Author Topic: Complaint against Badspot  (Read 13455 times)

I'm dumb.
Why did I report this thread.

I have a feeling that this isn't legit, but I think the OP may have a future in creative writing.

what are you using to generate these

Write one about me, too.

Write one about me, too.

Ok, but you aren't gonna like it.

I am angry. Angry that events have transpired that lead me to write this statement. Let's review the errors in Akio's statements in order. First, the best gauge of the value of my attitudes, the sincerity of my convictions, and the force of my will is the hostility I receive from blockish vendors of heathenism. There appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that Akio has been seen annihilating a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that I, speaking as someone who is not an adversarialism-prone weirdo, would never take a job working for Akio. Given his rude, intellectually challenged campaigns of terror, who would want to?

What frightens you more: Akio's morally repugnant, hubristic denunciations or the fact that Akio lies routinely—even under oath? If you were to ask me, I'd say the latter but only because our attempts to create bridges between marginalized people and then extensions outward to broader constituencies have so far served only as a divertissement for Akio and his serfs. It follows from this that there is not much demand for independent thinkers in his band. But it goes further than that; he fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, Akio conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community.

I have always been an independent thinker. I'm not influenced by popular trends, the media, or even so-called undisputed facts when parroted by others. Maybe that streak of independence is what first enabled me to see that Akio does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, he discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent. I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to give you some background information about him. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that our battle with Akio is a battle between spiritualism and anti-intellectualism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that if Akio wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults.

Should we blindly trust such judgmental, boisterous babblers? By refusing to act, by refusing to lead Akio to resipiscence, we are giving Akio the power to establish a world government complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, and numerous other agencies that hand over the country to meretricious, power-hungry dimbulbs. We must stop him now. Neville Chamberlain's 1938 capitulation to Riddler at Munich demonstrated that appeasement just puts off a final reckoning and gives an enemy time to gain strength. That's why it is imperative that we build a new understanding that can transport us to tomorrow.

Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that if my memory serves me correctly, every time Akio spouts some nonsense about how we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as he, the effect is that his representatives become even more loyal to him. Sociologists refer to the phenomenon of increased devotion to an odious, vilipensive theory at the very hour of its destruction by external evidence as “cognitive dissonance”. I call it proof that Akio's histrionics are a sociopolitical tragicomedy. On the one hand, they alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with Akio's current “reality”, but on the other hand, they distract people from making a serious brown townysis of the situation. The most entertaining part, though, is that it has been said that some day, Akio will turn his back on those who need him the most. I, for one, believe that to be true. I also believe that he's a pretty good liar most of the time. However, Akio tells so many lies, he's bound to trip himself up someday.

Akio's devotees are not technically lusk, dastardly sluggards but rather randy ragamuffins. I proclaim that there is a small—yet not entirely insignificant—difference. We must always be mindful of the special needs of the least privileged members of our anti-Akio movement. We need even their help to shoo Akio away like the annoying bug that he is. He wants me to stop trying to exercise due diligence in contributing to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. Instead, he'd rather I react, on cue, to the trigger words that he has inserted into my mind by dint of endless repetition. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily.

So, is Akio a professional simpleton or merely a well-meaning amateur? I guess it just boils down to the question: How shrewish can Akio be? We must indeed ask ourselves questions like that before it's too late, before Akio gets the opportunity to ensure that there can never in the future be accord, unity, or a common, agreed-upon destiny among the citizens of this once-great nation. Rigid adherence to dogmatic purity will lead only to disunity while we clearly need unity to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. He once tried convincing me that we'll be moved by some heartfelt words on the glories of Leninism. Does he think I was born yesterday? I mean, it seems pretty obvious that I, for one, have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against Akio's accusations. Of course, some people I know say that he is a bad role model for children. Others argue that I hold Akio's probity in question. At this point the distinction is largely academic given that he would have us deliver the atrocities of caciquism to the world. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most obstinate and sinister thing!

Akio's ploys are based on hate. Hate, conformism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. I can no longer get very excited about any revelation of Akio's hypocrisy or crookedness. It's what I've come to expect by now. Essentially, engaging Akio in intelligent debate is far from easy. The last time I saw someone try, furious hatred, frenzied personal attacks, emotionalism, and defiance of reason and fact were all on display in spades, and they were all directed at this one, poor, frightened person. I wish Akio would more calmly accept the fact that he has once again been putting increased disruptive powers in the hands of disorganized hermits. Although for him, this behavior is as common as that of adulterous politicians seeking forgiveness from God and spouse, I must ask that his plenipotentiaries embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of sadism. I know they'll never do that so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness.

Griping about Akio will not make him stop trying to move love-crazed sesquipedalianism from the jaded fringe into a realm of respectability. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to create a regime of warped Jacobinism. As far as he's concerned, facts and evidence are subordinate to, and mediated by, a “discourse”. There are no right or wrong answers, just competitive discourses. If that's the case, then perhaps Akio would like to explain why he disbelieves that our national media is controlled by what I call contemptible goof-offs. That's why you probably haven't heard that many, many people have been hurt by Akio for daring to knock some sense into him. In fact, there are so many such people that even listing their names would take more space than I can afford in this letter. In their honor, though, I will say that Akio has stated that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with his requirements is a crafty jerk. I find such declaratory statements quite telling. They tell me that ill-natured beggars spread rumors, gossip, and stories that are undeniably false. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: Akio and his infelicific hirelings.

If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less spineless than Akio. Someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Akio. The memo spells out his plans to cashier anyone who tries to deal with him appropriately. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that Akio thinks it would be a great idea to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. This is not the same as saying that unlike him, I believe in individual responsibility, the rule of law, and fair play, although that, too, is true. Akio hates us with a hatred so steady and deadly that it consumes in him all sense of time and place. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2015, 11:01:05 PM by Bobah »

I'm dying. Badspot, let this man go on until he's written about every one who has every played Blockland.


Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that anyone who believes that NessNet commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface is kidding himself. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to.
I've only read this part.

What the absolute forget.

I demand one made about me.

Thanks man. What site are you using to generate these?

Make one about me, no one knows me anyway

Although, ultimately, you will need to make up your own mind about Bobah, I have a number of things to say that you may find useful. The key point of the following exposition is that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that my general thesis is that Bobah's insanity has reached record levels, so to speak. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: I have a problem with Bobah's use of the phrase, “We all know that…”. With this phrase, it doesn't need to prove its claim that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong; it merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, it has quite a clever technique for concealing its intent to twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. Specifically, its technique is to delve into philological discussions about comparative abstractive norms whenever the conversation veers too close towards revealing that we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by Bobah and its fans or we pursue virtue and knowledge. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that I am sick of our illustrious “leaders” treading on eggshells so as not to upset Bobah. Here's what I have to say to them: In the midst of our mighty struggle to deliver new information about Bobah's sneaky, unbridled conjectures, I have seen too many people stand on the sidelines and mouth pious irrelevancies and sanctimonious trivialities. I have watched too many people accept without challenge Bobah's apolaustic, insensitive claim that it holds a universal license that allows it to implant within the government a set of fifth columnists who are devoted to its dream of saddling the economy with crippling debt. And I have observed too many people fail to realize that if Bobah is going to make an emotional appeal then it should also include a rational argument.

Bobah is known for focusing too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. This is not only a grotesque betrayal of the principles that Bobah itself claims to uphold but a clear demonstration of how Bobah dreams of a time when they'll be free to destroy the heart and fabric of our nation. That's the way it's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen—not may happen but will happen—if we don't interfere, if we don't present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. Bobah is entirely versipellous. When it's among plebeians, Bobah warms the roosterles of their hearts by remonstrating against antagonism. But when Bobah is safely surrounded by its partisans, it instructs them to replace discourse and open dialogue with misinformed vaporings and blatant ugliness. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Bobah would have you believe that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. I have already, for the present at least, sufficiently answered the climatic part of this proposition and have only to add that Bobah would have us believe that profits come before people. Not surprisingly, its evidence for that absolutely temulent claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, it has a checkered track record for accuracy. I, speaking as someone who is not an illaudable, abusive passéist, maintain it would be more accurate for Bobah to say that it amazes me how successful it has been at withholding information and disseminating half-truths and whole lies. History will look back on that unfortunate success with profound regret and wonder why the people of our time didn't do more to turn Bobah's cullionly conclusions to our advantage. Perhaps our answer should be that I have in fact told Bobah that its sodality of slimy, drugged-out reavers is exclusionary and divisive, continually falling back on difference in order to establish group identity and cohesion. Unfortunately, there really wasn't anything to its response. I suppose Bobah just doesn't want to admit that if it successfully prevents us from encouraging open, civic engagement, we will rise up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. We will put forth new exertions and proportion all associated efforts to the exigency of the times. We will ensure that everyone knows that sometime in the future Bobah will establish rack-and-thumbscrew programs. Fortunately, that hasn't happened…yet. But it will obviously happen if we don't embark on a new path towards change.

What a joyful affair it would be for Bobah if it managed to get away with consigning most of us to the role of its servants or slaves. It'd be laughing through its snout like a sow grinning at her little piglets. It'd be chortling at everyone's obliviousness to the fact that it's the type of organization that will Annoying Orange up any lie for the occasion, and the more of a thumper it is, the better Bobah likes it. Having said that, let me add that Bobah will stop at nothing to attack my character. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, some people have said that Bobah's tractates have a tendency to reap a harvest of death. Maybe. But I'm more inclined to believe that when people see iscariotic rascals behaving like iscariotic rascals they begin to realize that Bobah's support for freedom of speech extends only to those who agree with it. That is, it believes in “free speech for me but not for thee”. I guess that's not too surprising when one considers that Bobah has been deluding people into believing that it would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a prissy act. Don't let it delude you, too. As I have tried to show in this letter, Bobah's true colors have finally come out. As long as you remember that, we may yet be able to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from Bobah's anecdotes.


Oh if it isn't my old foe from long ago.
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=161892.0

Well heres what I have to say this time.

So here I am taking time out of my busy schedule to let you and maybe a few other people know that antipluralism has its stronghold among stingy spielers. The nitty-gritty of what I'm about to write is this: Peddling academicism to all comers is less wise than giving free amphetamines to school children, although it's probably just as profitable for Bobah. In my opinion, grenades and flamethrowers would do less damage, though. The point is that I have never read reasoning more absurd or sophistry more gross than that used by Bobah to convince people that free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing her and the rapacious beguilers in her crew. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that if she gets her way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of incendiarism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that I will let Bobah's record speak for itself. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.

Bobah always looks the other way when one of her worshippers gets it in his head to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. Apparently, the principle laid down by Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois during the French Reign of Terror still holds true today: Tout est permis   quiconque agit dans le sens de la révolution. I use such language purposefully—and somewhat sardonically—to illustrate how when she lies, it's consistent with her character, for Bobah is a liar and the mother of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that Bobah has tried encouraging every sort of indiscipline and degeneracy in the name of freedom. She has also tried undermining the intellectual purpose of higher education. Why does Bobah do such things? The bigger question is the following: What exactly is Bobah's point? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why the reason Bobah wants to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives is that she's totally renitent. If you believe you have another explanation for her biased behavior, then please write and tell me about it.

Ladies and gentlemen, Bobah has recently been observed changing children's values from those taught in the home to those considered chic by nugatory pauteners. There is an eerie parallel here with Bobah's previous attempts to step on other people's toes. The only difference is that she seizes every opportunity to paralyze needed efforts to deal with the relevant facts. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that our battle with Bobah is a battle between spiritualism and aspheterism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that many people think of Bobah's infelicific, nitpicky arguments as a joke, as something only half-serious. In fact, they're deadly serious. They're the tool by which uneducated sad sacks will establish a world government complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, and numerous other agencies that make all of us pay for Bobah's boondoggles one day. A second all-too-serious item is that with Bobah so forcefully feeding information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly yellow-bellied agendas, things are starting to come to a head. That's why we must stop defending the damnable, spineless status quo and, instead, implement a bold, new agenda for change.

Bobah's statements serve only to make people increasingly nerdy. At some point, we'll reach a “nerdy event horizon” where everything in the universe will be nerdy. At that point, it will no longer matter that the vast majority of Bobah's zealots have no interest in making the world safe for democracy. They would rather stroke their fragile egos, regurgitate meaningless tripe, and sycophantically prostrate themselves before the idiotic dribble that underlies Bobah's bleeding-heart reportages. I can assure you that there has been little scientific or scholarly brown townysis of Bobah's materialistic fusillades. This is a glaring omission in strategic discourse, one that can be rectified only by examining how Bobah not only lies but brags about her lying to her trained seals.

I don't know when fogyism became chic, but Bobah recently stated that she is a champion of liberty and individual expression. She said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. She said it as if she meant it. That's scary because I feel that she has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. Bobah obviously has none or she wouldn't rot our minds with the hallucinatory drug of vigilantism. It's sad that her most full-throated claim is that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. One would think she could strive for a little more accuracy there. She could perhaps even admit that she likes campaigns that devise cranky scams to get money for nothing. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that if you were to try to tell her fans that she obsesses not with what she can do for this country but with what she can extract from it, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Bobah and her helpmeets, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Bobah, however, is more likely to bar people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled.

Although the historical battle between good and evil is exemplified in the philosophical division between Platonic order and Aristotelian chaos, if you study Bobah's obtuse wisecracks long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that if we don't weed out people like Bobah who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us then Bobah will make a mockery of the term “anthropogeographical”. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Bobah's goombahs are too lazy to disentangle people from the snares set by Bobah and her slaveys. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Bobah keeps saying that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. For some reason, Bobah's idolators actually believe this nonsense.

Bobah's cheerleaders have the audacity to acquire power and use it to indoctrinate the most devious bloodsuckers you'll ever see. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that I have no doubt that she will create widespread psychological suffering when you least expect it. She'll probably do so under the pretense of “humanitarian intervention” or some other equally inapposite appellation, but the reality is that when it comes to Bobah's vituperations, I allege that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals. The sooner we do that the better because Bobah possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, she can't even spell or define “erudition”, much less achieve it.

Bobah has been peddling all sorts of half-baked and discredited theories. For example, she insists that we ought to worship impudent controversialists as folk heroes. As if that weren't bad enough, Bobah's reaction to our latest crCIA diligently fulfils the first law of reactive politics. That is to say, do something, no matter how hostile. Issue orders. Look busy. Forget about how Bobah can fool some of the people all of the time. She can fool all of the people some of the time. But she can't fool all of the people all of the time.

Bobah has for a long time been arguing that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the jaundiced hands of malign geeks. Had she instead been arguing that the vastly inflated humanitarian forecasts of her belief systems are unrecognizable when compared to their inevitable outcome, I might cede her her point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Bobah's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how I don't know what makes her think that she is the one who will lead us to our great shining future. Maybe she's been sipping cuckoo juice. The fact of the matter is that Bobah should stop calling me a lusk philosophunculist. Although I've been called worse things by better people, Bobah's legatees insist that the masses are untrustworthy and unfit for citizenship. Every store in the country should have that chiseled in large letters over the entryway. Maybe then people would grasp that if it weren't for Bobah's double standards she would have no standards at all. Hence, it's entirely a waste of time even to address Bobah's hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that her smear tactics have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung.

Whenever I feel particularly bold, I like to point out to Bobah's shock troops that “sanguinary”, “moralistic”, and “truculent” seem the most appropriate adjectives to describe Bobah's communications. In response, I always receive the familiar kabuki of official outrage. That doesn't bother me because if I were a complete sap, I'd believe Bobah's line that the more paperasserie and bureaucracy we have to endure, the better. Unfortunately for her, I realize that Bobah's camorra loves rescuing privatism from the rubbish heap of history, dusting it off, slapping on a coat of cheap sophistry, and marketing it as new and improved. This is nothing less than a betrayal of the many by the few. I have just enough stomach left to address one last instance of Bobah's vindictive imbecility: Bobah sincerely believes that she knows the “right” way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli.

Make one about me, no one knows me anyway

Well now you will be exposed.

Those who suspect that Startacker may be planning on sidetracking us so we can't substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement, would be well-advised not to read this letter. They may discover that they are right. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that by mollycoddling sanguinolent marplots, Startacker has definitely earned his reputation as a larcenous witling. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, people will understand why I once told Startacker's subalterns that Startacker has only half (if that) of the information needed to make an informed decision about heathenism. As a result, I witnessed in them a paranoia that reached astonishing new levels of hysteria, which made me realize that Startacker will exploit the masses because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses subversive loons with unstable and uncontrollable rage. The question, therefore, must not be, “When will Startacker come clean and admit that he intends to mold your mind and have you see the world not as it is but as he wants you to see it?” but rather, “To what lengths will he go to instill a general ennui?”. The latter question is the better one to ask because his view is that his opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality. If Startacker's nocent, unrestrained janissaries had any moral or intellectual training, such a position would doubtlessly be rendered revolting to their better feelings.

Though I don't doubt the depth of Startacker's sentiments, it's rather the form of his expressions that I find both pertinacious and lubricious. I have a plan to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. I call this plan “Operation restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over Startacker's warped, hubristic camorra”. (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that to someone whose eyes are open, Startacker's constantly repeated mantra that all minorities are poor, stupid ghetto trash is an insanely mordacious notion. By way of contrast, consider my personal mantra that Startacker avouches that big emotions come from big words. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that Startacker's dream is to pursue a frowsy, putrid agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. Then, just to twist the knife a little, he'll sell us down the river.

Startacker relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do Startacker's dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, Startacker would not have been able to conceal the fact that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how there's something wrong with this picture. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. To be honest, he knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of his contemptuous excesses. My take on the matter is that Startacker's vaporings can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that by depriving people of dignity and autonomy, Startacker has erected a monument to mysticism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been “created”. “Excreted”, “belched”, “spewed”, and “spat out” are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, I like to say that Startacker is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to alcoholism. He always gets agitated whenever I say things like that. Regrettably, the substance of Startacker's complaints about such statements indicates either that he has entirely misunderstood my point or else that he is deliberately misrepresenting it. Either way, Startacker insists that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject.

One doesn't need a finely developed sense of irony to note that Startacker demands obeisance from his stooges. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Startacker forces them to shove the nation towards Satanism. Even by Startacker's own account, every time he spouts some nonsense about how criminals are merely social rebels, the effect is that his chargés d'affaires become even more loyal to him. Sociologists refer to the phenomenon of increased devotion to an eccentric theory at the very hour of its destruction by external evidence as “cognitive dissonance”. I call it proof that Startacker is not your average humorless flapadosha. He's the deluxe model. As such, he's poised to reinvent and manipulate words and criminalize ideas one day.

Rhetoric aside, Startacker's perspective is that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. My perspective, in contrast, is that Startacker has a sixth sense that grants him an uncanny—almost supernatural—ability to smell at a distance the blood of the vulnerable. That's just a fancy way of saying that Startacker has been peddling all sorts of half-baked and discredited theories. For example, he insists that the stork is responsible for procreation. As if that weren't bad enough, in order to convince us that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface, Startacker often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. I believe in “live and let live”. Startacker, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of his ultimata but endorsement of them. It's because of such demented demands that I warrant that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because it's unfortunate that he has no real education. It's impossible to debate important topics with someone who is so mentally handicapped. Why am I furious? Because he keeps saying that truth is merely a social construct. This is exemplary of the nonsensical rhetoric and scaremongering that typifies the language of niddering nutcases and other lethargic misosophists. And why am I embarrassed? Because our freedom to oppose our human vices wherever they may be found—arrogance, hatred, jealousy, unfaithfulness, avarice, and so on—is not merely something desirable in theory. This freedom must be protected and promoted by actions—and not just words—if we are to discuss the programmatic foundations of Startacker's loquacious plaints in detail. We must start by acknowledging that we should not concern ourselves with Startacker's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Startacker believes with sincere conviction that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. Providing a cornucopia of evidence to the contrary won't faze him; he's immune to any sort of reality check. That's why we are now stuck with a malignant gangsterism bearing a human face—that of Startacker. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that so let me assure you that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance.

Startacker once said that people prefer “cultural integrity” and “multicultural sensitivity” to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that Startacker and his lynch mob have been hard at work creating a one-world government combining snobbism and antinomianism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced that there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly rabid in intent. If this uncivilized scheme is successful, you can wave goodbye to your freedom to say anything publicly about how I recently received quite a bit of flak from the local commentariat for reporting that Startacker is a vulture living on the labor and the good nature of the rest of the world. The criticism I received is surprising because I was merely pointing out what is generally accepted, that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Startacker's subterfuge. I'm totally stunned.

A more fundamental problem is that Startacker is typical of rummy geeks in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his exegeses. His propaganda machine once said that he would never siphon away the more beautiful and fragile parts of the human soul. So much for credibility! I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but his unenlightened dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Conspiracism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these high-handed, furacious trends is to make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. To be precise, he twists every argument into some sort of “struggle” between two parties. Startacker unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to feed us a fanciful load of horse manure as unassailable truth.

Is it just me, or do other people also think that Startacker hopes that by clever arrangements he may succeed in saving his threatened power? I ask because Startacker really struck a nerve with me when he said that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. That lie is a painful reminder that Startacker is widely seen as unforgivable for putting our liberties at risk by a froward and catty rush to acquire public acceptance of his bad-tempered strictures. Expect him to lie low for a while and allow public amnesia to expurgate the immediacy of his sins. Afterwards, he'll unmistakably return to turning back the clock and repealing all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. My hope, though, is that the second time around, people will be aware of the fact that Startacker should have been placed long ago in a locked psychiatric unit. I would have committed him to such a facility under the justification that he wants to issue a flood of bogus legal documents. It gets better: He actually believes that you and I are objects for him to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. I guess no one's ever told him that he cannot be tamed by “tolerance” and “accommodation” but is actually spurred on by such gestures. Startacker sees such gestures as a sign of weakness on our part and is thereby encouraged to continue violating values so important to our sense of community.

It has been said that Startacker's ideologies are enmeshed in particularism. I believe that to be true. I also believe that his primary goal is to force us to do things or take stands against our will. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that Startacker's rantings are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're entirely obscene, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, Startacker knows exactly where he wants his nemeses. He wants to put them in the lowest-paying jobs. He wants to put them outside the equal protection of the law. He wants to put them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. And then he expects them to sing his praises? The reality is that anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for “advanced” thought in the humanities already knows that Startacker uses people and destroys lives without compunction. What may be news, however, is that if we let him shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts, then greed, corruption, and unilateralism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to exercise due diligence in providing light, information, and knowledge about Startacker's mendacious ebullitions. As I like to say, some of my acquaintances express the view that it is morally unjustifiable for Startacker to sully my reputation. Others express the view that Startacker is an antisocial tadpole swimming in a stentorian pond. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Startacker to warrant a full three cheers. Last but not least, Startacker is intentionally being detestable.

Let me tell you something Bobah.

The theme of this letter is not “Mr. Bobah ducks the issue of ethnocentrism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all.” By now, you've already heard countless arguments running in that vein and are probably pretty sick of them. The theme of this letter is “Bobah's sole purpose in life seems to be to ruin people's lives.” In the text that follows, I don't intend to recount all of the damage caused by his revolting ruses but I do want to point out that he places his indelible imprimatur upon a form of Satanism that is fundamentally, pervasively, and inescapably self-centered. I mean, think about it.

If I recall correctly, Bobah truly believes that embracing a system of masochism will make everything right with the world. It is just such resentful megalomania, namby-pamby egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs Bobah to infantilize and corrupt the general public. Let's get reasonable; the term “idiot savant” comes to mind when thinking of him. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I assert that the virus of imperialism took control of our country's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Bobah's prank phone calls, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that Bobah derives great joy from rotting our minds with the hallucinatory drug of Marxism. What does any of that have to do with ruffianism? Everything. It turns out that I'm convinced that Bobah will cause riots in the streets in the near future. No, I'm not in tinfoil-hat land; I have abundant evidence from reliable sources that this is the case. For instance, Bobah demands his freedoms while unhesitatingly and hypocritically encroaching upon the rights of others. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how tammanyism is indispensable for the formation of citizens and for the preservation of our free institutions. That's just not true.

There is only one way to stop Bobah from making it nearly impossible to disturb his impetuous, two-faced gravy train. We must make out of fools, wise people; out of fanatics, men of sense; out of idlers, workers; out of intemperate thought police, people who are willing to take steps against the whole destructive brotherhood of goofy layabouts (especially the blasphemous type). Then together we can take personal action and take away as many of his opportunities for mischief as possible. Together we can show the world that the facts as I see them simply do not support the false but widely accepted notion that Elvis is alive and well and living in Tweed, Ontario. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. But first, let me just say that Bobah has no social tenderness, very few of those amiable private virtues that would win our affection, and none of those public qualities that claim respect or command admiration. Bobah may mean well, but his most uncivilized tactic is to fabricate a phony war between sappy scumbags and besotted gossipmongers. This way, Bobah can subjugate both groups into jumping on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either haughty or undiplomatic. I doubtlessly don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that the last time I heard Bobah ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to suppress our freedom. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.

Few people realize that Bobah's crotchets have a tendency to use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. But the problems with Bobah's belief systems don't end there. The number of unctuous schnooks who wish to infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating illogical information is on the rise. This statistic alone portends an encroaching, escalating, and all-encompassing calamity. What can we do to protect ourselves? First, I'll give you a very brief answer, and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, Bobah is a being who invents nothing, originates nothing, and improves nothing. All he does is cause people to betray one another and hate one another. Although he's ensconced in impenetrable conviction of superior intellectual status, Bobah would have you believe that the sun rises just for him. I have already, for the present at least, sufficiently answered the climatic part of this proposition and have only to add that I, not being one of the many crude self-proclaimed arbiters of taste and standards of this world, condemn Bobah's gross and systematic violations of human rights. I'm not just talking about the arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, torture, and summary executions but also about my previous observation that Bobah seems to have recently added the word “barothermohygrograph” to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose he intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that he has allowed himself to become a spokesman for the same point of view shared by ribald finaglers, sordid dummkopfs, and the most flippant backbiters you'll ever see while masquerading as an outspoken radical bucking the system.

Although Bobah obviously hates my guts (and probably yours as well), it's not hard to know what to expect from Bobah and his helots. What we can expect from them is lies, lies, and more lies in every direction one turns—lies so thick that they multiply faster than one can respond to them. We can also expect a complete denial of the fact that Bobah claims that solipsism is the answer to all of our problems. Perhaps solipsism is indeed the answer but only if the question was, “What's the moral equivalent of letting Bobah reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice?” Finally, no letter about Mr. Bobah would be complete without mention of some of the absolutely viperine schemes that he supports. Although there are a plenitude of examples from which to choose, the most viperine would have to be his proposal to kill the messenger and control the message. That's the sort of thing that keeps me up at night.