Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 418023 times)



Depends on what it is. If it's cancer thats eating them inside out slowly and painfully then yes, if its some edgelord whos pissy because their parents got the wrong iPhone then no.

associated as in help them kill themselves? or associated as in trying to help them to kill themselves and failing to do so?

associated as in help them kill themselves? or associated as in trying to help them to kill themselves and failing to do so?
Assisted Self Delete is when someone (a doctor or something) helps a person commit Self Delete because people can't always do it themself


no never
Imagine this, every day 24/7 your insides are slowly eating its way out and you have no possibility of surviving it. The pain is beyond excruciating and nothing can be done about it, you can't even get out of bed. It's becoming a burden on everyone due to medical expenses and heartache. Would you really want to experience that? It could be five minutes or five years longer

Imagine this, every day 24/7 your insides are slowly eating its way out and you have no possibility of surviving it. The pain is beyond excruciating and nothing can be done about it, you can't even get out of bed. It's becoming a burden on everyone due to medical expenses and heartache. Would you really want to experience that? It could be five minutes or five years longer
Okay in most cases no
This is a case where it would be good.

i don't see why not - in cases where the victim is of relatively sound mind and with a fatal or almost fatal disease

some diseases are pure HELL

if they are fit to work then no

i don't see why not - in cases where the victim is of relatively sound mind and with a fatal or almost fatal disease

some diseases are pure HELL
If its almost then I wouldn't just yet because they could get better. If its fatal and just outright awful then with all means do so


if they are fit to work then no
bring back the means of production oink oink commie

Yes it should be legal (in most cases)

If its almost then I wouldn't just yet because they could get better. If its fatal and just outright awful then with all means do so
well it's depending on how bad the person wants to live
if they give up to the disease then...

but if they don't want to die just yet, they can get better

quite the dilemma, no?