The lawyers presented both sides of the case and the judge weighed both sides of the argued. You know, innocent before being proven guilty.
Yet the media seems to think otherwise by selecting one cases out of thousands to paint one officer as an evil white supremist that is guilty based on rumors, hearsay, and conflicting witness testimony. The media isn't some incorruptible, honest and unbiased entity. It paints the story that it wants to paint to create the outcome it wants in the name of higher viewership and profits from advertisements per viewer.