Author Topic: FCKH8 has hit a new low  (Read 12081 times)

Jesus christ, can no one ask questions on the internet anymore? I want to understand, and since apparently you and Foxnight are experts I figured this was as good of a time as any to ask.
Aloveuality doesn't seem real. It seems like a cop out or something.
:I
So, are you saying aloveuals don't feel attraction but they have love because it feels good? But then they don't desire what feels good?
they can have love if they want, because it feels good. but then yes, they dont desire it. i mean i know i said it was simple but there's actually a lot of different forms it could take now that i think about it. it goes from love repulsed to people that regularly have love.
youre getting really defensive like hes attacking aloveual people and with that mentality that a person who is trying to discern the psychology behind aloveual behavior is "investigating as if hes gonna invalidate it" it seems really counter-productive
Aloveuality doesn't seem real.
I'm saying its a bad definition. :/



oasis it looks like we just got ourselves into a righteous tagteam match
i got you bro, lets do this!



oasis it looks like we just got ourselves into a righteous tagteam match
i got you bro, lets do this!
I want to be the guy with the fabulous red sweatpants. You can be the bald guy.

Or wait, are we the asians in the matching blue pants?

Homoloveual, gay, lesbian, biloveual, panloveual, aloveual, and anything similar are just labels. You cannot define someone's loveuality. You can only define your own. Now shut the forget up and stop trying to tell people what they are.

Homoloveual, gay, lesbian, biloveual, panloveual, aloveual, and anything similar are just labels. You cannot define someone's loveuality. You can only define your own. Now shut the forget up and stop trying to tell people what they are.
How do you define your own without a label? Also what is a panloveual and why do they want to forget pans?

Homoloveual, gay, lesbian, biloveual, panloveual, aloveual, and anything similar are just labels. You cannot define someone's loveuality. You can only define your own. Now shut the forget up and stop trying to tell people what they are.

i identify as a toaster

"1 in 5 will be raped"
"We are still paid 23% less than men"
My god, nothing worse than this cringy ignorance.

Probably came from tumblr.

i'm not sure what else there is to get about aloveuality, but go ahead oasis
How do you define your own without a label? Also what is a panloveual and why do they want to forget pans?
panloveual = biloveuals who make a point to include trans/nonbinary people. i think.

"We are still paid 23% less than men"
my mom actually believes this lol
how do i explain that this is bullstuff without her hand-waving me off

How do you define your own without a label?
Labels are a choice. You can use them if you want, but I personally don't.
i identify as a toaster
This is called otherkin, which is a completely different argument.

my mom actually believes this lol
how do i explain that this is bullstuff without her hand-waving me off
maybe you are in a different situation, but i tried convincing my sister and i have gotten nothing but blown off completely.

Homoloveual, gay, lesbian, biloveual, panloveual, aloveual, and anything similar are just labels. You cannot define someone's loveuality. You can only define your own. Now shut the forget up and stop trying to tell people what they are.
yeah they're just labels. exactly. labels aren't there to define you, they're just for describing you. there's nothing wrong with telling someone that they're aloveual when they describe themselves as being what aloveual means

send in the clone v.117

How do you define your own without a label? Also what is a panloveual and why do they want to forget pans?
Those smooth grey curves... a slightly roughened surface... the firm wood cast handle... What's not to love?

Labels are a choice. You can use them if you want, but I personally don't.
^
I'm glad I'm straight.
wat