Total Members Voted: 113
Nice to know you didn't read the article
Nice to know you didn't read the articleIt gets worse lol.
It's called exaggeration and it's sometimes used when you're expressing yourself
i knew that no gay couple was involved, but hypothetically, if i were to refuse to cater to a gay couples' wedding then i would be considered a patriot by republicans and i would be given thousands of dollars for standing up to the "homoloveual agenda"
i would be considered a patriot by republicans and i would be given thousands of dollars for standing up to the "homoloveual agenda"
No. What they're doing is illegal. By law, you cannot discriminate based on loveual orientation. Imagine if they said they wouldn't cater black or interracial weddings because of their religion. It wouldn't hold up and refusing to cater gay weddings shouldn't either.
I don't think that counts as an exaggeration.
If you think I actually believe that the motive behind homoloveuals is to build a master race then you're the stupid one
"-something stupid-""That's stupid""You're stupid for saying that it's stupid."
the only consequence being someone else exercising their freedom on you.
That's what's happening nowPeople are expressing their freedom to protest and not buy from them