Neither of these were actually insulting anyone though.Only you could conceive "The furry thread is allowed this probably is too." as a loving personal attack.
Maybe beacuse you generally wouldn't be reading it unless it was addessed to you and you knew about it.
You know, unless you're just stalking someone's posts looking to start stuff.
You're the one who started this stuff anyway.
This all started with me asking a question for trans people.I didn't want to start an argument.
what? are you telling me that you only read posts that are addressed to you? you seem to berofl :^)I guess I'm the one who brought up the issue of you being argumentative, but I only did because you were being argumentative and hostile. sooobut you do this stuff all the time
Fine, I'll ask my question again:"If gender is a social construct and things like dresses and long hair aren't inherently female-related, then why is adopting these things considered an integral step in becoming the opposite love?"Happy? That's about as neutral as I can get it.
"If gender is a social construct and things like dresses and long hair aren't inherently female-related, then why is adopting these things considered an integral step in becoming the opposite love?"
people typically use articles of clothing to express themselvesby wearing clothes that females have a tendency to wear, you are putting off a feminine vibeits unavoidable, its just how society (or rather the human mind) works
i know a bunch of forumers who are gay but aren't trying to turn themselves into traps
It's amazing how Night Fox isn't even aware of the fact that he starts 50% of all arguments on the forum.
sources please