Ms. Terra

[Compy]

instead of solving our problems lets ignore them

world peace at last

[Ad Bot]

[Jubel]

Does it have to personally affect me for it to be worth looking into? I don't care whether or not it's a boy, girl, dinosaur, whatever. I'm just explaining how Mr. Terra could very, very easily prove his case in one picture, effectively ending the controversy.

End a controversy that has to do with them posting a lot?
Big whoop. When I signed up I went nuts with the posting. Give it a week or two. Unless it's Night Fox 3.0, that average posts per day will lower.

Who gives a forget if they're a chick or not. Maybe I'm just lying about my loveuality, maybe I'm a girl. You wouldn't know, because I haven't posted a picture on the forum.
Them being a chick has no relevance here, and pretty much everything said has been nothing but personal conjecture.

[Count]

Wtf rally, what would proving her gender even do? You say she is making a lot of annoying posts. Whether its a guy or a girl doesn't matter in that case. Either way they are just an annoying stuff poster. Seems to me you just want more pics of this girl. If someone decides to give her free stuff because of her being a girl, they had it coming to them.

[Rally]

Look man I don't really care what you think about the controversy, I'm just saying that the time-stamp is the best possible way to confirm your identity. Then nobody can call you out for being an alt/liar/what have you.

Yeah, everything is personal conjecture. You know what wouldn't be personal conjecture? A time-stamp.

Wtf rally, what would proving her gender even do? You say she is making a lot of annoying posts

Never said the words. Said he's making a large amount of posts in rapid succession, which carries implications.

Seems to me you just want more pics of this girl. If someone decides to give her free stuff because of her being a girl, they had it coming to them.

lol @ you trying to spindoctor that against me, respect, better luck next time

Yes, you are correct. I want more pics of the girl. This time with a time-stamp. Honestly pretty curious if I'm right or wrong here.

[Ipquarx]

I'm just saying that the time-stamp is the best possible way to confirm your identity.

Except timestamps can be faked

Yeah, everything is personal conjecture. You know what wouldn't be personal conjecture? A time-stamp.

Except timestamps can be faked

Never said the words. Said he's making a large amount of posts in rapid succession, which carries implications.

Except it doesn't at all. Lurkers are a thing, you know.

[hillkill]

are u guys like national socialists that control and discriminate people who post more than a few times a day?

[Futurjojo]

The only thing i saw from Ms. Terra is some harmless off topic posts.

You could show the worst posts, that would make the topic more understandable.

[Jubel]

Said he's making a large amount of posts in rapid succession, which carries implications.

Carries implications of what? That they like posting on an internet forum?

[Rally]

Except timestamps can be faked
Except timestamps can be faked
Except it doesn't at all. Lurkers are a thing, you know.

Not if done correctly.
Not if done correctly.
Except it does.

huRR HuRR contradiction is cool

Carries implications of what? That they like posting on an internet forum?

Fast learners are usually alts. I'm not saying they always are, obviously. I'm saying that sometimes they are. Is this logic unreasonable? Alts have been busted on this basis before.

[Electrk.]

I don't care about her gender, I'm just suspicious that she's an alt.

I guess it doesn't really matter in the long run

are u guys like national socialists that control and discriminate people who post more than a few times a day?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

[diss.]

are u guys like national socialists that control and discriminate people who post more than a few times a day?

i dont discriminate against people on an online lego forum

[Ipquarx]

Not if done correctly.

How so? EXIF data is 100% fakable in all scenarios. CGI can be used on existing photos. There is literally no way to tell 100% for certain, which is what you seem to be aiming for here.

[Jubel]

Not if done correctly.
Not if done correctly.

This doesn't make sense. If I was so inclined I could upload a file and modify the exif data myself to make it look believable.
Not being able to fake exif data by faking exif data correctly makes no sense whatsoever.

Except it does.

Fast learners are usually alts. I'm not saying they always are, obviously.

huRR HuRR contradiction is cool

[Rally]

How so? EXIF data is 100% fakable in all scenarios. CGI can be used on existing photos. There is literally no way to tell 100% for certain, which is what you seem to be aiming for here.

Well for starters I'm not loving stupid and neither are you. If the timestamp is faked chances are somebody's gonna notice. If someone goes into that much effort to fake a time-stamp, and they fool all of us, more power to em'. At that point I don't even care.

I don't get what the huge deal is. Yeah there's no 100% certain way of proving Mr. Terra's identity. Time-stamp is the most credible. I don't see what the problem is in recommending it. Pretend that you're not indifferent for a second, how do you suggest he prove his identity?

You'd make a great defense attorney.

This doesn't make sense. If I was so inclined I could upload a file and modify the exif data myself to make it look believable.
Not being able to fake exif data by faking exif data correctly makes no sense whatsoever.

see above
im talking about the kind of timestamp where the subject writes the time and his username on paper, takes a picture of himself with it and posts it here

Usually =/= always. Don't know how to explain this to you further.

[Jubel]

im talking about the kind of timestamp where the subject writes the time and his username on paper, takes a picture of himself with it and posts it here

Usually =/= always. Don't know how to explain this to you further.

It's not hard to put whatever you want on a piece of paper with your own writing with photoshop

It's still 100% fake-able, and even 100% undetectable if done right.