Poll

Favorite Swholli Reivew(s)

God's Not Dead
14 (53.8%)
The Fault in our Stars
0 (0%)
Insidious Parts 1 and 2
0 (0%)
Twilight
2 (7.7%)
Will Jurassic World Be Good?
0 (0%)
The Star Wars Special
8 (30.8%)
The Six Nights of Swholloween
2 (7.7%)

Total Members Voted: 26

Author Topic: Re: [Swholli's Movie Reviews] - The Worst Christmas Movie Ever  (Read 8957 times)


Dude you're hilarious.

how's the progress on fifty shades of gay?

how's the progress on fifty shades of gay?

Painful, but going. It's such a terrible movie, its honestly hard to express the terrible without going too off topic.

Ok, I'm getting really tired of the Youtube copyright system bullstuff and I just wanted to vent a little bit.



You see this stuff?

Appeals. My original dispute to these lawyer ass hats wasn't enough. I specifically would say: "yo, this is a movie I don't own, I acknowledge that, but the majority of the video is me talking about said movie and giving my opinion and critical brown townysis. This is what we call fair use. I want to be able to get paid for my video content since I put the time and work into this video and I have that option to monetize available to me. "

But no, they still have the nerve, even after viewing my video to say "nah kid, sorry, we just really want it taken down." Which to me sounds more like they just don't like that I am bad-mouthing their film and given they have the legal upper-hand at the moment, still try to take it down. So I appeal.

Not only have I had to endure copyright appeal after copyright appeal after copyright appeal (all of which I've won due to parties either getting their head out of their asses and realizing that fair use is real, or just forgetting they made a claim and letting it expire after a month), but now they've changed the layout on youtube that tells me about my appeals.

See, I use Twilight as an example here because I appealed that forgeter back when I put it up and so it was before the change of design. Originally when I viewed it, I was able to see the date in which the copyright abusers had to file against my appeal and have it removed due to copyright infringement. Usually at this point someone will either realize it was stupid to flag my video and even cause me to appeal and will withdraw their claims. If they don't, Youtube gives them exactly a months time to finalize their claim or whatever and after that it expires and I'm allowed to continue monetizing my video (which is ridiculous in its own right cause that's a month worth of views I could be getting paid for, but I'm stuck waiting for some richardwad at Universal Pictures to decide to just not do anything).

But now as you can see, there is no longer a date there. Because it was before the design change, I know that the date for Twilight was June 6th, or this Saturday, so I should be able to continue monetizing it. That is of course if they still allow that month anymore. It might be now they can allow it to go indefinitely, thus effectively allowing me to not make any money on my own work just because it happens to contain their source (which, again, totally allowed in fair use scenarios if it's a critical review) and because I criticized their source.

Jurassic World is a whole other ball game.



Not only do I not know when the appeal period will be over if ever, but the fact of the matter is their calling me out for use of a trailer. I am critically looking at their trailer. The thing they want to use to sell their movie and be seen by as many people possible so that they can get money by people seeing the movie. I AM NOT EVEN SAYING "DON'T GO SEE THIS MOVIE," I AM JUST SAYING "THIS IS WHAT IT NEEDS TO DO TO BE GOOD, LET'S FIND OUT IF I'M RIGHT WHEN WE GO TO SEE IT."

I'm getting ready to leave Youtube honestly. I've heard these stories before, but I've never truly experienced the frustration until now.

It sucks because, I've been on Youtube for literally ten years now. I started my account in 05, it'd feel like I was leaving something I've worked so hard to create all these years. Plus I don't know if I'm big enough a content creator to garner the kind of audience that Youtube has, outside of Youtube. If I leave I might never be able to break 480 subscribers, because Youtube is such a giant in video sites some people don't even know others exist.

This is literally the most frustrating thing about being a content creator right now, especially if you're in comedy. If you want to do reviews, or make parody, or really anything that needs to acknowledge popular culture, you better hope your reference is under 20 seconds, otherwise they might flag your ass.

youtube in general is incredibly stuffty but the community is larger than like...vimeo or some video site so no one can really leave

it's horrible

that is absolutely dumb. that should be covered under fair use. it's critique/review

it almost seems like these are big bad companies taking this stuff down because they know they can get away with it

i just copy-pasted this a bunch and got some of my videos' copyright claims removed:
Quote
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use
apparently the lawyers are stuff because i had a copyright strike that was taken down like 20 days after that being sent
also yeah, we need to switch to vimeo. youtube is so critical over everything. did you notice the slower uploading times?

well youtube (google) is a private company, and the guidelines are just guidelines.
they can remove any and all things they please for no reason at all. even a suspicion of possible copyright issues, its easier to just remove.

its really your fault for not being popular enough. if you bring enough hits to the site for google's add money, they would bump your pending approval a little quicker.

its really your fault for not being popular enough.
yes totally he can just poof become popular

yes totally he can just poof become popular

Yeah, that's the thing about popularity: it's partially blind.



On topic, what a sucky situation. I enjoyed listening to your reviews.

well youtube (google) is a private company, and the guidelines are just guidelines.
they can remove any and all things they please for no reason at all. even a suspicion of possible copyright issues, its easier to just remove.

its really your fault for not being popular enough. if you bring enough hits to the site for google's add money, they would bump your pending approval a little quicker.
victim blaming 101

its really your fault for not being popular enough. if you bring enough hits to the site for google's add money, they would bump your pending approval a little quicker.

The pending isn't the problem I have to be honest. It's the fact that they see my video has their content with the automatic content detector thing. Like cool, I get that, I could totally be uploading their movie or something, like flag that stuff post haste.

But then when I send the initial appeal, they clearly say that someone affiliated with the party that's claimed the copyright will view my content and verify my story (when I say this is fair use because it's a critique, which by definition is fair use exactly- if you notice the Jurassic World video they've only claimed twenty seconds of footage, the supposed "golden rule" of sampling without getting sued). That means some dude from Universal's online legal team has seen the video after I was like "nah this is legal," saw that it was, indeed, a critique, and still chose to overrule that and say "nah, this is still totes not ok."

Plus, if you noticed, when I linked to Jon and Doug's videos, two highly successful and big Youtube partners, I had to link to blip.tv's mirror of the video, because both of theirs had been removed for copyright reasons. Jontron and the Nostalgia Critic have to even deal with this, and that's literally their livelihood. I'm just fed up with this copyright system. I get wanting to take down videos that blatantly use stolen material and attempt to monetize that, but when I put my hard work into a video that literally contains less than a minute of footage from a trailer, I want to be allowed to do so because I'm within the parameters of the law.

The first flag is automated. I'll deal. The second was from a real person who either doesn't understand, or more likely, refused to acknowledged the law because they have the power to do so.





500 Subscribers!

I want to do something special for this milestone, but I'm not sure what.