Poll

Does you think this is for real or hoax?

Real
30 (38.5%)
Hoax
48 (61.5%)

Total Members Voted: 78

Author Topic: NASA's New Design for a Warp Drive Ship  (Read 5118 times)

Ipquarx, if I'm reading the post correctly, I think what he means is that since light is radiation, and since black holes "have radiation", going by the logic of since a=b & c=b, a=c, black holes are light. At least that's what I got out of it (not true, of course).
Oh okay. Well no, black holes are not some form of light.

If it is possible, How are we going to get that thing in space in the first place?

If it is possible, How are we going to get that thing in space in the first place?
r u srs

Like, really, that'd be the least of our worries.

Quite certain faster than light goes against all laws of physics.
unless our concept of the 'laws of physics' is incorrect in that regard

99% of the people in this thread have absolutely no idea about half the physics they're talking about. I'm sure as forget I don't, but I definitely understand more than some of the people here.

From what I think I understand:
You cant really compare this concept to changing air pressure, although it is similar. Think of it in steps:
It makes the space in front of the ship smaller, so the distance to the target destination from the ship is smaller.
It moves forward through the space, probably just using orbital velocity, or some generic thrusters.
Then it expands the space behind it to make it back to normal.

It does all this constantly, so that space isn't forgeted up around it (it would break some rule of physics somewhere otherwise).


About the whole 'how to power this' thing which some guy raised; As far as I can tell, the amount of energy required isn't actually that much. Sure, its more than your computer uses, but from that link, he said something like it will cost around the same energy as [another spaceship] has (in terms of mass). If by that it is only considering the gravitational potential energy from the ship, then that is a tiny amount. Like, probably less than a lightbulb. Of course, there will be other parts of the device that require power, so it wont be cheap to run, but sure, whatever, its nasa, im sure they have a renewable power generator lying around somewhere.


About colliding with space-junk and particles and stuff; I'm not too sure about it. Yes, there is definitely stuff in space, particles of stuff, asteroids, etc.. I guess what will happen is:
Only objects that are in the way of the space infront of the ship thats being shrunk could cause a problem. I think it would actually turn smaller (from the ships point of reference), until it gets into the space around the ship that isn't shrunk, and then you would just have a giant asteroid in your face. You wouldn't be moving any faster relative to it than you would be if you got there normally. What would be more interesting is if an object goes past the ship, but still in the area of effect. If you looked behind you, you would see fricken giant ass asteroids like right behind you, and then they would shrink to regular size.


Ill probably think of more crap to say after I've posted this..

If it is possible, How are we going to get that thing in space in the first place?
getting stuff into space is easy

If it is possible, How are we going to get that thing in space in the first place?
bring it up piece by piece and put it all together up there

bring it up piece by piece and put it all together up there
Or launch it normally?

Or launch it normally?
I was gonna say that this thing looks like it weighs at least as much as a 737, which is 60,000lbs at the least, I guess I assumed it was heavier than all the other stuff we've sent up there, but then I found out that the Saturn V weighed like six million pounds, so nevermind lol

I was gonna say that this thing looks like it weighs at least as much as a 737, which is 60,000lbs at the least, I guess I assumed it was heavier than all the other stuff we've sent up there, but then I found out that the Saturn V weighed like six million pounds, so nevermind lol
oh, it looks huge so

Or launch it normally?
How are you going to launch a thing that is bigger then a saiceship in space?
Wich probarly doesn't even have thrusters?

How are you going to launch a thing that is bigger then a saiceship in space?
Wich probarly doesn't even have thrusters?
What saiceship is?



I was gonna say that this thing looks like it weighs at least as much as a 737, which is 60,000lbs at the least, I guess I assumed it was heavier than all the other stuff we've sent up there, but then I found out that the Saturn V weighed like six million pounds, so nevermind lol

that 6 million pounds was what was needed to get some couple of hundred pounds worth of actual astronomical equipment into orbit. The rest crashed back to earth.