When you say something and mean something else entirely ("citation" vs. "i abstractly referred to where i found this info"), yes, I'd say that makes a difference.
"Battle of the Best Browsers: IE Vs. Chrome Vs. Firefox Vs. Safari Vs. Opera." Chrome Vs Firefox Vs IE Vs Safari Vs Opera | Digital Trends. N.p., 3 July 2014. Web. 11 Sept. 2014. <http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/the-best-browser-internet-explorer-vs-chrome-vs-firefox-vs-safari/>.oh gee there i did it more properly big difference
You don't have to do an MLA citation for it to be a citation. All you have to do is link to where you found whatever you're talking about.The article you linked barely justifies its claim: FireFox has tiny tiny numerical differences in their benchmarks. Small enough differences that really, you won't ever notice them without anyone telling you. That hardly makes it "the best."
you could make that argument that it hardly makes it the best, but it's still the best.
And the reasoning for that is..?
I'd rather use Internet Explorer than Chrome. I'm not even joking.
I hate to say this, but you are the bane of web developers everywhere.I'm so sorry. D,:
you said it hardly makes it the best, so technically it would still be the best, right? i mean the article did say that
I posted a different source a page ago that said Chrome (Or actually depending on some bits Safari) was the best. You're basing your opinion on tiny differences in benchmarking performed by one source instead of actually providing your own justification. You can't even justify your own opinion with what you actually think.