Author Topic: Death Penalty in the US- Yes or no? (Another discussion)  (Read 3685 times)

yeah
give bombers jobs as demolition men
that'll work
thanks for the idea
unless on serial killers, terrorists, and hardened murderers yes deathpenalty

3 hot meals a day, a bed, and yard time? doesn't sound like much of a punishment to me.
Plus they can get their own TV, some games, they can even buy all the raman they want. It's not as bad of a punishment as most would think. Leave death for the most serious offenders.

Also to get the death penalty, you basically have to be the most forgeted up person on this earth, it's not something that the prosecution likes to give out freely.

If you stole car, performed some unarmed robbery, you'll be in out of prison in less than ten years.

Plus they can get their own TV, some games, they can even buy all the raman they want. It's not as bad of a punishment as most would think. Leave death for the most serious offenders.

Also to get the death penalty, you basically have to be the most forgeted up person on this earth, it's not something that the prosecution likes to give out freely.

If you stole car, performed some unarmed robbery, you'll be in out of prison in less than ten years.
Lol solitary confinement causes people to go insane. And video games? Are you sure you're not talking about Norway? Cause some Norway prisons basically encourage people to get themselves arrested
Norway:

America:


Flash Mober Anders Breivk cell:

Lol solitary confinement causes people to go insane. And video games? Are you sure you're not talking about Norway? Cause some Norway prisons basically encourage people to get themselves arrested
Norway:

America:


Flash Mober Anders Breivk cell:

Games like checkers, connect four, chess. If they were electronic, I would have said video games.

Prison labor is a much better bet for life prisoners with no way out. Just force them to make money for the government! Yay!

Prison is supposed to be about punishment. Make them pay for their crime. A lifetime in solitary confinement is much more damaging than being killed.
A "lifetime in solitary confinement" is a complete waste. What's the point? Watch the guy turn insane?

Why waste a giant ammount of money to keep a criminal alive so he can "learn a lesson" that'll be completely useless because he dies at the end? Just dispose of them

If there is absolute proof that you took the life of other individuals with no possible shenanigans, I believe you should be immediately injected with sleepy drugs and put down like a pet sheep.

With more lenience to injections, the law could be killing someone who is entirely innocent or at least didn't forget up that bad.

The judge and jury determine what happens in an inconsistent way constantly, so to inscribe such a law would require the utmost care- or some shall perish in vain. (any several have)

Also, why just Death Penalty in the US? Are other countries not worthy of civil law and moral understanding and debate?

No. I don't like the idea that the state can decide when you die.
well considering it only ever happens to murderers who decided when other people died, it's fine.

we should have more creative ways of execution though
my social studies teacher last year told the class his idea of slitting a person's wrists before kicking them into a shark tank

we should have more creative ways of execution though
my social studies teacher last year told the class his idea of slitting a person's wrists before kicking them into a shark tank
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDO6HV6xTmI

Peel potatoes until they die
« Last Edit: December 15, 2014, 06:57:07 PM by ThatRandomGuy »

manslaughter? accidental?
I read a story in the Bible where if you killed a man, it was the victim's cousin's duty to kill the murderer. It did not matter if it was accidental or not. The murderer could seek refuge in this certain city that would house him and not allow the cousin to kill the murderer. The city would then figure out if the murderer was innocent. If he was innocent, they would keep him under their hospitality, and he would work and be a citizen to the city. If he was guilty, he would be turned over to be killed.
In the olden days, if you committed a crime you were hanged. This got rid of the evil people. Now, they are let free (don't want to get into politics at all here). Once they are released, it's like an infection, and more people turn and do the crimes.
That may or not be true, that's up for debate. But if the person is truly guilty, an eye for an eye.

I read a story in the Bible where if you killed a man, it was the victim's cousin's duty to kill the murderer. It did not matter if it was accidental or not. The murderer could seek refuge in this certain city that would house him and not allow the cousin to kill the murderer. The city would then figure out if the murderer was innocent. If he was innocent, they would keep him under their hospitality, and he would work and be a citizen to the city. If he was guilty, he would be turned over to be killed.
In the olden days, if you committed a crime you were hanged. This got rid of the evil people. Now, they are let free (don't want to get into politics at all here). Once they are released, it's like an infection, and more people turn and do the crimes.
That may or not be true, that's up for debate. But if the person is truly guilty, an eye for an eye.
yeah but this is reality, not fantasy


we should have more creative ways of execution though
my social studies teacher last year told the class his idea of slitting a person's wrists before kicking them into a shark tank
Cruel and Usual, pretty barbaric. Firing line and sleep drugs  and poison are the way to go.