Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®

[Epicduke]

i hope this is satire

what?
i got from what he said is that if people rebel they would get their weapons anyways. if its just some random statement he made is that people would revolt anyways , then i don't see how its relevant
and would you atleast explain what you see wrong with my post? saying "I hope you're joking" gives no information about what you see wrong with it besides you not taking it seriously

sorry for any typos, I'm on my phone

[Ad Bot]

[General]

I actually heard that that was the primary reason for bearing arms...

Except nowadays its kind of obsolete, government power is so much stronger than to be overthrown with guns nowadays.

[Nonnel]

I actually heard that that was the primary reason for bearing arms...

Except nowadays its kind of obsolete, government power is so much stronger than to be overthrown with guns nowadays.

Not if there's an entire uprising lol

[General]

>> nuke threat

[Kansas]

Not if there's an entire uprising lol

Nonnel, we can't into drone

[Foxscotch]

Nonnel, we can't into drone

neither can the government if there's no one to fly it

[Kansas]

neither can the government if there's no one to fly it

I thought the concept was martial law and civie uprising. What are you implying?

[KickFlow]

I'm guessing that guns being illegal to carry does reduce the instances of small gun-related crimes... This is because nobody would bother trying to get hold of a gun as they are harder to obtain just to commit a small crime.

This is why I feel its safer for pedestrians if guns are illegal

That's why crimes with guns are so low in chicago, they have the strictest gun laws in the states!

Wait what? Gangs can obtain guns illegally?

[Foxscotch]

I thought the concept was martial law and civie uprising. What are you implying?

I'm implying that soldiers are generally pretty normal people, lol
in a situation where everyone else became violently upset with the government, why do you think soldiers wouldn't?

[Kansas]

I'm implying that soldiers are generally pretty normal people, lol
in a situation where everyone else became violently upset with the government, why do you think soldiers wouldn't?

I don't. So a military coup?

[Dannu]

[Conspiracy theory]
Government is trying to restrict gun bearing rights to civilians by arranging media attention attracting gun incidents to make sure there is no civilian opposition.
[/Conspiracy theory]

[Legodude77]

Government is trying to restrict gun bearing rights to civilians by arranging media attention attracting gun incidents to make sure there is no civilian opposition.

Fixed.

[otto-san]

[Conspiracy theory]
Government is trying to restrict gun bearing rights to civilians by arranging media attention attracting gun incidents to make sure there is no civilian opposition.
[/Conspiracy theory]

the Mainstream Media is broken... that's why i only look at americathegreatrepublicslayob ama.org.biz.ru...

[*FacePalm*]

I actually heard that that was the primary reason for bearing arms...

Except nowadays its kind of obsolete, government power is so much stronger than to be overthrown with guns nowadays.

yeah actually, one of the main purposes of the 2nd amendment was not self defense against criminals but to give rebels a fighting chance - ofc, built on fear of tyrannical govts back when they made this

[Kansas]

yeah actually, one of the main purposes of the 2nd amendment was not self defense against criminals but to give rebels a fighting chance - ofc, built on fear of tyrannical govts back when they made this

I think people's main arguement is if it requires those circumstances.

Regardless of the second amendment, this country would fall before disarmed.