how come loveual images of children are illegal but not pictures of dead children

[Blockaium]

this is something i really never understood. im not saying that child research should or shouldnt be legal, tbh i dont care because i probably would never see it anyway. but sometimes just browsing google images you can come across a picture of a dead child even with their head halfway off or with stab wounds or whatever. im not saying that these should be allowed either, once again, because i would never see any of them. im just saying, you'd expect they would either be both illegal or none of them.

[Ad Bot]

[KillerCop311]

...what?

[Nal]

...what?

[Torin0101]

because faked images should be illegal
This isn't New Zealand, we don't have rediculous censorship laws

[the hacker]

According to mass media, love is worse than violence.

[Blockaium]

According to mass media, love is worse than violence.

ya ik but once again im just saying you'd expect them to either outlaw both or none

[Maxwell.]

...what?

what do you not get

[Doomonkey]

Forcing children to perform love is an awful thing. Children cannot give consent to be in researchographic things. By looking at those pictures, you support the awful people who do those things.

Looking at pictures of dead children does not cause people to murder children. There is no such market.

[KickFlow]

Idk isn't necrophilia illegal or something?

[Blockaium]

Forcing children to perform love is an awful thing. Children cannot give consent to be in researchographic things. By looking at those pictures, you support the awful people who do those things.

Looking at pictures of dead children does not cause people to murder children. There is no such market.

search white phosphorus injuries and CIA victims

[Doomonkey]

search white phosphorus injuries and CIA victims

What? Did you completely miss my point? The production and distribution of child research is probably one of despicable industries there is. Children are literally forced into having love. loveual images of children promote this industry. This is awful. This is completely wrong. There should be no doubt in anybody's mind that this is absolutely atrocious.

Killing children is not an industry. By looking at videos of dead children you do not support the killing of them. I would go so far as to say that seeing images of dead children probably causes people to rally against it and actually reduces violence to children.

[Blockaium]

you're right on that but i think you also missed my point, im not saying since gory child images are legal that child research should be legal too, im saying that since cp is illegal its surprising the other one isnt.

[Doomonkey]

you're right on that but i think you also missed my point, im not saying since gory child images are legal that child research should be legal too, im saying that since cp is illegal its surprising the other one isnt.

How are you surprised? You still don't understand. One thing promotes one of the most awful crimes in existence. The other thing doesn't. The other thing probably stops its associated crime. One thing is objectively awful. One thing is not.

[Harm94]

Using pictures of dead people for political reasons and moral reasons such as bringing awareness to genocides is okay. Using photos of kids loveually both alive and dead is both immoral and illegal.

[Daswiruch]

there's a subreddit exclusively for pictures of dead children