Author Topic: republicans took the senate, 54-46 after runoff +Rs take md., ill., mass. govs  (Read 5870 times)

"anarcho-capitalism!!!!"

That's not what he's saying.

Anyway Georges, it might reduce gridlock and get rid partisanship, but people will naturally form themselves into groups based on their beliefs even if they don't have a political party.


Both parties are terrible, but Obama is worse, and now he can't do anything. Which is good.

I really hate the two-party system, it's basically poisoning our government and turning it into a war. Unfortunately, the FPTP (first past the post) system, especially with the stuffty-ass electoral college, is basically destined to have two parties. If you're looking for information on better voting systems, check out CGP Grey's videos on the matter.

republicans or democrats, which would be in more favor for legalizing marijuana? i'm just curious.

libertarians XD


You guys take your personal political views way too seriously.

or you don't take yours serious enough  :panda:

Good, now my family can stop paying 42% taxes -_______-

You guys take your personal political views way too seriously.
your right. i shouldn't take my personal views seriously.

i am an empty slate.

in any case, maybe now there will be some legislation passed for chrissakes, good or bad.

fwiw robert sarvis the libertarian won a county in virginia
yesssSSsssssssssSSs

have i mentioned how much i hate the two party system yet today
yeah, 1 party system is better

republicans or democrats, which would be in more favor for legalizing marijuana? i'm just curious.
everyone already answered correctly already but let me put this in another way

over here in florida we have the choice to vote yes on two if we want medicinal marijuana approved
we also have rick scott as a republican and charlie crist for the democratic side

if rick scott is voted in and medical marijuana passes he will veto it upon being elected because why not



also it looks like rick scott won :panda:

or you don't take yours serious enough  :panda:
he clearly doesn't if this is to be believed
I'm an anarchist.
hes 2 kool for polirichards

That's not what he's saying.

Anyway Georges, it might reduce gridlock and get rid partisanship, but people will naturally form themselves into groups based on their beliefs even if they don't have a political party.
Yah, I suppose that's unfortunately true.

It's a good night to be a republican in texas. I'm looking forward to those liberal tears walking into class tomorrow when Wendy Davis loses out to Abbott.