http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=256982yes it is and i will bump it if i need to
/mirror
its usually widely accepted that there is a q and an a also
but does it really matterLGBT+ there ya go
yeah but they didnt even add the plus? and also what would there be after q and a? anything? i mean it really can't be that hard to type two letters.
two letters after every instancewhat's wrong with just LGBT? why does there have to be a Q? what does it stand for? i know about the A but still it's unneccesary; we get the point, loveual acceptance, no need to add every possible loving thing. what next, LGBTQAOPF? Lesbian Gay Bi Trans Queer Aloveual Omni Pan Furry?
no. literally, just 2 more letters. like i said. you're really dense, aren't you.
I know it's 2 more letters, but it's unneccesary. I'm not being dense, there is literally no point. I don't read LGBT and think "boy, that specifically refers to lesbians, gays, bis, and trans; only them!" I read it and think, "loveual acceptance movement," which includes queer (wtf that's exactly the same thing anyway) and aloveual. Besides, LGBTQA doesn't even cover everything.
what other letters would there be? and i really don't understand why it's so hard to grasp that you are 2 letters away from encompassing the whole movement, which seems more efficient.
Omniloveual, panloveual, polyloveual... as I said, it's not more efficient to type 50% more when it serves literally no purpose. People know that LGBT encompasses aloveuality and other forms of loveuality even if it isn't in the title.
you're making an argument to not expend that effort
Yes, I am. It's unnecessary (especially the meaningless Q) and might be confusing to certain people for a change with absolutely zero payout. What difference does it make? At all?
lesbian, gay, biloveual, and transgendered.
like op isnt even acknowledging the entire movement, and it's like why? whats the point of the thread?
