What is your view on top freedom?

[Kearn]

idk if removing dumb rules is backwards then I guess we are going backwards

tell me how decency is a dumb rule

It isn't going backwards, these type of things are called reforms.

yeah actually it is

[Ad Bot]

[sir dooble]

Not acceptable.
It's not even acceptable for men to wander around towns and streets without a shirt on.

The only time it is acceptable for a man is at the beach, or at a swimming pool, because they are swimming.
And the distinction here is that the breasts of men aren't loveual in nature, whereas a woman's is.
A woman's should be covered up at all times in public (bar specific locations, like nudist beaches and naturist retreats), and a man's should be covered up at all times bar the above.

It's public decency is all.
You don't go around showing off your genitals, so you don't go showing off your breasts, particularly in public where there can be children about.

[takato14]

if any nudity is legalized, all nudity must be legalized

otherwise idgas

[SeventhSandwich]

I don't care either way.

[Night Fox]

"I cant go without my top because it's 'distracting', but men can go without their shirt all the time!"
Men don't have tits. That is literally the only explanation for this and the one thing that could possibly destroy the viewpoint behind top freedom. Tits are loveually attractive to males and a part of the female genitalia. If you let top freedom be legalized, that's like letting men walk around with giant holes in their jeans.

so, let me get this straight, you don't think women are attracted to male chests?

[Frankie²]

so, let me get this straight, you don't think women are attracted to male chests?

if you're an average joe thats slightly overweight, no

[sir dooble]

so, let me get this straight, you don't think women are attracted to male chests?

I would be confident to say that they likely aren't attracted to them in the same way that men are to breasts.
Female breasts are designed by evolution to be attractive to men. The male breast just isn't to the same extent.

[Skig]

I really don't think any good would come out this. It is just overrall a bad idea

[DiceyGrammar]

Not acceptable.
It's not even acceptable for men to wander around towns and streets without a shirt on.

Depends on where you are I guess.

That's commonplace all over Australia.

[sir dooble]

Depends on where you are I guess.

That's commonplace all over Australia.

Well, we are considering places with a bit of culture.

And surely Australia's one of the dumbest places to do that anyway?
I bet a lot of the idiots are brits on holiday too. No wonder they get called poms.

[DiceyGrammar]

And surely Australia's one of the dumbest places to do that anyway?

I'm not sure what you mean?

[sir dooble]

I'm not sure what you mean?

Well, speaking about the Australian summer really.
Australia is a particularly hot place, and parading around without clothing on is a good way to get burnt and promote development of skin cancer (assuming of course that you don't use any sun screens, but I dare say the sort of person who wanders around in the glaring sunlight without a shirt on doesn't pay too much attention to sun safety).

[McZealot]

yeah i think they should be able to go topless. it would be "distracting" for a small time period because for some reason western culture finds nudity awful. there are lots of places in africa in which breasts are not loveualized at all, and women dont wear shirts.

it isn't hurting anybody so why not? if someone finds it "distracting" then don't look at it. in some parts of new york its completely legal for women to be topless. i even saw several topless women when i was there for a week.

[XR-7]

I find it indecent, mostly along the same lines as dooble.

[Harm94]

For the record, its not illegal for a woman for go out in public without a bra and a shirt. It's only public indecency if loveual organs(snake, vagina) are showing and you do some sort of action with them to get attention.