"Poll: Should officer Darren Wilson, who shot Michael Brown, be arrested?"

[Blake1]

a white cop killed a black kid. so I'm not 100% sure where you're getting the idea that race is irrelevant

just because i kill a black kid who was attempting to kill me does not mean I only shot him for racism reasons. It's called self-defense, but obviously that idea is completely invisible to you gun-hating liberals.

[Ad Bot]

[SinnerOG]

just because i kill a black kid who was attempting to kill me does not mean I only shot him for racism reasons. It's called self-defense, but obviously that idea is completely invisible to you gun-hating liberals.

No. You're a tribal, white, landowning male from the South according to them. Duh.

[comr4de]

the autopsy proved that for him to be shot the way he was, he would at the /very least/ have to be on his knees

Okay you're gonna have to cite your sources here because all of the autopsy reports i've gotten say that not only was he standing he was also shot from the front

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/michael-browns-official-autopsy-report-actually-reveal/

"The St. Louis County medical examiner’s autopsy report indicated that 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot in the hand at close range during an altercation with Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson. To support that finding, the autopsy said a microscopic exam found foreign matter “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm” on the tissue of Brown’s thumb wound."

For this stuff to happen Brown would've had to be actually reaching for the officers gun. I don't care who the forget you are but if you try to grab a police officer's weapon they are going to defend themselves.

loving Moron

[Foxscotch]

A rubber bullet will not stop someone from shooting real bullets back at you.
Tear gas will not stop someone from shooting real bullets back at you.

umm. proof? both of those things would stop regular people from shooting at someone

By the time you get close enough to Taze someone, they've already killed you with real bullets.

right. because every encounter cops have is from at least 15 feet away. how could I not have known this?

So if a group of chinese guys are shooting at me and I shoot back and kill one, I am automatically a bigot and tribal for defending myself/shooting back?

well, no, but it does automatically involve race. since race was involved and all

just because i kill a black kid who was attempting to kill me does not mean I only shot him for racism reasons. It's called self-defense, but obviously that idea is completely invisible to you gun-hating liberals.

apparently, the only form of self-defense is murder

[Kimon²]

Okay you're gonna have to cite your sources here because all of the autopsy reports i've gotten say that not only was he standing he was also shot from the front

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/michael-browns-official-autopsy-report-actually-reveal/

"The St. Louis County medical examiner’s autopsy report indicated that 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot in the hand at close range during an altercation with Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson. To support that finding, the autopsy said a microscopic exam found foreign matter “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm” on the tissue of Brown’s thumb wound."

For this stuff to happen Brown would've had to be actually reaching for the officers gun. I don't care who the forget you are but if you try to grab a police officer's weapon they are going to defend themselves.

loving Moron

yeah he was either reaching for the cop's gun, like no credible witnesses have said

or his hand was in that position because his hands were up like almost everyone who witnessed the event said


i mean i really cant believe you guys are this naive
"what? a policeman? tribal???"

[comr4de]

HE DIDN DO NUFFIN HE A GOOD BOY

yeah he was either reaching for the cop's gun, like no credible witnesses have said

or his hand was in that position because his hands were up like almost everyone who witnessed the event said

but if his hands were up why would the cop shoot his hands

by your account you're saying the cop had it out to kill the kid. if that's the case why not aim for the head?

keep trying

[Foxscotch]

itt

not sure what this is supposed to prove

[Kimon²]

HE DIDN DO NUFFIN HE A GOOD BOYbut if his hands were up why would the cop shoot his hands

by your account you're saying the cop had it out to kill the kid. if that's the case why not aim for the head?

keep trying

did you even try
like at all
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html

keep trying

[Blake1]

apparently, the only form of self-defense is murder

you do realize his intention wasn't to kill the kid, right? He was clearly shooting out of self defense and accidentally shot the kid dead.

[comr4de]

did you even try
like at all
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html
-snibbeti snab-
keep trying

“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”

sigh


"He stressed that his information does not assign blame or justify the shooting."

SIGH

[Kimon²]

“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”

ah yes, because when i have a gun aimed right at my head i want to sprint at the gunman head-first, that's my first thought.
definitely not giving up.
like everyone said he did.

"He stressed that his information does not assign blame or justify the shooting."

ok??? the person just doesn't want to take a side like damn

like it is just cold hard facts out there to be interpreted by individuals

[Kimon²]

while we're at it someone explain how mike brown would be shot 6 times while running at the guy, including when he was on the ground bleeding to death, in those areas, including his hand/arm

and how everyone said the last shot was to the head
when he was on the ground dying, and the officer had a clear shot at it

[comr4de]

ok??? the person just doesn't want to take a side like damn

like it is just cold hard facts out there to be interpreted by individuals

Not how medical examinations work, stuffhead. If the ME says that they couldn't determine what happened, they don't know what happened.


If the ME says that it doesn't assign blame to either party it means that the evidence is insufficient to blame either party. I don't know how you think the legal system works but in order to prove someone guilty you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the events happened the way you say they did. If the evidence is insufficient or doesn't lead to that conclusion then the officer isn't guilty.

[Kimon²]

Not how medical examinations work, stuffhead. If the ME says that they couldn't determine what happened, they don't know what happened.


If the ME says that it doesn't assign blame to either party it means that the evidence is insufficient to blame either party. I don't know how you think the legal system works but in order to prove someone guilty you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the events happened the way you say they did. If the evidence is insufficient or doesn't lead to that conclusion then the officer isn't guilty.

it means is that the evidence isn't sufficient enough to prove darren wilson guilty
doesnt mean he is or isn't guilty

which i think he is personally, based on that

[comr4de]

it means is that the evidence isn't sufficient enough to prove darren wilson guilty

Nor does it prove the officer guilty. I'm out because I have IRL work to go to but harm should be here in a second to continue where I'm leaving off.