Author Topic: Complaint against Badspot  (Read 13646 times)

I've been thinking about this for 4 years, I've decided to release my complaint against Badspot.

There are a number of things I can't stand about Badspot, and I would just love to share them with you. By way of introduction, let me just say that Badspot is a being who invents nothing, originates nothing, and improves nothing. All he does is subvert existing lines of power and information. The implications of uppish, dodgy collaborationism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. You've heard me say that his fans are all the worst sorts of macabre simpletons there are. True, that's a cheap shot, but too often they do think and behave in ways that reinforce that image. Some of Badspot's adherents have privately reassured me that Badspot isn't as bellicose as he sounds. Rather, they contend, Badspot is just playing the cards that he thinks he needs to. I don't buy that excuse. Badspot may have started as non-bellicose, but he's now totally invested in honeyfuggling us into believing that one hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism. Consider, for example, how if anything, to Badspot, the fact that his insidious missives have yielded little in the way of positive results—and that they undeniably have dangerous long-term consequences—is not a reason to stop and reassess. Rather, it's a call to action; it's an opportunity for Badspot to funnel significant amounts of money to peccable clinchpoops.

Many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently cullionly or inherently vainglorious. Alas, Badspot is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Badspot drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that we get more from Badspot than we do from most parvanimous, impolitic knaves. We get more lies, more distortions, more fear, more hatred, more division. We get Badspot behaving like Badspot.

I want to say a few things about Badspot's scurrilous maneuvers. First, his maneuvers engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. Second, they replace intellectual integrity with slatternly sloganeering. Third, they create a factitious demand for his unsympathetic whinges. I could list a few more things, but you get the picture. The important part is that I have long suggested we seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by Badspot's obloquies might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. Badspot, however, rejects this suggestion as a ginned-up effort to undermine his authority. To that I say, Badspot's excesses, emotional swings, casual cruelties, and hair-trigger outbursts make me think that nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that Badspot will promote rambunctious ideologies such as exclusivism. That's too big of a subject to get into here so let me instead discuss how I've managed to come up with a way in which Badspot's essays could be made useful. His essays could be used by the instructors of college courses as a final examination of sorts. Any student who can't find at least 20 errors of fact or fatuous statement automatically flunks. Extra credit goes to students who realize that Badspot truly believes that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. I hope you realize that that's just a coldhearted pipe dream from an unsophisticated pipe and that in the real world, Badspot all but forces his toadies to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. Interestingly, his toadies don't much seem to mind being given such termagant orders. I guess it's hard to free demented cretins from the chains they revere. A related observation is that Badspot's demands are not witty satire, as he would have you believe. They're simply the sinister ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking.

Badspot avers that he opposes crafty humanity-haters who make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. That's nothing more than ear candy. It's designed to gently stroke listeners, to get them to purr like kittens. The reality is that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, would never take a job working for Badspot. Given his abhorrent, obtuse epigrams, who would want to? In my observations upon special interestism, I have expressed no opinion thus far of the mode of its extinguishment or melioration. I will note, however, though I still have nothing to propose, that scapegoatism, poststructuralism, and heathenism follow Badspot's footsteps. Wherever he goes, such things are sure to sprout up. The implication is that I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to foster mutual understanding. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that his associates actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these kinds of bumptious maniacs are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world before long. In reality, of course, Badspot's plan is to break down traditional values. Badspot's epigones are moving at a frightening pace toward the total implementation of that agenda, which includes perverting the course of justice.

Isn't it odd that discourteous philosophunculists, whose prudish lifestyle will gag free speech some day, are immune from censure? Why is that? Any honest person who takes the time to think about that question will be forced to conclude that Badspot's attendants claim to have no choice but to sensationalize all of the issues. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, nocuous saboteurs. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand.

By the way, when it comes to Badspot's equivocations, I, for one, clearly claim that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to denounce those who claim that his memoranda are not worth getting outraged about. The sooner we do that the better because Badspot once said that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that Badspot claims that we ought to worship philopolemical nitwits as folk heroes. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.

Badspot is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet I would like to believe that he acts with our interests in mind. I really would. But Badspot sure makes it difficult to believe such things. For instance, he wants to muzzle his enemies. This desire is implanted in a part of his brain that's immune to reason or argument. Consequently, there's no chance that we can get him to see that this makes me fearful that I might someday find myself in the crosshairs of his pro-censorship gibes. (To be honest, though, it wouldn't be the first time.)

Badspot has long been getting away with plaguing our minds. I urge all of my beautiful and loyal fans to walk with me side-by-side as we march up the steps of justice to right this unconscionable wrong and prove to the world that when I hear Badspot's comrades parrot the party line—that we should all bear the brunt of Badspot's actions—I see them not as people but as machines. The appropriate noises are coming out of their larynges, but their brains are not involved as they would be if they were thinking about how I'd like very much to respond to Badspot's claim that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. Unfortunately, taking into account Badspot's background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Badspot would not be able to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, Badspot is growing increasingly adept at dissolving the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. The steady drizzle of depressing data continues: I have in front of me a document that indicates that by the end of the decade, Badspot will reduce meaningful political discussions to “my team versus your team” identity-based politics. Before that fatidic time arrives, we must let all of Badspot's potential victims know that we can never return to the past. And if we are ever to move forward to the future, we honestly have to come to the aid of justice.

Don't kid yourself: Badspot's trucklers have the gall to accuse me of defiling the air and water in the name of profit. Were these baleful thieves born without a self-awareness gene? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: Badspot's grand plan is to cause hypersensitive subversion to gather momentum on college campuses. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, uppity ratbags often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Badspot enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries.

For the sake of argument, let's pretend that Badspot is not a lubricious, savage pautener. There are various philosophical arguments that one could use to contradict that assuption, but perhaps the best involves the observation that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an intolerant, malodorous wacko. It's a fact. The depth of Badspot's disdain for the public and the height of his hubris are evident in his attempts to defuse or undermine incisive critiques of his liberticidal behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. Do give that some thought.

EDIT:
Old reference: http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=161892.0
Website Used: http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
« Last Edit: May 18, 2015, 11:21:05 PM by Bobah »

Woah, slow down buddy.
Belongs in Drama.
DISREGARD THAT I SUCK roosterS
« Last Edit: May 18, 2015, 10:59:41 PM by joe411 »

TL;DR

also what lol
« Last Edit: May 18, 2015, 10:57:14 PM by NessNet »

it looks like he's joking

NessNet I don't think you understand, I have many complaints about you also.

This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about NessNet but will, in most cases, confirm them. What I want to bring out in the text that follows are two core ideas: (1) that shameless, unrealistic dimwitted-types all over the country are now having an absolute field day with their new-found freedoms supposedly granted by NessNet's homilies and (2) that his ideologies serve only to make people increasingly pusillanimous. At some point, we'll reach a “pusillanimous event horizon” where everything in the universe will be pusillanimous. At that point, it will no longer matter that NessNet's expedients have proven to be a complete disaster in both theory and practice. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: NessNet relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do NessNet's dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, NessNet would not have been able to conceal the fact that there's something fishy about his subliminal psywar campaigns. I think NessNet is up to something, something wretched and perhaps even horny.

NessNet's view is that human rights can best be protected by suspending them altogether. If NessNet's pretentious gofers had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would sincerely be rendered revolting to their better feelings. NessNet's escapades have been a millstone around our neck for quite some time. Now that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter so let me corroborate it by saying that NessNet may introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms right after he reads this letter. Let him. By next weekend, I will expose all of NessNet's filthy, subversive, and destructive activities. He's capable of running only two things: (1) his mouth and (2) something good into the ground. NessNet has not failed to do either of these at every opportunity. This suggests, at least to me, that I take an uncharitable attitude towards his parasitic animadversions. In fact, I have said that to NessNet on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops bringing discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives.

If NessNet doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to inaugurate an era of headstrong Zendicism, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then NessNet will grasp the concept that I'm willing to accept that there is no disguising the fact that he is a bit teched. I'm even willing to accept that for once, he should try thinking instead of vociferating. But one of his most loyal servitors is known to have remarked, “Chauvinism is indispensable for the formation of citizens and for the preservation of our free institutions.” And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that we ought to weaken the critical links in NessNet's nexus of brazen Leninism. That'll make NessNet think once—I would have said “twice”, but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before cementing the foundation of our currently metastasizing police state into the law of the land.

Sometimes I think that NessNet is simply a willing pawn of those rotten, brown-nosing loblollies who call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. I typically drop that willing-pawn notion, however, whenever I remember that we must do everything we can to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. Fortunately, telling the truth about him is an activity that's right in my wheelhouse. I even know where to begin: by informing people everywhere that NessNet is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! NessNet keeps repeating over and over again that he is omnipotent. This verbigeration is symptomatic of an excessive love of Titoism and indicates to me that NessNet avers that propagandism is the answer to all of our problems. Perhaps propagandism is indeed the answer but only if the question was, “What's the moral equivalent of letting NessNet declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps?”

What we are dealing with here is fashion, politics, and money. Only a true-blue coldhearted, bestial costive-type or one who is utterly clueless about colonialism could claim otherwise. NessNet drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that NessNet is often accused of discrediting legitimate voices in the elitism debate. His collaborators usually respond with a message along the lines of, “So what? At least NessNet isn't ruining my entire day.” I suppose there's an argument to be made for that, but aren't we forgetting that NessNet tries to make his op-ed pieces more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden?

Do you think I'm the only one who wants to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity? I assure you, I am not. But NessNet says that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. As usual, he can be counted on to wrap every actual fact in six layers of embellishment. The truth is that I correctly predicted that NessNet would force us to do things or take stands against our will. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon.

NessNet's principles cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that NessNet is above everyone else. Calling NessNet's confreres argumentative mobocrats may be accurate, but NessNet says that education and open-mindedness are some kind of liability. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, “They're not in here!”?

I hereby publicly condemn NessNet's officious theories. In doing so, I publicly proclaim that he has a stout belief in astrology, the stars representing the twinkling penumbra of NessNet's incandescent belief in gnosticism. Some people consider NessNet's prank phone calls a necessary evil, but the truth is that NessNet does not content himself with establishing tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion. Rather, NessNet seeks to ransack people's homes. If he does, that will be the end of the general public knowing that he thinks it's good that his pontifications ensure that there can never in the future be accord, unity, or a common, agreed-upon destiny among the citizens of this once-great nation. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: We must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that brown townogy, the chains symbolize NessNet's irritable diatribes, and the light represents the goal of showing him how he is as wrong as wrong can be.)

Of all the delusions I have ever known, the most incoherent is the idea that everyone with a different set of beliefs from NessNet's is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. Still, that doesn't prevent NessNet from rewarding mediocrity. This is not the same as saying that it's time to step things up a notch and listen to others, although that, too, is true. To convert freedom of speech from a human right into a tool of oppression that must be blunted by force is an injustice. If an attempt to test another formula for silencing serious opposition isn't ethically bankrupt, it certainly is inhumane.

NessNet has inadvertently provided us with an instructive example that I find useful in illustrating certain ideas. By bombarding unsuspecting civilians with vicious waves of chemicals or disease, NessNet makes it clear that if I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that anyone who believes that NessNet commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface is kidding himself. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. NessNet's politics epitomize all that is pharisaical in the world. May we never forget this if we are to deny NessNet and his factotums a chance to use both overt and covert deceptions to manufacture and compile daunting lists of imaginary transgressions committed against NessNet.

I'm going to watch how this topic turns out.
*screech* Better pull up my chair.
Also holy stuff how are you typing a million werds a menut

this is so poetic, it should be used as a document to interpret in a history course.

it looks like he's joking
yeah, did you guys even read it lol

even a quick skim is enough, and it looks like hes using a paragraph generator


-woah man-
This is obviously a copypasta or some stuff idk.

But srs man what happen yo?

I don't know how he's generating these things but it's hilarious.


[insert name] I don't think you understand, I have many complaints about you also.

[insert smart sounding template]

I only just started reading this, and now I'm starting to laugh.

"Macabre simpletons"? You didn't even use macabre correctly! Stop trying to sound smart.
are you being serious

I only just started reading this, and now I'm starting to laugh.

"Macabre simpletons"? You didn't even use macabre correctly! Stop trying to sound smart.

Joe411 you're not off the hook.

Please pardon the hidebound overtones that will be found throughout this letter, but I proclaim that we should shift our focus here to the role of environmental and situational factors in triggering the maladaptive and violent behaviors that Joe411 exhibits whenever he attempts to plunge us into the dark abyss of annihilation. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that by refusing to act, by refusing to call for a return to the values that made this country great, we are giving him the power to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. Is there a way to counter his biggety initiatives? Oh yes, there is a way. It's really quite simple and can be done by any individual. It doesn't cost a thing, monetarily. It requires only time, diligence, and a desire to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let Joe411 create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration.

Should we worry that Joe411 wants to promote a politics of defeat and demoralization, of pessimism and selfishness? In a word, yes. And that's not just because he enjoys the sense of control that comes from forcing someone else to do things the way he wants them done but also because Joe411's victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Joe411's sympathizers, who loudly proclaim that newspapers should report only on items Joe411 agrees with. Regardless of those grotty proclamations, the truth is that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to keep the faith.

Joe411 keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to dominate the whole earth and take possession of all its riches. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, when you tell Joe411's apostles that many fractious jerks take their marching orders directly from Joe411, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that I've heard numerous complaints about his behavior. Many people I've talked to have complained that Joe411 comports himself like a filthy pig, heedless of all needs but his own. Among these needs the paramount one seems to be the need to make bargains with the devil. This backs up my point that if we don't bring him down a peg, then he will soon become unstoppable. No borders will be able to detain him. No united global opinion will be able to isolate him. No international police or juridical institutions will be able to interdict him.

The implications of snarky, ophidian cannibalism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. Concrete examples abound of ways to create bridges between marginalized people and then extensions outward to broader constituencies. For instance, consider that I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Joe411 will ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas in the immediate years ahead. He all but forces his advocates to mortgage away our future. Interestingly, Joe411's advocates don't much seem to mind being given such quixotic orders. I guess it's hard to free the most uncontrollable opportunists you'll ever see from the chains they revere. A related observation is that despite the dominant narrative within Joe411's pauperism outfit that students should be molded into “change agents” to promote Joe411's corrupt agenda, history tells a different story. History tells us that Joe411 wants us to believe that sooner than you think it will be considered cool to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. Yes, things will be that way if we choose to believe that. I choose not to believe that. I choose to believe that Joe411 behaves like an immature, overgrown, and undisciplined child. Every store in the country should have that chiseled in large letters over the entryway. Maybe then people would grasp that a central point of Joe411's belief systems is the notion that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that although I disapprove of what he says, I will defend to the death his right to say it. Or, at a minimum, I'll make some changes here. Okay, that's not quite the same as “defending to the death,” but at least it demonstrates that I can obviously suggest how Joe411 ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Joe411 himself.

Joe411's claim that you and I are morally inferior to pusillanimous polluters is factually unsupported and politically motivated. Let's be frank: If Joe411 can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. My long-term goal is to make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, Joe411 sells the supposed merits of masochism on the basis of rhetoric, not evidence. The evidence, however belated, is now in, and the evidence says that for the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, who roam the globe without papers, rights, or citizenship, the crucial issue is not that we detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Joe411's sanctimonious, petulant little schemes. Rather, these stranded souls simply want everyone to acknowledge that I want to unify our community. Joe411, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it.

If you're the type who dares to think for yourself then you've probably already determined that I defy the gormless dorks who destabilize the already volatile social fabric that Joe411 purportedly aims to save, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent. I can't help but wonder: Why does everyone hate him? Is it because of his business practices, exclusivity, disloyalty, disrespect, or because he keeps trying to take down the power grid? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that he has stated that might makes right. That's just pure antidisestablishmentarianism. Well, in Joe411's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that Joe411 has vowed that in a matter of days he'll promote the lie of Titoism. This is hardly news; Joe411 has been vowing that for months with the regularity of a metronome. What is news is that he wants to prohibit any discussion of her attempts to make our lives miserable. While it is clear why he wants that to be a taboo subject, it doesn't really matter why Joe411 wants to hold annual private conferences in which audacious, loquacious gossipmongers are invited to present their “research”. Whether it's due to a misplaced faith in defeatism, bribes paid to Joe411 by intemperate, baleful dumbbells, or nagging from some of the scabrous stirrers in his plunderbund, the fact remains that that's what Joe411 wants. What I want, in contrast, is to notify you that he likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about “human rights” and the evils of terrorism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, Joe411 invariably instructs his adulators to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual it makes perfect sense in light of Joe411's brown-nosing methods of interpretation.

While compared to crazy publishers of hate literature like Joe411, every entrepreneur  is a man of honor, it is as obvious as the nose on your face that he exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. I fail to grasp why Joe411 has so much difficulty understanding that. Perhaps it's because the legality of his Pecksniffian refrains seems dubious. Alas, I am not aware of any lawsuit that has challenged them so all we can say for now is that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to Joe411's hatchet jobs. It applies to everything he says and does. You don't have to say anything specifically about Joe411 for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should disabuse him of the notion that the goodness of something is in direct proportion only to the amount of stoicism in said thing.

Joe411 justifies his prudish generalizations with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Joe411's claim that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication then he will stifle the free inquiry of science and the application of its discoveries towards bettering the lot of mankind. It is quite common today to hear people express themselves as follows: “Reason, not make-believe, is the best way to deal with the real evils of our world.”

I don't normally want to expose anyone to rigorous sarcasm, satire and disdain, but Joe411 deserves it. His chums portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that Joe411 assumes that mandarinism is the catholicon for all the world's ills. The flip side of that assumption is that he has stated that he and his spinmeisters should ultimately decide what opinions are acceptable or unacceptable. I find such declaratory statements quite telling. They tell me that Joe411 professes it would be best for all of us if he were to spread ruin widely through the land. Such sentiments have no place in our community, let alone in our world. I wish that all of the amoral renitent-types who hold similar views would stop to think about how we can no longer afford to do nothing about Joe411's money-grubbing politics. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and hinder the power of pudibund poseurs like him.

The downward spiral of society and the concomitant growing threat of irreligionism are the natural results of Joe411's jealous schemes. By somewhat the same token, although I admit it's not an exact parallel, even if scientific evidence established that the moon is made of green cheese, it would still be the case that I have nothing more to say on that issue. We can therefore conclude that some people have indicated that words fail me in describing my pure distaste for Joe411's projects and cantankerous vaporings. I can neither confirm nor deny that statement, but I can say that you don't need me to tell you that Joe411 likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why I feel that we should let him prattle on about how his hypocritical lynch mob is a benign and charitable agency. At this point, such exsufflicate jibber jabber is harmless enough, albeit a little unsettling. Nevertheless, it does demonstrate how I am utterly shocked and angered by Joe411's high-handed improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. Now for some parting advice: Look at the facts. brown townyze the arguments. Think about the motives of the people who are telling you that Joe411's equivocations won't be used for political retribution. And have confidence in yourself. Remember, Joe411's paroxysms are a parody of original thought.