Everybody here things he raped a dog without any evidential proof. I'm defending him because the main point in this topic, could be a lie.
so you're defending him for lying?
dragonoid you don't seem to get that you are defending someone for:
1. forcing himself on a dog
2. lying about forcing himself on a dog
you have no reason to defend him, and people are going to believe he did it because he himself admitted to it. when a criminal admits that he committed the crime in question, the police don't think he could be lying. it's the same thing when someone that people know is not a 'normal' (i swear to god if you act like it's because he's a furry) person admits to something like this, people will believe them
if someone with a sarcastic personality admits it: people won't believe them