Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 436485 times)

in all seriousness, they should have to pass a periodic driving test to continue driving. and so should everyone else

in all seriousness, they should have to pass a periodic driving test to continue driving. and so should everyone else
no this is false gay people shouldn't be allowed to drive

in all seriousness, they should have to pass a periodic driving test to continue driving. and so should everyone else

PRECISELY

no this is false gay people shouldn't be allowed to drive
this is true gay people are irrational and either too soft or too aggressive they cannot be trusted to drive a vehicle

we need to protect our great nation from these liberal communist fascists

in all seriousness, they should have to pass a periodic driving test to continue driving. and so should everyone else
Only problem is that this will cost the government more time and money...neither of which they work well with

Only problem is that this will cost the government more time and money...neither of which they work well with
The government also doesn't have any actual money



i understand you're trying to be funny nonnel but whats with the 'kill and eat'? like really cannibalism isnt ok and not funny
this is not a joke. I practice cannibalism everyday.

once people turn into the age of 60, their license should be revoked and in order to get it back, they must 23 other elders to death, otherwise, they cannot participate.

put that stuff on live television, it'll rake in money and keep the citizens entertained.

this is true gay people are irrational and either too soft or too aggressive they cannot be trusted to drive a vehicle

we need to protect our great nation from these liberal communist fascists

You couldn't have said it any better. Though women also fit into this, I do think it's okay to allow women to drive. When you make the active choice to be a homoloveual you also driving, among other rights. It's as simple as that.

In reality, I think 60 as a general number is too young to get driving privileges "revoked" unless they have some issue hindering them from driving. But I do sort of think that once someone is collecting social security, they should have to take a periodic driving test (say, once every 5 years) or at least a vision test. My mom's parents are both 63 right now and have absolutely no trouble driving.

My dad's dad is nearly 70 iirc and he's still an active person (driving of course, as well as travelling overseas, working, pastoral duties at a church, etc).

Yes please some of them also need booster seats

Oh my god old people drive as fast as a snail moves, I'm sitting there thinking "Why don't you just get a taxi or speed up!?"

Gay people shouldn't  drive because they can't keep straight