lets talk about moral quandries

[AcornCake]

...how do you think trinity happened

FEW EXCEPTIONS

[Ad Bot]

[Niff]

1. Ye
2. Ye
3. Ye

[TheABELBOTO]

I always been interested in situations like this

1. I convince the girl to kill herself, torturing her emotionally until she snaps
2. Threaten to kill the guy's wife while next to her and describe the things I'll do, but really we're both acting together
3. me and the burly guy look for boulders to stop it in time (trains aren't THAT fast)
You have to find a justifiable reason to use necromancy, how would you do it?
remember that any revived humans are essentially "slaves" which are morally wrong to own.

[Maxwell.]

it revolutionized the world tho

was it that or tsar bomba that made the us and russia realise "ok we need to stop making these bombs bigger or risk wiping ourselves out"

[Foxscotch]

on the bright side, rebuilding the city would create tons of new jobs to spur the economy

yeah like 50 years later and only after losing millions of people

I wouldn't take the chance of them reproducing and wiping out all of America, so nuke

there's only one, I don't think they could reproduce alone

it revolutionized the world tho

they thought there was a chance it could ignite our atmosphere and we would all die. everyone. everything ever, that ever was or will be, would be gone, for a weapon. that slight possibility isn't worth the creation of something that would lead to the popularization of the most deadly weapons ever

[UnoriginalGuy]

i should answer OP's questions
1. if i'm legally immune and everyone agrees with me, then surely the girl will agree to being tortured to death
2. once again, she will agree to the interrogation
3. the large burly man will agree to jump in front of the train

[UnoriginalGuy]

yeah like 50 years later and only after losing millions of people

aren't you a real negative nancy?

[Maxwell.]

aren't you a real negative nancy?

he's facing the facts

[Foxscotch]

aren't you a real negative nancy?

the ENTIRE point of this is for it to be difficult to choose. it would be useless if you didn't consider the reality of the situation before trying to decide

[Jairo]

they thought there was a chance it could ignite our atmosphere and we would all die. everyone. everything ever, that ever was or will be, would be gone, for a weapon. that slight possibility isn't worth the creation of something that would lead to the popularization of the most deadly weapons ever

well if everyone dies, then it's served it's purpose, huh

we are not descended from fearful men

[Foxscotch]

well if everyone dies, then it's served it's purpose, huh

well, no. they wanted to kill everyone except themselves, "except" being the most important part

[AcornCake]

well, no. they wanted to kill everyone except themselves, "except" being the most important part

survival of the fittest

[TheABELBOTO]

should I tell foxscotch he's being a bit richardish or support him

[YES]   [NO]


UGG IT'S SO HARD D:

[UnoriginalGuy]

survival of the fittest

[Foxscotch]

survival of the fittest

...doesn't apply if literally everyone dies