Author Topic: There's more Adult Female gamers than Teenage Boys  (Read 4774 times)

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/female-adults-oust-teenage-boys-largest-gaming-demographic/

This has been known for quite a while, but I haven't seen any discussion here.

Frankly, I'm pretty sure their largest proportion by platform would be mobile, and I really wouldn't be surprised if they were playing games like Angry Birds and Candy Crush.

Methinks this invalids a lot of SJW bullstuff.

yeah cus teenage boys don't play candy crush or angry birds

"Women are playing more video games — on both consoles like Nintendo’s Wii and mobile devices."
Figures.

people are quick to say "cus women are dumb and can't,  appreciate real games", but this is really just a product of gaming hitting a mainstream mobile market.

"Women are playing more video games — on both consoles like Nintendo’s Wii and mobile devices."
Figures.
They gotta start somewhere. Most people now have a mobile, and the Wii is the cheapest console and also has the most fitness-based options. I think it's only natural we see a lot of females who've probably never been formally introduced to gaming finally pick up some games on these platforms.

Hopefully soon we'll see games that are a bit deeper and serious (anything from Minecraft to Civillisation to your Mass Effect etc etc) on these accessible platforms that encourage females to try out the games we're more accustomed to and enjoy. Basically, we're just missing that middle-man between simple and repetitive challenge games and deeper gameplay experiences.

people are quick to say "cus women are dumb and can't,  appreciate real games", but this is really just a product of gaming hitting a mainstream mobile market.
Too right, and meanwhile I know more females than males who play games, and some of their favourite games are Minecraft, Bioshock, Team Fortress 2 etc.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 05:51:53 AM by McJobless »

They gotta start somewhere. Most people now have a mobile, and the Wii is the cheapest console and also has the most fitness-based options. I think it's only natural we see a lot of females who've probably never been formally introduced to gaming finally pick up some games on these platforms.

Hopefully soon we'll see games that are a bit deeper and serious (anything from Minecraft to Civillisation to your Mass Effect etc etc) on these accessible platforms that encourage females to try out the games we're more accustomed to and enjoy. Basically, we're just missing that middle-man between simple and repetitive challenge games and deeper gameplay experiences.

I highly doubt that. To begin with, anything related to mobile gaming which has a insanely bigger demographic for females than for males are Facebook free to play (pay to win) bullstuff. This business model is extremely stupid in comparison to actual games. The females that play those games will NOT become actual gamers. It's not something they pick up and feel accomplished, no, it's something they pick up, annoy their 'friends' with and then brag around with on every case. There was nothing stopping females from playing "normal" games directly, and they did, do, and will continue to do, which is perfectly fine and great. However, adding mobile phone gaming to the demographic is stupid. I refuse to consider mobile phone as actual 'serious' gaming demographic. If your "theory" is true, this equivalents to toddler educational games. Why doesn't someone add toddler professional gamers to the demographic?

anything related to mobile gaming which has a insanely bigger demographic for females than for males are Facebook free to play (pay to win) bullstuff.
They're still games. They still have the objective (Goals/Objectives, Rules, Obstacles/Failure States, Boundaries) aspects of a game, as well as some subjective ones (stuff like the audio, visuals, input, output and engagement). You can't just discount them because they're poorly made and have a stuffty monetisation system.

I hate them too, just as much as I hate a lot of crap on Newgrounds, but I'm not about to discount them when they clearly still are games in some respect.

This business model is extremely stupid in comparison to actual games. The females that play those games will NOT become actual gamers. It's not something they pick up and feel accomplished, no, it's something they pick up, annoy their 'friends' with and then brag around with on every case.
I disagree. Yeah, we might look down on them from our Ivory Towers with our giant Steam libraries and hours of console wear-and-tear, but that doesn't we can say "they're not REAL gamers". That's a cop out phrase gamers use to feel better about themselves when they find out people spend more time in real life than they do playing games.

I'm sure these people do feel accomplished. They may love to brag about it, but they still feel the same things we do. We're all human.

There was nothing stopping females from playing "normal" games directly, and they did, do, and will continue to do, which is perfectly fine and great.
Aside from the fact that it's like when I first saw anime/manga and wondered "What the forget?" There's just so many games, genres, styles etc that you don't really know where to start, or what you're going to like. A lot of people won't try something because they're scared of it, which is what I was of anime/manga for a while. It takes either somebody recommending you trying something, or a "leap of faith".

If your "theory" is true, this equivalents to toddler educational games. Why doesn't someone add toddler professional gamers to the demographic?
Who's to say they haven't? I actually haven't seen or heard of many toddlers playing video games. I bet a lot do, but statistics don't record for them because they don't purchase the games or talk about them online.

-snip-

Either way you look at it, I refuse (and I don't understand how you accept it) to acknowledge casual mobile game players as actual gamers. It's dumb.

Either way you look at it, I refuse (and I don't understand how you accept it) to acknowledge casual mobile game players as actual gamers. It's dumb.
+1

If you play a game, you're by definition a gamer.  forget off with your stuffty elitist interpretation of the word and just call yourself a "hardcore" gamer or whatever you'd like.

If you play a game, you're by definition a gamer.  forget off with your stuffty elitist interpretation of the word and just call yourself a "hardcore" gamer or whatever you'd like.
when i was 8 years old, i played elmo games
gamer

why the hell is the definition of gamer 'if you play one game' anyway.
gamer. think about it. you frequently play games. any mobile applications aren't games- not even close. a 'true' definition of a gamer is when you frequently play games like battlefield or skyrim or loving cod for example, not 5-minute timewasters or diner dash or something
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 06:43:48 AM by Arekan »

Okay, frequently playing a game makes you a gamer.  Candy Crush is a game.  Some people play it frequently.
It is not difficult math to do.  Just because you don't like the game or the genre or the platform it's on, doesn't make it any less a game than Call of Duty or TF2.

Again, feel free to call yourself a hardcore gamer, because that's totally fine! Don't feel free to butcher definitions just because, what, people are using a title you don't think they deserve?
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 06:51:17 AM by Skip »

Okay, frequently playing a game makes you a gamer.  Candy Crush is a game.  Some people play it frequently.
It is not difficult math to do.  Just because you don't like the game or the genre or the platform it's on, doesn't make it any less a game than Call of Duty or TF2.

Again, feel free to call yourself a hardcore gamer, because that's totally fine! Don't feel free to butcher definitions just because, what, people are using a title you don't think they deserve?

Holy stuff I was a hardcore gamer playing Dora The Explorer.

If I play lots of Monopoly, or Scrabble, or Pokemon TCG, am I not a gamer?
Even if I play it more than you play video games?
Or if I play lots of flash games, rather than video games, what then?

Mobile games count as games too. If you play them a lot you're a gamer. Just because the game might be free and have microtransactions that doesn't mean it isn't a valid game.
What's so special about being a gamer anyway that you want to preserve the title from people who play mobile/Facebook games?

Holy stuff I was a hardcore gamer playing Dora The Explorer.
I don't understand why you take so much offence to the idea that people are playing games that you don't personally like.

They're not selling you the games.
They're not shoving them down your throat.
They're not going to take away your favourite games so you can play the ones you don't like.

Why is it hard to comprehend that people have different tastes, experiences, and that not all games have to be 1080P MLG 1337 HD HARDCORE FPS NO SKRUBZ ALLOWED?

As I said, I don't like them either, but I can't see why they should be discounted as games when they clearly are.