Author Topic: Apple's master plan may have been revealed.  (Read 10075 times)

next up: you will need to buy an apple outlet to charge an iPhone

next up: you will need to buy an apple outlet to charge an iPhone

thats basically already the case with their own unique charging cables.

So be it, let him hate them, but does that mean he should come into laptop buying threads and spew stuff everywhere?
What I said wasn't directed at him and I also never said anything about him having to do so. He shouldn't as you are right on that.

No, I was not trying to make me seem like I want a medal, my point was if you are clumsy with your phone that is your own fault, not Apple's.
Sorry for sounding like an ass on that one.  It just seemed as if you were just boasting it about.



Oh god there's so many things wrong about this...
« Last Edit: June 08, 2014, 11:43:27 PM by izzyaxel »

Even if there are things wrong with that graph, that's one obvious piece of evidence that they are no better. The Square Wave graph.

Even if you aren't an audio expert, you can understand the statement that a square waves' shape is meant to be square. I haven't looked into Beats until now, and curved waves for a square wave response?

Are you kidding?

Oh god there's so many things wrong about this...

then fill us in

Oh god there's so many things wrong about this...

Nah it's pretty spot on. I've tried every Beats there are. Not only is EVERYTHING drowned out in stuffty bass (whose response is also piss poor), but the free apple earpods sound better.

Oh god there's so many things wrong about this...
then why dont you say whats wrong

just saying "its wrong" doesnt make your right

"lol scrub you can't afford beats go get a life with your crappy headphones fggt lol *skrilliezx*"

Apple is literally the stuffyest most overrated company ever

then why dont you say whats wrong

just saying "its wrong" doesnt make your right
izzy was mainly referring to how STUPIDLY oversimplified (and sometimes entirely incorrect) the explanations at the top are

measurements are deceptively simple in appearance; explaining how to read all of those squiggly lines would take a LOT of effort

Even if there are things wrong with that graph, that's one obvious piece of evidence that they are no better. The Square Wave graph.

Even if you aren't an audio expert, you can understand the statement that a square waves' shape is meant to be square. I haven't looked into Beats until now, and curved waves for a square wave response?

Are you kidding?
like for example, this is entirely false

« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 12:22:39 AM by takato14 »

ITT: Everybody hates Chris Apple.

for everyone debating the "correctness" of measurements

izzy was mainly referring to how STUPIDLY oversimplified (and sometimes entirely incorrect) the explanations at the top are

measurements are deceptively simple in appearance; explaining how to read all of those squiggly lines would take a LOT of effort

Even if there are things wrong with that graph, that's one obvious piece of evidence that they are no better. The Square Wave graph.

Even if you aren't an audio expert, you can understand the statement that a square waves' shape is meant to be square. I haven't looked into Beats until now, and curved waves for a square wave response?

Are you kidding?

like for example, this is entirely false

Please do explain. I mean, it says square wave response. I would suppose it would be optimal for a wave to respond in a square fashion? Stop trying to support one of the most overblown pieces of "audio" I've ever seen heard.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 12:25:44 AM by ShadowsfeaR »


again wrong

all of those square waves are way better than the ones on the beats

if the line goes below the 0 degree mark on the scale that is an INSTANT red flag, that means absolutely rancid control (especially in the bass)

you want a quick, sharp overshoot followed by a smooth, no-noise line afterwards for the 30Hz, and mostly the same for the 300Hz except you want a second peak, followed by a little wiggle

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/StaxSR009.pdf

this is basically a perfect set of square waves

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/MonsterBeatsbyDrDreSoloHD.pdf

here's the Solo HD for comparison

http://www.innerfidelity.com/images/MonsterBeatsStudio.pdf

and the Studio



Even if there are things wrong with that graph, that's one obvious piece of evidence that they are no better. The Square Wave graph.
oh damnit I just realized he was saying BEATS are no better here, I thought he meant the other headphones were no better, I didn't read the entire post

sorry
« Last Edit: June 09, 2014, 12:41:40 AM by takato14 »

You are literally kindling the fire. Both graphs look atrocious in comparison to the "prefect wave". Which, by the way, looks pretty square to me. The Studio looks like a mentally handicapped audio child.