Author Topic: Complaint against Badspot (Read 13571 times)

Hawt · May 20, 2015, 10:32:35 AM

Do you recall a time before Kalphiter got interested in substituting “I-it” relationships for “I-thou” relationships? If so, then you must be a lot older than I because that's pretty much all Kalphiter wants to do nowadays. There are a number of reasons Kalphiter isn't telling us as to why he wants to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that he has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that his campaigns of terror have gotten way out of hand. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why Kalphiter has vowed that any day now he'll create a system of Mohockism characterized by confidential files, closed courts, gag orders, and statutory immunity. This is hardly news; Kalphiter has been vowing that for months with the regularity of a metronome. What is news is that there is indubitably a nefarious dimension to his apologues. Or, if “nefarious” is too narrow of a term, perhaps you'd prefer “malevolent”. In any case, it may seem difficult at first to comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to promote Kalphiter's beer-guzzling substitute for morality, which defines as hypersensitive any attempt to keep the faith. It is. But Kalphiter has already begun introducing absurd, baseless, terror-ridden lawsuits intended to destroy the lives of countless innocent people. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, I, not being one of the many duplicitous mooks of this world, want to urge lawmakers to pass a nonbinding resolution affirming that there is no honor in Kalphiter's prophecies. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé but because the baneful nature of Kalphiter's casus belli is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.

Kalphiter and his flunkies are, by nature, intellectually challenged wimps. Not only can that nature not be changed by window-dressing or persiflage, but if Kalphiter can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. Can you believe that he actually stated that anyone who disagrees with him is a potential terrorist? I, for one, was stunned until I remembered that Kalphiter's secret passion is to “solve” all our problems by talking them to death. For shame!

Kalphiter sometimes has trouble convincing people that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few bloodthirsty yobbos to constate authoritatively that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which incorrigible, snarky scamsters like Kalphiter are thoroughly absent. The other road leads into the darkness of fanaticism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? The answer to this question gives the key not only to world history but to all human culture. I've heard him say that our freedoms should survive on the crumbs that fall from the banquet table of antagonism. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Kalphiter secretly trying to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community? No, don't guess; this isn't audience participation day. I'll just tell you. But before I do, you should note that he has offered to deter his groupies from diluting the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Did he follow through with that? No, of course not. This failure may be Kalphiter's most consequential broken promise. It suggests that perhaps the worst classes of unsympathetic, cuckoo vandals there are are somehow fascinated by Kalphiter's philopolemical diablerie, just as a dove is sometimes charmed by a glittering serpent. Unfortunately for such people, Kalphiter ought to realize that the most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. Unfortunately, he tends to utter so much verbiage about corporatism that I can conclude only that we need to ensure that Kalphiter receives his just deserts. Unfortunately, reaching that simple conclusion sometimes seems to be above human reason. But there is a wisdom above human, and to that we must look if we are ever to challenge the present and enrich the future.

Have you ever stopped to consider the enormous havoc and ruin that has been wrought in this world by Kalphiter and his yeomen? I have. That's why I say that in a recent tell-all, a former member of his peuplade writes that “desperate times call for desperate measures”. Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that you don't have to say anything specifically about Kalphiter for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should deliver new information about his uncompromising spittle-flecked rants. How dare he criticize my values when his are so obviously stroppy? What I want to document now is that Kalphiter is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way.

I have to wonder where Kalphiter got the idea that it is my view that one hallmark of an advanced culture is the rejection of rationalism. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true, and I've never written anything to imply that it is. As we don our battle fatigues, let's at least be clear about what we're fighting for: Our war is not about reducing the deficit, not about ending welfare for the rich, and not about the largesse or responsibility of private philanthropy. All we want is for his chums not to build a totalitarian death machine. He commemorates Snobbism Awareness Week, as if that were a legitimate holiday. Griping about Kalphiter will not make him stop trying to fight with spiritual weapons that are as stentorian as they are scrofulous. But even if it did, he would just find some other way to prime the pump of denominationalism.

Kalphiter wants nothing less than to rot out the foundations of our religious, moral, and political values. His bootlickers then wonder, “What's wrong with that?” Well, there's not much to be done with foul thought police who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with exploitative hoddypeaks on a regular basis at work or in school. We therefore may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to place malapert riffraff at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy. While it is essential—and among my highest priorities—to punish him for his imperious teachings, he is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because Kalphiter's previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that his new changes will be even more impolitic because my goal is to get Kalphiter to realize that his inficete, impractical homilies lie at the intersection of extremism, blackguardism, and racialism—the standard troika of shiftless thought. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed doofus, that's his prerogative.

As far as Kalphiter is concerned, facts and evidence are subordinate to, and mediated by, a “discourse”. There are no right or wrong answers, just competitive discourses. If that's the case, then perhaps Kalphiter would like to explain why he disbelieves that you shouldn't let him intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Kalphiter.

I don't know what to do about the rise in zabernism I see all around me. Kalphiter's solution. not surprisingly, is to annihilate a person's personality, individuality, will, and character. This is one case in which the cure is clearly worse than the disease. Ancient Greek dramatists discerned a peculiar virtue in being tragic. Kalphiter would do well to realize that they never discerned any virtue in being testy.

Whenever I confront Kalphiter about his salacious jeers, he either tells me that I don't understand him or feeds me some meaningless mumbo-jumbo about fascism. Although others may disagree with that claim, few would dispute that in all the torrents of rhetorical hot air thus far expended, it's hard to find a single sentence from him that acknowledges that we must resist his deliberate, overt attempts to distract attention from more important issues. Be patient; I won't ask you to take that on faith. Rather, I'll provide irrefragable proof that groupthink and mob behavior are common within Kalphiter's imperium. Hence, it isn't unusual for one who commits heresy against Kalphiter's established dogma to be exiled from the community. The sad part is that these outcasts still refuse to believe that Kalphiter's attempts to oppress, segregate, and punish others are much worse than mere privatism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation.

Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that Kalphiter's sycophants have been trained, organized, and motivated to fund a vast web of vicious, crass psychics, myopic monomaniacs, and bumptious airheads? I ask because the devastation caused by his mstar fishcripts is entropic, but it does not have to be inevitable. That is, if we are vigilant in effecting concrete change in the functioning of our laws and institutions we will be able to sway people towards the realization that the concept of risk includes the relationship between the consequences and probability of an event. If the consequences of an event are extremely negative, such as the devastation resulting from Kalphiter expanding, augmenting, and intensifying the size and intrusiveness of his coven, then you want the probability of the event occurring to be vanishingly small, as close to zero as possible. Unfortunately, the likelihood of Kalphiter grasping at straws, trying to find increasingly counterproductive ways to use terms of opprobrium such as “scummy, morally repugnant draffsacks” and “puzzleheaded putterers” to castigate whomever he opposes is so high that one can't help but conclude that he is absolutely determined to believe that he is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of namby-pamby nose-in-the-air snobs, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Kalphiter thinks we want him to lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. Excuse me, but maybe I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with him. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I navigate a safe path between the Scylla of Kalphiter's savage bunco games and the Charybdis of revisionism. My goal for this letter was to rail against the pseudoscience that attempts—and continually fails—to prove that Kalphiter's simply misunderstood and is actually interested only in peace. Know that I have done my best while trying always to show some backbone. Let an honest history judge.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

randomtroll39 · May 20, 2015, 11:07:52 AM

This letter may be a bit overwhelming for those people who are still soundly asleep in a world of make-believe and television and who don't want to hear how Adam Sandler richard Factory has a vested interest in making me react, on cue, to the trigger words that it has inserted into my mind by dint of endless repetition. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Adam Sandler richard Factory, not because I harbor any ill-will towards it but because it looks down upon the rest of us. From Adam Sandler richard Factory's perspective, we are blind so it must tell us what to see; we are deaf so it must tell us what to hear; and we are mute so it must tell us what to say. Such views may fool costive, undiplomatic hectors, but I avouch that Adam Sandler richard Factory believes it would be best for all of us if it were to perpetuate inaccurate and dangerous beliefs about male-female relationships. Such sentiments have no place in our community, let alone in our world. I wish that all of the flighty clueless-types who hold similar views would stop to think about how I've heard numerous complaints about Adam Sandler richard Factory's behavior. Many people I've talked to have complained that Adam Sandler richard Factory comports itself like a filthy pig, heedless of all needs but its own. Among these needs the paramount one seems to be the need to rot our minds with the hallucinatory drug of insurrectionism. This backs up my point that it is the type of organization that turns up its nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter such as why it would be good for Adam Sandler richard Factory to make all of us pay for its boondoggles.

I don't believe that power corrupts Adam Sandler richard Factory but that Adam Sandler richard Factory corrupts power. Speaking of corruption and power, Adam Sandler richard Factory sometimes has trouble convincing people that it possesses infinite wisdom. When it has such trouble, it usually trots out a few pigheaded, insensitive gits to constate authoritatively that society is supposed to be lenient towards sticky-fingered, Pecksniffian scoundrels. Whether or not that trick of its works, it's still the case that the biggest difference between me and Adam Sandler richard Factory is that Adam Sandler richard Factory wants to bring about a wonderland of tribalism. I, on the other hand, want to shatter the illusion that wars end only when a goodhearted, newly enlightened tyrant heeds the advice of transnational peace activists. I've said this before, and I'll say it again, but Adam Sandler richard Factory has been trying to conceal its plans to break us up into a set of quarreling, wrangling, squabbling factions. Fortunately, the truth about its catty objectives is spreading like a jungle fire. Soon, everyone will know that Adam Sandler richard Factory's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of ravings. Others are in the form of paroxysms. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

Adam Sandler richard Factory is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its rejoinders. I once told Adam Sandler richard Factory that this was true long before the latest scandal broke. How did it respond to that? It proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that some of my acquaintances express the view that news about Adam Sandler richard Factory's plans to galvanize the haughty herd into enthusiastically supporting its jaundiced, profligate projects occasionally puffs up like auguries of a new Pope through the Vatican chimney. Others express the view that Adam Sandler richard Factory's camorra is a zoo of exclusivism, and Adam Sandler richard Factory refuses to keep the animals leashed. I am prepared to offer a cheer and a half for each view; together, they paint a sufficiently complete picture of Adam Sandler richard Factory to warrant a full three cheers. Considering that much can be learned about Adam Sandler richard Factory by understanding insensate parochialism, I find it almost laughable how it remains oblivious to the fact that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must acknowledge and respect the essential humanity of all of Earth's people. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that we must show Adam Sandler richard Factory that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show it that we can lead it to resipiscence. Maybe then Adam Sandler richard Factory will realize that I don't need to tell you that it apparently can't tell the difference between flirting and loveual harassment, between white lies and perjury, or between a schoolboy carrying a butter knife and carrying a switchblade. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that it just keeps on saying, “We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. We just want to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization.” I have just enough stomach left to address one last instance of Adam Sandler richard Factory's vindictive imbecility: Adam Sandler richard Factory sincerely believes that its ignorance is just as good as our knowledge.

SBG · May 20, 2015, 02:26:07 PM

mine's the biggest of em all:

t

Ocelotus · May 20, 2015, 02:29:14 PM

SBG, you little stuff. I have quite a bit to complain about.

I last commented on SBG's squalid, insolent principles just a few weeks ago, but I now have reason to revisit this topic. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. Why has SBG so actively been creating anomie? Perhaps it's because he has a problem not only with civil rights but also with the legal responsibility and accountability as to what is considered appropriate behavior. Another possibility, which doesn't necessarily exclude any others, is that SBG has a vested interest in maintaining the myths that keep his imperium loyal to him. His principal myth is that big emotions come from big words. The truth is that when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, SBG is drunk with power, which is why we must make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence.

The practical struggle which now begins, sketched in broad outlines, takes the following course: I definitely hope you're not being misled by the “new SBG”. Only his methods and tactics have changed. SBG's goal is still the same: to befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. That's why I'm telling you that SBG's reports are mired in impractical revisionism. For that reason, he uses big words like “internationalization” to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although SBG's expedients may reek like a skunk, SBG has repeatedly threatened to alter, amend, abridge, and censor the record to point the finger of responsibility at others. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because it's in SBG's blood to parlay personal and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire. Given that we cannot absolutely nullify the prodigality of nature, try as hard as we may, I'm afraid I have to conclude that I've observed at least one of SBG's worshippers creating a new cottage industry around SBG's hubristic form of racialism. This is thoroughly indicative of the unprofessional, ungracious, and unacceptable behavior that is so endemic to SBG's polity.

Are you still with me? SBG claims that his homilies provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. That claim is preposterous and, to use SBG's own language, overtly homicidal. No history can justify it.

Who could have guessed that SBG would arrest and detain his foes indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel? To put it another way, why can't we all just get along? Well, I'm sure SBG would rather manipulate public understanding of Mohockism than answer that particular question. He speaks like a true defender of the status quo—a status quo, we should not forget, that enables him to glorify the things that everyone else execrates. He says that everything will be hunky-dory if we let him increase subservience to his monolithic engine of vigilantism. You know, he can lie as much as he wants, but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd indubitably prevent anyone from hearing that he once tried to convince a bunch of us that he is a paragon of morality and wisdom. Fortunately, calmer heads prevailed, and a number of people informed the rest of the gang that before SBG initiated an exclusivism flap to help promote his naive commentaries, people everywhere were expected to bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows logically that SBG has the nerve to call those of us who ensure that the values for which we have labored and for which many of us have fought and sacrificed will continue in ascendancy “conspiracy theorists”. No, we're “conspiracy revealers” because we reveal that SBG adamantly maintains that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of faddism. Such beliefs would be entirely factual if it weren't for reality. As it stands, some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that SBG is secretly scheming to gain a respectable foothold for his rambunctious perceptions. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that his offensive, mumpish pleas pervert the course of justice. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to exercise due diligence in sounding the bugle of liberty.

Given SBG's current mind-set, if one believes statements like, "Women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras—one is, in effect, supporting haughty sluggards. Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, SBG claims to have data supporting his assertion that he knows 100% of everything 100% of the time. Naturally, he insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's hiding the fact that he hates you—yes, you, because you, like me, want to snap his attendants out of their trance.

Anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to spread awareness of the whiney nature of SBG's diegeses should realize that I know more about exclusionism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that encouraging mean-spirited agitators to see themselves as victims and, therefore, live by alibis rather than by honest effort would bring unprecedented devastation and loss of life. No political, economic, or military objective could justify this outcome. But that doesn't stop SBG from promoting a form of government in which religious freedom, racial equality, and individual liberty are severely at risk or from suppressing all evidence that when he tells us that he is clean and bright and pure inside, he somehow fails to mention that his cabal is filled with weak-willed, manipulable trolls who believe his story that clueless opportunists should be given absolute authority to encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a wicked lifestyle. He fails to mention that pretending to be a victim is his parviscient attempt to envelop us in a nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror. And he fails to mention that if he gets his way, I might very well go crazy.

I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that SBG's blithe disregard for the victims of his childish, besotted gibes is what first made me realize that SBG can back up his fulminations only with empty, inflammatory rhetoric, the very thing that he vacuously accuses his competitors of using. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that it remains to be seen whether SBG's association of batty coofs is capable of self-critique. Will its members acknowledge their own insularity and excesses, or will they continue down the path of smug self-congratulation and vanity, never passing up an opportunity to seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging SBG's beliefs? In either case, SBG has been trying for some time to sell the public on an antiheroism-based government. His sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: Truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. The emotional argument: He is a spokesman for God. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that the point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to fight philistinism in all its abusive forms, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that SBG keeps insisting that exhibitionism is the key to world peace. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that many members of SBG's faction believe that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Even worse, almost all of SBG's companions believe that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. (One would think that the mammalian brain could do better than that, but apparently not.) My point is that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but SBG's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that I can easily see him performing the following lawless acts. First, SBG will bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives. Then, he will make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. I do not profess to know how likely is the eventuality I have outlined, but it is a distinct possibility to be kept in mind.

The objection may still be raised that SBG can teach students the “right” way of thinking by giving them facts that are skewed in one direction and get away with it. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: He claims that everything I say is both improvident and venom-spouting. Seldom do I pause to answer such criticism of my work and ideas. If I did, I would find little time for anything other than such correspondence in the course of the day, and I would have absolutely no time for constructive work. Hence, I intend to condense my response into the following remark: If SBG believes that he holds a universal license that allows him to bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive, then it's obvious why he avows that his drugged-out desperadoism society is a benign and charitable agency.

Stick your nose into anything SBG has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of cantankerous colonialism. In my long career, I've seen some pretty uppity things. I must admit, however, that SBG's putrid epigrams out-stink them all. Not only that, but if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that SBG holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink. We need to rally the troops to develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to cross-examine his negligent credos. Note that any such campaign involves four basic steps: negotiation, self-purification, direct action, and collection of the facts to determine whether SBG professes that he is perched atop the moral high ground. If so, then maybe he should climb down to scavenge for some facts before claiming that he has answers to everything.

SBG would have us believe that the rockets our enemies want to launch at us are filled with gumdrops and happiness. To be honest, he has never actually said that explicitly, but if you follow his logic—what little there is—you'll see that this is his real point. If he gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of hedonism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that SBG and his tuft-hunters are a bunch of hermits. As you know, hermits are wonks; wonks are sybarites; sybarites are wrongdoers; and wrongdoers all want to convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. The point is that SBG's comrades claim that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. I say to them, “Prove it”—not that they'll be able to, of course, but because an insidious form of conformism has taken root in our society. This form of conformism is distinguished by its complete denial of the fact that SBG is an inspiration to inficete oniomaniacs everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to herd us through a tunnel of special interestism, and, more importantly, they don't realize that SBG avouches that teachers should teach our children that SBG is beyond reproach. Interestingly, rather than use the word “teach” SBG substitutes the phrase, “apply strategies for facilitating learning in instructional situations.” I assume this is to conceal the fact that he has found a way to avoid compliance with government regulations, circumvent any further litigation, and squander irreplaceable treasures—all by Annoying Orangeing up a phony emergency. Let me end this letter by challenging my readers to review the basic issues at the root of the debate. Are you with me, or with the forces of tammanyism and oppression?

dargereldren · May 20, 2015, 02:47:39 PM

Quote from: SBG on May 20, 2015, 02:26:07 PM

mine's the biggest of em all:

t

Dunstabzugshaube would love that complaint.

Quote

Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how fatuitous Dunstabzugshaube is? How about here: Dunstabzugshaube shows a curious unwillingness to reinforce what is best in people. Instead of focusing on why he is not interested in a true and honest improvement of social conditions but rather in a way to delude and often rob those rendered vulnerable and susceptible to his snares because of poverty, illness, or ignorance, I would like to remind people that he has played a key role in the labefaction of our society. But that's not all: I experience bestial horror whenever I ponder the rising tide of acrasial, confused peculators. this notion is vulnerable to cynicism but can also act as the lynchpin to great acts of solidarity. It has the potential to encourage people to treat the blows of circumstance. It can convince even the most stolid fabricators there are that if you were to tell Dunstabzugshaube that we have to consider all of our options, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world.

to put it another way, there exists a concerted, well-funded, and aggressive anti-science campaign whose charter is to reduce human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Dunstabzugshaube supports this beer-guzzling campaign's activities by hoodooing us. this conviction of mine is as firm as a rock. that's clear. But we mustn't let him humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to declare a truce with him and commence a dialogue. that would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.

Fortunately, the groundswell of quiet opposition to Dunstabzugshaube is getting less quiet and more organized. Still, Dunstabzugshaube's cajoleries have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together—life! Here, too, we can see how he assumes that he's morally obligated to foster corruption and repression. the flip side of that assumption is that he sees himself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve). When a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Dunstabzugshaube is drunk with power, which is why we must call people to their highest and best, not accommodate them at their lowest and least.

You might be wondering, “Why have so many foolhardy sectarians gone into paroxysms of glee over Dunstabzugshaube's statement that views not informed by radical critique implicitly promote hegemonic values?” You might also be wondering, “How much is the axis of evil paying him to devastate vast acres of precious farmland?” Dunstabzugshaube's standard answer to this line of questioning is to babble something about how undiscoverable, unmeasurable, magical forces from another plane of existence have given him superhuman wisdom. this is usually followed by a litany of talking points in which Dunstabzugshaube attempts to distract the questioner from noticing that if his lubricious long-term goals became more widespread, it would spell the ruination of this country. He has been peddling all sorts of half-baked and discredited theories. For example, Dunstabzugshaube insists that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. As if that weren't bad enough, Dunstabzugshaube is a splenetic, malefic roisterer. Consequently, attempting to respond to his objectives with logic is futile. A more productive response is to observe that the key to guarding against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by Dunstabzugshaube and his brotherhood of dirty zobs lies in uniting civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, and rights of conscience.

If I thought that Dunstabzugshaube's op-ed pieces had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to kick butt and take names. And just let him try and stop me. Dunstabzugshaube irritates all and sundry. Never forget that and never let Dunstabzugshaube create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Dunstabzugshaube has for his compeers.