Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 419099 times)

a gun stole my bike and my nintendo 64 and took the engine out of my car. they are not to be trusted

Guns being illegal both has its pros and cons but which will get me a coffee

lets make it against the law to carry a gun anywhere. that way law breaking criminals wont be able to carry them around and we'll be safe forever

Quote
It should be against the law to disobey the law!

Guns are good because good people can regulate bad people with them.
Guns are bad because bad people can manifest violence and illegitimate control with them.

If everyone had a gun things would be okay.
If nobody had a gun things would be okay.

The only people who worry me regarding their possession of a firearm are: (in reverse order of how worried I am.)
Mentally disabled/disturbed individuals or adjacent quarters resident to person of such condition.
Criminals
Police

Guns are good because good people can regulate bad people with them.
Yeah but the good people could use it because they are too lazy to use their handcuffs.

Yeah but the good people could use it because they are too lazy to use their handcuffs.
vigilantism is good

vigilantism is good
i think hes talking about police murdering people because they were too lazy to arrest them for stealing something petty

i think hes talking about police murdering people because they were too lazy to arrest them for stealing something petty
This

lets make it against the law to carry a gun anywhere. that way law breaking criminals wont be able to carry them around and we'll be safe forever

Woah guys look!

Why did we never think of this before?!

I'm guessing that guns being illegal to carry does reduce the instances of small gun-related crimes... This is because nobody would bother trying to get hold of a gun as they are harder to obtain just to commit a small crime.

This is why I feel its safer for pedestrians if guns are illegal

i think hes talking about police murdering people because they were too lazy to arrest them for stealing something petty
THIS is why police should keep at least one mag filled with rubber bullets on them!

I'm guessing that guns being illegal to carry does reduce the instances of small gun-related crimes... This is because nobody would bother trying to get hold of a gun as they are harder to obtain just to commit a small crime.

This is why I feel its safer for pedestrians if guns are illegal
guns being legal in the first place, here at least, was not for protecting ourselves from each other, but protecting ourselves from the government. it was so if the people felt the government is corrupt, they would take up arms and form militias. governments aren't going to use the small stuff, and they sure don't have restricted access.

so basically, the civilians would be more at risk than less

guns being legal in the first place, here at least, was not for protecting ourselves from each other, but protecting ourselves from the government. it was so if the people felt the government is corrupt, they would take up arms and form militias. governments aren't going to use the small stuff
a fault in that though is that people would do that anyways

a fault in that though is that people would do that anyways
so illegalizing guns because they hurt people is justified because rebels can raid a government fort and get there weapons anyways?

so illegalizing guns because they hurt people is justified because rebels can raid a government fort and get there weapons anyways?

i hope this is satire