Poll

Is it.

yes. killed by colonel mustard.
20 (22.7%)
no. killed by miss scarlett
3 (3.4%)
killed by mrs. white
5 (5.7%)
killed by reverend green
3 (3.4%)
Professor Plum.
7 (8%)
killed by mrs pearooster
11 (12.5%)
with a lead pipe
3 (3.4%)
with a revolver
6 (6.8%)
with a wrench
4 (4.5%)
with a rope
13 (14.8%)
with a dagger
3 (3.4%)
with a candlestick
10 (11.4%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Author Topic: Who killed Mr. Boddy in the study and with what?: the great debate topic™®  (Read 418312 times)

Yes, Assistant should Self Delete
Oh, that's not the question

I think no though...

if its some edgelord whos pissy because their parents got the wrong iPhone then no.

In that case they should definitely kill themselves. Hell I'll help them whether want it or not.

Depends on what it is. If it's cancer thats eating them inside out slowly and painfully then yes, if its some edgelord whos pissy because their parents got the wrong iPhone then no.

i agree with this, feel like I should say something but this sums it up

Assisted Self Delete no. I am completely against euctanasy. I am in favor of disconnecting life support, though. I am against the injection or taking in drugs or other chemical compounds that would kill you on purpose. I am in favor of letting the patient decide to be connected to life-support or to deny the intake of helpfun drugs.

lets just kill everyone so Self Delete isnt needed

lets just kill everyone so Self Delete isnt needed

Finally someone agrees


Dictating your own time of death when faced with a terminal illness is a great privilege and saves all involved pain and money.

Imagine this, every day 24/7 your insides are slowly eating its way out and you have no possibility of surviving it. The pain is beyond excruciating and nothing can be done about it, you can't even get out of bed. It's becoming a burden on everyone due to medical expenses and heartache. Would you really want to experience that? It could be five minutes or five years longer
what disease is this


Assisted Self Delete no. I am completely against euctanasy. I am in favor of disconnecting life support, though. I am against the injection or taking in drugs or other chemical compounds that would kill you on purpose. I am in favor of letting the patient decide to be connected to life-support or to deny the intake of helpfun drugs.
Why is it acceptable to stop treatment on a person and knowingly let them die a prolonged death from starvation or disease without their consent, but it's unacceptable to help a person take their life in a quick and painless manner when they can choose to do so?

what disease is this
Almost any type of cancer
Lukemia
Melanoma
Diabetes
Multiple Sclerosis
Cystic fibrosis
The list goes on
« Last Edit: October 09, 2015, 06:33:19 PM by Ipquarx »

what disease is this
The same disease that killed my aunt. Some sort of cancer that ate her insides out. I had a great uncle who had it too (or something similar) he shot himself because of the pain.

lets just kill everyone so Self Delete isnt needed
how does the last guy die though cause he cant kill himself without it being Self Delete

how does the last guy die though cause he cant kill himself without it being Self Delete
he trips and falls on accident and thats it