Author Topic: Alright, so can we talk about annoying SJWs for a second?  (Read 9231 times)


Cultural appropriation is a loving joke lol, just don't give a stuff about her and she'll shut up. If she doesn't you can report her for harassment.

Fun fact: SJWs are exclusively white

Fun fact: SJWs are exclusively white

what about that chick that said she was ”transmonday” :^)

what about that chick that said she was ”transmonday” :^)

what about that chick that said she was ”transmonday” :^)
She had the privilege to say that because she said she was not mentally white.

I actually run an anti-SJW/feminist page on Instagram. I'm not going to publicly mention the name of it, but if you are interested, you may DM PM me.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2015, 08:26:36 AM by Col. Derontchi »


I actually run an anti-SJW/feminist page on Instagram. I'm not going to publicly mention the name of it, but if you are interested, you may DM me.
lol

I actually run an anti-SJW/feminist page on Instagram. I'm not going to publicly mention the name of it, but if you are interested, you may DM me.
Aren't you so edgy? I bet you harass women on twitter too because it makes you feel good.

In some variants of Russian Roulette, you don't pull the trigger once; the gun is handed around in a cyclical fashion until someone gets unlucky.  It's used in extreme situations where only X people can survive and you have a group larger than X (or as a game by handicaps with no self-preservation).  Thus, someone will die, and your odds of surviving are dependant on how large the group is, how many chambers the gun has, and what position you are in the cycle.

For a six-chamber gun and with two or three players, all players have equal chances of surviving.  This may seem counterintuitive, since in a two-player "game" the second player always has worse chances than the first player.

Player 1   Player 2
1 in 61 in 5
1 in 41 in 3
1 in 21 in 1


This seeming-paradox is resolved by two facts: Player 1 always goes before Player 2, thus balancing the odds, and the chamber that the round is in is predetermined before anyone ever even pulls the trigger.  The players simply don't know which chamber it's in.

With four players, however, the six-cylinder "game" changes dramatically.  Because players one and two will both pull the trigger twice, their odds are both 2/6 of catching the bullet, while players three and four both only have a 1/6 chance of catching the bullet.


However, the statistic seems to use an eight-cylinder gun, which is fair for a group of 2, 4, or 8 participants.  For a three-player group, the first and second players are once again at a disadvantage, with a 3/8 chance each of shooting themselves in the head, while player three only has a 2/8 chance of doing so.  A five-player game puts players 1, 2, and 3 at a disadvantage, with a 2/8 chance of death as opposed to players 4 and 5's 1/8 chance of death.


As for the validity of using statistics like a crutch, claiming that it's unsafe to date men because you might be dating a rapist is dubious at best.  It's difficult to find good figures, but somewhere around 2/3rds of all rapes were committed by someone that the victim already knew.  So I suppose the moral of this post is: it's safer to be the fourth person in a five-player game of Russian Roulette with an eight-cylinder revolver than it is to assume you will never be raped by a member of your own family.

What a depressing moral.

The 1 in 6 or 1 in 4 or whatever isn't even accurate. The actual statistic is like 1 in 500. One rape is too many, of course, but it's not the epidemic like feminists/SJWs like to believe it is.


-snip-
10/10. absolutely perfect

you could not have handled that better

10/10. absolutely perfect

you could not have handled that better
Apparently she's not coming back to school either, just found that out today.