Here's the flaw with both of the dramas that have gone against me- they propose that I'm upset. Would someone who was upset back up their claims with articles or logical points? In the previous drama, posts were made stating I'd get banned for trolling, or for being dismissive. If that's the case, why am I back a week later, and why was the ban reason only for flaming?
Take a moment to look past your own ignorance and see the fact that I have 2 posts, whereas you now have 3 on the most recent topic, and on the tank turrets topic... LMAO, at least my post was RELEVANT to the topic, you have
FIVE posts that revolve around
me.
Like it or not, both times I have made valid points, backed up my statements, and kept through with it. The fact that you think I'm upset is actually kinda funny for me, considering majority of the time I post, I'm posting from a trampoline chair in a dorm room with only christmas lights on, wireless keyboard/mouse, and chillstep playing in the background. I even got a message or two during my ban basically saying "I agree with your point and appreciate you trying to safeguard gallery."
If you get nothing from all of that, then stop, shut up, read and ponder this fun little question-If I'm the reason the turret thread was de-railed, why was I not banned for derailing, which is a harsher penalty on the forum? I have previous bans, and Badspot historically does not like me (mostly because of some posts regarding JazZ a while back.) So given the opportunity to ban me for a longer period of time, or even permanently,
why didn't he?
Because of all of the irrelevant posts, 58% belonged to everyone else,
while 64% of my posts had nothing to do with the topic, with 71% of all of my posts purpose being soley to defend myself.
Better yet, on page five (<-- that's a link btw, for your viewing pleasure), not a SINGLE post had ANYTHING to do with the topic, and instead dealt with ME. So go on, tell me it's 100% my fault. Make another drama. Complain more.forget with me.
