people to think of child research. did you come in this thread expecting specifically civil protection? the answer is no. that means it is ambiguous
it is a fact that it is ambiguous. it isn't debatable

maybe it was joke that gets revealed in the op?

he wasn't banned so it's not ambiguous

[SeventhSandwich]

ffs. OP intended for people to think of child research. did you come in this thread expecting specifically civil protection? the answer is no. that means it is ambiguous
it is a fact that it is ambiguous. it isn't debatable

That's really stretching it. The whole "no ambiguous posts" rule is just to make sure that we don't end up with a board with so many threads titled 'Look at this!", "cool thing I found", "seventhsandwich thread #234e-6" that it becomes impossible to browse the forum.

If this thread is 'ambiguous' then so is "The best way to silence a rowdy class" and "omg why is this so funny" since we don't have any clue what the OP is talking about until we open the thread.

[Night Fox]

maybe it was joke that gets revealed in the op?
he wasn't banned so it's not ambiguous

you know that ambiguous is a real word, right? it has an actual definition? that it's not something badspot just made up?
btw

he probably wouldn't actually get in any sort of trouble for the title, but that doesn't change the fact that it is ambiguous

so I'm not saying he should or even would get banned for it. you should read an argument before trying to get involved in it, though

If this thread is 'ambiguous' then so is "The best way to silence a rowdy class" and "omg why is this so funny" since we don't have any clue what the OP is talking about until we open the thread.

no...
if you open the first one, you're going to be expecting it to tell you the best way to silence a rowdy class, right? yes. if you open the second, you're going to be expecting something funny

[Mr Man]

cream pie