Author Topic: Complaint against Badspot  (Read 13464 times)


Ok this is getting out of control.

waiting on the big D(ooble) to bust in here and slay some fools with so real men's paragraphs

this is the great wall of the blockland forums jesus forget

Zet, it's you again. I'm not done with you!
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=161892.0


This is a letter I have planned on writing for some time, a letter that I think is extremely important and one that obviously must be heeded if we are to undo the damage caused by Zet. Just so you know, I plan to spend a good deal of this letter discussing Zet and his garrulous homilies. I also plan to say a bit about how there are numerous defects, physical, mental, and moral, that clearly mark Zet as a hypocritical, high-handed nincompoop, but I'll save that part for the end. His mottos are like the Hydra from Greek mythology. They continually acquire new heads and new strength. The only way to stunt their growth is to raise several issues about Zet's litigious perceptions that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. The only way to destroy Zet's Hydra entirely is to provide more people with the knowledge that when you tell Zet's groupies that Zet has studiously avoided being contaminated by the facts, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that one of his favorite dirty tricks is to forge letters from his adversaries. These forgeries are laced with scandalous “revelations” about everyone Zet hates. Such trickery deflects attention from the fact that Zet's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth but only destructive answers, addlepated resolutions to conflicts.

Many people who follow Zet's accusations have come to the erroneous conclusion that the average working-class person can't see through Zet's chicanery. The stark truth of the matter is that his support for freedom of speech extends only to those who agree with him. That is, Zet believes in “free speech for me but not for thee”. I guess that's not too surprising when one considers that Zet commemorates Adversarialism Awareness Week, as if that were a legitimate holiday. And for those immature mooncalves who want to hide behind the argument that Zet's assistants are not unsavory battologists but rather deceitful babblers, my question is simply this: What's the difference?

The following theorem may therefore be established as an eternally valid truth: Whenever Zet is blamed for conspiring to challenge all I stand for, he blames his slaves. Doing so reinforces their passivity and obedience and increases their guilt, shame, terror, and conformity, thereby making them far more willing to help Zet spread ruin widely through the land. He plans to skewer me over a pit barbecue. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Zet encourages mockery towards differing viewpoints. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding his promotion of pessimism. Tell everyone you know that what I have been writing up to this point is not what I initially intended to write in this letter. Instead, I decided it would be far more productive to tell you that I admit that I'm not perfect. I admit that I may have been a bit harebrained when I stated that Zet's monographs are a ticking time bomb, set to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. Still, that doesn't justify the name-calling, rudeness, and simple ugliness that Zet invariably finds so necessary. Nor does it justify his turning once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard.

With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, a highly regarded professor at a nearby university determined that concrete examples abound of ways to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in Zet's reinterpretations of historic events. For instance, consider that Zet doesn't want us to know about his plans to make our lives miserable. Otherwise, we might do something about that. He has recently been going around claiming that the purpose of education is not to produce independent thinkers but submissive state subjects. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.

I could accuse Zet of using rummy traitors to get his way but I wouldn't stoop to that level. None of his ideas are the least bit original. He simply stole, rehashed, and re-branded perennial knowledge as his own in an attempt to convince the public that the stork is responsible for procreation. Granted, there may be some originality in being so slatternly, but the point remains that when Zet says that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

If my own experience has taught me anything, it's that we can divide Zet's sottises into three categories: illiberal, foul-mouthed, and tendentious. I sometimes see well-meaning people swallow Zet's lie that profits come before people. To my mind, shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. That's why I wish that all decent people realized that Zet has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but Zet probably regrets stating publicly that he holds a universal license that allows him to make me the target of a constant, consistent, systematic, sustained campaign of attacks. Although we can attribute that vile comment to a bout of foot-in-mouth disease, if Zet were allowed to confiscate other people's rightful earnings, that could spell the wholesale destruction of countless lives. The only rational response to this looming threat is for all of us to condemn Zet's criminal ineptitude. To be more specific, bellicose saps serve as the priests in his cult of dirty elitism. These “priests” spend their days basking in Zet's reflected glory, pausing only when Zet instructs them to make all of us pay for his boondoggles. What could be more costive? Many people consider that question irrelevant on the grounds that I despise everything about Zet. I despise Zet's attempts to impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. I despise how he insists that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about him. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents and in these primarily as an illustration that Zet has especially been targeting schools and universities, trying to convert them into indoctrination centers for egoism. Once such institutions of learning can be coerced into suppressing freedom of expression, free inquiry, independent research, and all objectivity, they will become training grounds for truculent bludgers who are dedicated to serving Zet and carrying out his plan of converting our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle.

The earth presents a wonderful example of variety in all classes of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. People, beasts, and plants belonging to distinct classes all exhibit special qualities and peculiarities. Unfortunately, Zet's special quality is that he avers that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. This is a fixed and false (i.e., delusional) belief that will lead to his fragmenting the nation into politically disharmonious units before long. I don't know if we can cure Zet of this fastuous belief, but I do know that his blandishments cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that Zet is a moral exemplar.

I challenge all of the cuckoo vandals out there to consider this: Zet's eulogists have tried repeatedly to assure me that Zet will eventually tire of his plan to lead a poxy jihad against those who oppose him and will then step aside and let us build a new understanding that can transport us to tomorrow. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between “don't hold your breath” and “beware of flying pigs”. Whenever I hear his cronies witter on about how we should avoid personal responsibility, I interpret this poppyrooster as an implicit request for chemical treatment of their rampant (and generally unacknowledged) Asperger syndrome. Zet just keeps on saying, “I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to jawbone aimlessly.” It may sound strange to him when I say that given the very real threat of him slowing scientific progress it is essential that we justify condemnation, constructive criticism, and ridicule of him and his confused hariolations, but Zet has said that he has suffered so much that whatever offenses he commits are legitimate attempts to recapture dignity, obtain justice, or exact revenge. Furthermore, the language Zet used to say that demonstrates plagiarism and maybe the onset of early senility. While his semi-literate ramblings might be of some interest to specialists in child communication, Zet has been misdirecting, discrediting, disrupting, and otherwise neutralizing his opponents. This outrageous conduct indicates to me that you should never forget the three most important facets of his campaigns of malice and malignity, namely their pea-brained origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature.

On a more personal note, Zet believes that the majority of biggety hedonists work 25 hours a day, eight days a week and thus deserve occasionally to promote a politics of defeat and demoralization, of pessimism and selfishness. Unfortunately, as long as he believes such absurdities, he will continue to commit atrocities. Stalinism is a plague upon us all, a pox that will likely not be erased in the lifetime of any reader of this letter. To Zet, however, it's merely a convenient mechanism for stepping on other people's toes.

Again, some of my acquaintances express the view that Zet exhibits a reckless disregard for the safety of others. Others express the view that Zet's imprecations are but a speck in a constellation of methodologies used by cameralism to break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Zet to warrant a full three cheers. When I was growing up, we were taught that one should always try to provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. Nowadays, it seems that more and more kids are being taught that illaudable mendicants are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. You can thank Zet for this shambolic pedagogical viewpoint, especially given that he is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because Zet's previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that his new changes will be even more acerbic because Zet wants to control every aspect of our lives. He wants us to rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of a drum. Then, once we're molded into a uniform mass, we'll be incapable of seeing that Zet fails to see anything wrong with exploiting public sympathy in order to bolster support for his crime-stained casus belli. This bespeaks an investment of complex psychic import. That's why it helps to remember that if I recall correctly, Zet's cohorts claim to have no choice but to dominate or intimidate others. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, myopic backbiters. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. All of this once again proves the old saying that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, am not suggesting government censorship of Zet's nocent zingers.

While Pie Crust needs no introduction, I do want to state that Pie is every bit as infernal as biased roosteralorums. Before I begin talking about specifics, let me just mention that I have nothing more to say on that issue. Need I say more? I don't think so, but this I will say: Pie must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could he manage to tell us that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion? He keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. The purpose of this deception may be to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. Or maybe the purpose is to make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. Oh what a tangled web Pie weaves when first he practices to deceive.

Pie says that all scientific and technological progress would come to a halt were it not for his modes of thought. That's like a rooster taking credit for the sunrise. I mean, it's not like Pie doesn't know that to him, the fact that his drugged-out reportages have yielded little in the way of positive results—and that they doubtlessly have dangerous long-term consequences—is not a reason to stop and reassess. Rather, it's a call to action; it's an opportunity for Pie to pursue a twofold credo of philistinism and mysticism. His groupies spread serfism all over the globe like pigeon droppings over Trafalgar Square simply because they think it's fun. Now take that to the next level: Deception, flattering, lying, deluding, talking behind the back, putting up a false front, living in borrowed splendor, wearing a mask, hiding behind convention, playing a role for others and for oneself—in short, a continuous fluttering around the solitary flame of vanity—is so much the rule and the law among his biggety spin doctors that I can draw but one conclusion. As you can probably guess, my conclusion is that if Pie can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Twisted Rhetoric. In the meantime, I've tried to explain to Pie's obtuse protégés that it is difficult to overstate Pie's hatred, bigotry, and devotion to caciquism. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that someone has to be willing to establish a “truth commission” whose charter is to investigate some of Pie's more dastardly annunciations. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction.

Cullionly rantipoles have increasingly been lobotomizing everyone caught thinking an independent thought. Pie has a lot to answer for in regard to that. He has been surprisingly successful at convincing furacious antagonists that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. It's shameful that so many people have bought into this nonsense. It's even more shameful that Pie claims that “the truth”, “the whole truth”, and “nothing but the truth” are three different things. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.

By slowing scientific progress, Pie is playing Russian roulette with our future. (Yes, my message has always been that the whole issue of radicalism is far more complex than Pie wants to admit, but that's a different story.) As I noted at the beginning of this letter, he says he's obligated to take us over the edge of the abyss of Titoism. Sure, Pie may lack the vision and courage to exercise all of our basic rights to the maximum, but let's not allow him off the hook by pretending that he doesn't have a choice in the matter. As our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the sorts of people Pie preys upon. One can examine this from another angle and plainly see that he can't be trusted. Everything Pie says is a lie, and everything Pie does is based on a lie: his invectives, his capilotades, his hariolations—all lies, lies with flakes of truth sprinkled about to make filthy research stars believe them.

I am familiar with Pie's goals; I understand how he operates; I have long recognized his tactics; and I know just about where Pie now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, unmistakably, he will stop at nothing to sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. But the problems with Pie's editorials don't end there. His programs of Gleichschaltung may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into iscariotic, intellectually challenged fainéantism. As a final, parting thought, I assert that we must give Pie Crust the severe tongue-lashing he deserves. This is a long road and not one for the fainthearted, but if pursued with integrity and conviction it could lead to a world in which people are no longer afraid to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let Pie cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination.


I think my report is somewhat valid again.

Edit: i dont feel like being part of the chainban
« Last Edit: May 18, 2015, 11:22:16 PM by Malleo100 »


Bobah, It really has been 4 long years my old friend!

I have a burning desire to vent my spleen on Bobah. As you read this letter, bear in mind that there are many points of general dissatisfaction and dispute that should not, on any account, be overlooked in the discussion of the subjects here presented. One of these is that our duty should be to challenge Bobah's outlandish premises and dubious motives. To needle and wheedle the worst sorts of chippy ne'er-do-wells there are into her sodality of uncontrollable mooks is alien to this duty. That's why I want you to know that Bobah says that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life.

Bobah is good at one thing, and that's keeping her ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of her retinue know that Bobah is planning to encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. Even fewer of these initiates know that some of Bobah's arguments are so convoluted that they require a dictionary, a decoder ring, and a team of scholars to decipher. Bobah may mean well, but she should have been placed long ago in a locked psychiatric unit. I would have committed Bobah to such a facility under the justification that she has been giving people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions. It's time to even the score. I suggest that we begin by notifying people of the fact that Bobah makes it sound like honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, what Bobah is doing falls just short of giving handguns to schoolchildren. But there's the rub; Bobah regards the notions of truth and objectivity as antiquated and as obstacles to social change. It may be more correct, however, to say that if you're interested in the finagling, double-dealing, chicanery, cheating, cajolery, cunning, rascality, and abject villainy by which she may convince impressionable young people that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them in a lustrum or two, then you'll want to consider the following very carefully. You'll especially want to consider that Bobah is not your average cuckoo opportunist. She's the deluxe model. As such, she's decidedly poised to impose tremendous hardships on tens of thousands of decent, hard-working individuals eventually.

We have to set an example. If we do, others will follow, and soon everyone will be speaking out against behavior and speech that is intended to sharpen intergroup tensions. This is an encouraging prospect, especially given that I'm not saying it'll be easy to straighten out our thinking and change the path we're on. In fact, it might turn out to be quite painful to do something like that. However, facing temporary pain is better than suffering from a permanent ailment, and that's why you need to hear that we must free people from the bondage of feudalism. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. At this point, our task is to challenge Bobah's brusque assumptions about merit. Your support can help greatly with this task, this crucial task, at which we must not fail.

is this the loving guy with the dirt folder
is this what he has been building up this entire time oh my god

Zet, it's you again. I'm not done with you!
http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=161892.0
holy stuff you've been out for revenge for FOUR YEARS and now youve finally got it. How do you feel sir.


« Last Edit: May 19, 2015, 05:22:27 PM by Bobah »