Author Topic: i have some free time what coding language should i learn  (Read 1507 times)

Did you forget about C
No, that's why I said, "one of the lowest-level," and not, "the lowest-level." C++ was the specific subject, and so I focused on that.

go hard or go home, learn machine code. If you wanna be a pansy try assembly.

Go into a time machine and learn how to do BASIC.

No, that's why I said, "one of the lowest-level," and not, "the lowest-level." C++ was the specific subject, and so I focused on that.
C isn't the lowest though, it's "one of the lowest", C++ isn't as low compared to it :S
I also said C because it's still VERY widely used, as a reply to "most people would probably work with today"

use a script language
*snickers*

C isn't the lowest though, it's "one of the lowest", C++ isn't as low compared to it :S
I also said C because it's still VERY widely used, as a reply to "most people would probably work with today"
I know. Again, the subject matter was specifically C++, and so I was focused on C++. I'm aware that C and any C-variants are not at all the lowest-level possible. I also didn't intend to say that C++ is more widely used than anything else; the non-exclusive connotation intended was supposed to make that clearer. I can understand why my wording was vague, however. Also, "most people would probably work with today" is meant to modify "one of the lowest-level languages," not C++ or "languages" exclusively.

This is all semantics though, and hopefully my actual intended thought is understood now.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2015, 08:50:48 PM by otto-san »

JavaScript

Java sucks.


assembly is fun for the whole family!




I know. Again, the subject matter was specifically C++, and so I was focused on C++. I'm aware that C and any C-variants are not at all the lowest-level possible. I also didn't intend to say that C++ is more widely used than anything else; the non-exclusive connotation intended was supposed to make that clearer. I can understand why my wording was vague, however. Also, "most people would probably work with today" is meant to modify "one of the lowest-level languages," not C++ or "languages" exclusively.

This is all semantics though, and hopefully my actual intended thought is understood now.

C# does unity <3


Python is cool. Has lots of cute tricks