Author Topic: Salinas California Police Department caught beating a man  (Read 10238 times)


Nobody ever says "minorities are inferior" or "I'm a tribal." But you outright lied about Brown having many arrests (specifically, dozens) prior to his death in order to justify calling him a "thug." Where did you get the idea that claim was remotely real? You assumed and made it up to make him seem like a criminal. That's tribal.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2015, 11:16:10 PM by Narkro555 »

I really have no words for you, the fact that you compare me to Riddler and a murderer is just something ridiculous and I couldn't even tell you how moronic you sound.
As I said, I compared you to Riddler because your "I'm not a tribal" argument could be used as a template for a stuffty argument. You can change "tribal" to "misogynist" or "homophobic" and it would still make sense. I compared you to a hitman because of you using "its just business" as an excuse to be a cunt.

Where do I mention anything about black people in welfare offices? The majority of welfare recipients are white.
Look at Caribou missing the point once again. The reason I brought that up is because you can only justify yourself with made-up stories and cherry picked evidence. The obvious implication in your post in a thread about minorities is that the welfare recipients you were allegedly watching were minorities, but that's not what we're talking about right now. You have enough backtracking to do right here in this thread, so let's not give you even more work.

Once again, you are making up things just like the rest of the posters, I've never said anywhere that minorities are inferior to anyone. If I were to call a criminal who is black a "thug" because of a crime he or she committed, I'd be called a tribal, which is exactly what happened numerous times to me on here. If the person was white, I doubt people would be commenting.
You are so delusional it's not even funny.

You think that the reason we all think you're tribal, the reason why you've gotten so much flak over the last few weeks, is because you called someone a thug? No. It's because you have repeatedly expressed the philosophy that every form of disadvantage, obstacle, and discrimination that minorities receive in the United States is because of their own doing. You have such a stuffty understanding of history that you have shamelessly argued that European immigrants to the United States faced the exact same struggles as African slaves and only came out on top because they were harder workers and better people.

You have never said anywhere explicitly that minorities are inferior, but anyone with half a brain can read between the lines and see that's what you really believe. We're not idiots. We know what you're implying when you're calling a rioter a 'thug', and it's not just because they're committing crimes.





« Last Edit: June 09, 2015, 11:25:53 PM by SeventhSandwich »

Nobody ever says "minorities are inferior" or "I'm a tribal." But you outright lied about Brown having many arrests (specifically, dozens) prior to his death in order to justify calling him a "thug." Where did you get the idea that claim was remotely real? You made it up to make him seem like a criminal. That's tribal.

I think that you've answered the question for me, I am not a tribal and I will stand by that because the claim is just a complete farce. I did not lie about Brown having many arrests, I got my information from Fox and at the time, I did not know that the information was not accurate. I called him a thug because he committed a criminal act - stealing several packs of cigarellos. Stealing is a criminal act. We're not talking about a can of tomato sauce here.

Also I was unaware of the term "thug" having anything to do with race, or racism. A thug to me, and according to Google is "a violent person, especially a criminal."

I did not lie about Brown having many arrests, I got my information from Fox and at the time
And that excuses the fact that you're libelously accusing someone's dead kid of being a convicted criminal? forget you.

And that excuses the fact that you're libelously accusing someone's dead kid of being a convicted criminal? forget you.
Wait this forget is caribou? That explains so much... It also makes all his post completely worthless

I did not lie about Brown having many arrests, I got my information from Fox and at the time, I did not know that the information was not accurate.
LOL
I called him a thug because he committed a criminal act - stealing several packs of cigarellos. Stealing is a criminal act. We're not talking about a can of tomato sauce here.
He arguably stole one pack, not a crate, lol. A can of tomato sauce is almost 3 bucks and some cigarillos are 5 bucks. Kinda similar in price range.

I did not lie about Brown having many arrests, I got my information from Fox and at the time, I did not know that the information was not accurate.
Did you just say "I didn't lie, I lied"

I did not lie about Brown having many arrests, I got my information from Fox and at the time, I did not know that the information was not accurate.
You stated a claim that was a complete lie and unreasonable in any imaginable situation. Just because you got it from someone else does not make it any more true nor justified, and its intended use was obvious: justify calling him a thug.

Also, stealing cigarellos is not a very violent crime. People at my rich white high school did trivial bullstuff like that all the time. Calling him a thug over one incident of shoplifting shows deliberate exaggeration.

Am I the only one who finds it hilarious how this was a thread about how the big bad media tries its very hardest to make cops look like "killers" but Cant gets his sources of information from Fox News, which seemingly exists only to put minorities in the wrong light.

Like how hard is it to see that bias.

Look at Caribou missing the point once again. The reason I brought that up is because you can only justify yourself with made-up stories and cherry picked evidence. The obvious implication in your post in a thread about minorities is that the welfare recipients you were allegedly watching were minorities, but that's not what we're talking about right now. You have enough backtracking to do right here in this thread, so let's not give you even more work.
You are so delusional it's not even funny.

It's only obvious to you, you may see things differently than others. I probably do live in a bubble compared to some of you, so there are things that I may not know. For example, I've never known that the word "thug" is associated with race. I've called criminals that in the past, and each time someone has jumped to me calling me a tribal for using that word and since then, I've never understood how that could be tribal.

You think that the reason we all think you're tribal, the reason why you've gotten so much flack over the last few weeks, is because you called someone a thug? No. It's because you have repeatedly expressed the philosophy that every form of disadvantage, obstacle, and discrimination that minorities receive in the United States is because of their own doing. You have such a stuffty understanding of history that you have shamelessly argued that European immigrants to the United States faced the exact same struggles as African slaves and only came out on top because they were harder workers and better people.

Can you show me where I've exactly said that minorities are discriminated against because of "their own doing"? I've said that many low-income people (not all) are where they are today because of choices they've made in the past, or choices that their parents made in the past. I've never said that European immigrants faced the same struggles as African American slaves (I would ask you why you aren't saying African American, rather than just African, but I'd be called a tribal for that too). I've said that when European Americans came to American, they were all mostly very poor and the majority came with nothing. It's like with many African Americans after the Civil War, most had nothing or just very little. I've never said that Europeans (or more specifically white people) worked harder than black people, let alone white people being on top of black people.

You have never said anywhere explicitly that minorities are inferior, but anyone with half a brain can read between the lines and see that's what you really believe. We're not idiots. We know what you're implying when you're calling a rioter a 'thug', and it's not just because they're committing crimes.

What are you a dog? Look, I know you're trying hard to sniff racism, but it isn't working. You can think what you want, but at this point it is becoming tedious. If I were to quote a line from Moby richard that includes the N word, I'm sure that I'd be called a tribal for that too, even though it is a piece of literature.





Communicating through quotes is the worst

And that excuses the fact that you're libelously accusing someone's dead kid of being a convicted criminal? forget you.

The level hostility you hold is unreal. I did not realize that the article I was reading did not contain accurate facts, I realize that this is something scandalous.

LOLHe arguably stole one pack, not a crate, lol. A can of tomato sauce is almost 3 bucks and some cigarillos are 5 bucks. Kinda similar in price range.

Quote
Shortly before the shooting, Brown stole several packages of cigarillos from a nearby convenience store and shoved the store clerk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Michael_Brown



You remind me of these kinds of people:



Are the big bad liberals here dismissing your fact-based arguments as racism?

Speaking of facts:
The level hostility you hold is unreal. I did not realize that the article I was reading did not contain accurate facts

Man, its Fox News. And that still doesn't justify using such a wild accusation.

It's only obvious to you, you may see things differently than others. I probably do live in a bubble compared to some of you, so there are things that I may not know. For example, I've never known that the word "thug" is associated with race. I've called criminals that in the past, and each time someone has jumped to me calling me a tribal for using that word and since then, I've never understood how that could be tribal.
The reason we think you're tribal has nothing to do with your use of the word 'thug'. If this is literally the only ignorance you wish to apologize for, then don't even bother.

Can you show me where I've exactly said that minorities are discriminated against because of "their own doing"
Why don't you start by reviewing the same thread where everyone else simultaneously came to the conclusion that you're a tribal?

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=266645.0

And if you're going to come back claiming you never, "explicitly said that they are discriminated against because of their own doing", then go ahead and give the thread another read over.

What are you a dog? Look, I know you're trying hard to sniff racism, but it isn't working. You can think what you want, but at this point it is becoming tedious. If I were to quote a line from Moby richard that includes the N word, I'm sure that I'd be called a tribal for that too, even though it is a piece of literature.
You seem to be under the impression that I'm grasping at straws for any chance to prove you a tribal. The fact of the matter is that literally everyone on the forums sees what I see. If we surveyed everyone in this thread about whether Caribou is a tribal, everyone would say yes.

Let me put it in other words: you're on the defensive here. I have literally nothing to prove to anyone anymore. I've so clearly delineated all the tribal stuff you've said that no one here would possibly disagree with me except for you. It's your job to prove you aren't a tribal, and I seriously doubt you're going to be able to do that at this point in time.