Author Topic: Battle for the Net! Protect Net Neutrality!  (Read 1799 times)


let me correct what I said before about these:
they email you CONSTANTLY and you can't unsubscribe from them, they constantly talk about how its the end and blah blah blah its annoying

let me correct what I said before about these:
they email you CONSTANTLY and you can't unsubscribe from them, they constantly talk about how its the end and blah blah blah its annoying
correct
also OP you're late

let me correct what I said before about these:
they email you CONSTANTLY and you can't unsubscribe from them, they constantly talk about how its the end and blah blah blah its annoying
This
I've marked so many things as spam but it keeps ending up in my inbox as well


please give me a link

I personally do not believe the government has a right to do this.

One website´s purchase of faster speeds has nothing to do with any other website´s speed.  All purchases are independent of each other.  
Quality is not free.

Net Neutrality is like saying we should all get caviar for the same price as bread.  It kills business´s freedom.

I personally do not believe the government has a right to do this.

One website´s purchase of faster speeds has nothing to do with any other website´s speed.  All purchases are independent of each other.  
Quality is not free.

Net Neutrality is like saying we should all get caviar for the same price as bread.  It kills business´s freedom.
You're assuming that 99% of ISPs aren't run by asshats. Without net neutrality, and I might as well use your brown townogy: Websites that pay get bread, same as normal. Websites that aren't are given the crumbs from the floor.
In other words, when they talk about paying for 'faster speed', they actually mean 'pay or we'll make your website's speeds act like it's the 90's'. It's the opposite.

does this thread come up at least once a month

You're assuming that 99% of ISPs aren't run by asshats. Without net neutrality, and I might as well use your brown townogy: Websites that pay get bread, same as normal. Websites that aren't are given the crumbs from the floor.
In other words, when they talk about paying for 'faster speed', they actually mean 'pay or we'll make your website's speeds act like it's the 90's'. It's the opposite.
this man is correct. Literally the only good isp is google fiber. Every other one will (and many have before in the past) throttled their customers access to sites like netflix just to have the company pay ridiculous fines for there to be the same speeds as every other website.

when they talk about paying for 'faster speed', they actually mean 'pay or we'll make your website's speeds act like it's the 90's'. It's the opposite.

Pay for less slower speed

I personally do not believe the government has a right to do this.

One website´s purchase of faster speeds has nothing to do with any other website´s speed.  All purchases are independent of each other.  
Quality is not free.

Net Neutrality is like saying we should all get caviar for the same price as bread.  It kills business´s freedom.
No, net neutrality is the idea that no web location should be prioritised or de-prioritised because all data on the Internet is equal. This has nothing to do with ISPs having to provide a certain quality of speed for a certain price. This has nothing to do with the government telling ISPs what they can and cannot charge. This has to do with ISPs not abusing their customers or businesses by denying them equal traffic to a website. There is absolutely nothing about that that is fair or trustworthy, and it should not be something that ISPs are allowed to do.

I don't really know what you mean by saying a website can purchase speed. That's not how the Internet works.

edit: don't misinterpret this as anger; the tone of this post is pretty intense but hopefully the thoughts still get across
« Last Edit: February 10, 2015, 07:18:51 PM by otto-san »

Bump

The FCC will vote soon


I already have stuffty internet. This wouldn't affect me. :cookieMonster: