so its socially acceptable for someone to RAT outpact because he's had a horrible past?
thats like saying i can go over to Lord Tony's house and break his windows and nobody would give a stuff because "he deserved" it
i dont think you'd like it if someone RAT'd you and wiped your hard drive
to add onto this, why is it that problem users are allowed no input?
for example, this thread.
everyone thinks that destroying what a user took possibly months worth to acheive (games, products, software) is ok, but if its some popular user, for example; Filipe, or someone like that, they'd get mourned and everyone would be on his side.
But no, in this case Outpact is the loving friend for having A. a terrible history, yet people think attacking him is completely ok because time has been ticking forward and Outpact didn't use the past year correctly.
That's literally the equivalent to having someone stabbed that everyone hates yet everyone thinks its ok.
This is why problem users never get the chance to change their reputation, they get no input and when they try they are ridiculed for it, i don't even have to explain how and show evidence where, its all over this loving forum.
Someone started it, and hundreds of people enforce it which causes the endless loop of problem users never getting allowed input because they made a scar on their reputation.
It's loving bullstuff.
[citation needed]
I don't think you'd like it if someone were to crash your Blockland server you spent time working on either.
I don't need citation for the thousands of hours of bullstuff people have caused toward problem users, they get allowed zero loving input and it's time to loving stop.
