See now this is interesting. Why were you angry?I'm pretty sure that's a terrible brown townogy. I'll play though: If being hungry is loveual desire, then what is a craving for a food?
Also, if the aloveual community's only problem is not being recognized as a community, then I'm going to say they got it pretty good.
I was angry as this was outright the completely wrong way to handle the issue, it was more like insulting being a male.
nobody said thatit's not really something you decide. you are or you aren't, and it's based on... what you are or aren't. I'm attracted to every gender, which is what panloveuality is defined as. so I'm panloveual. that's a fact. sure, I could say I'm not, but I would just be wrong. for example, let's say there is a girl who is attracted to girls. if she told me that she was straight, but then told me that she was attracted to girls, she would be wrong in saying that she was straight. I would probably just ignore her, rather than saying anything, but it's sort of a different context. the point is that, hypothetically, if I did tell her she was not straight, I wouldn't be wrong. because she isn't seriously? take some anger management classesthey do. but that doesn't mean it's okay
I have been in a school where all people do is fight ever since the second grade, someone throws a book, and then someone throws a desk back, I have learned to control anger, wasn't really that mad, it was just an expression.
