Author Topic: Which shape do YOU think is more modern?  (Read 4923 times)

that's dumb
If it was art or something then yeah but it's 3 shapes
why would you do that? It's not hurting anyone but it's effort on your part and it comes across as a little pathetic, so what are you gaining
nothing..?
i dont care if people use my pictures
most of the time when people do they dont even know who the hell "oCe" is when its referring to "oCelotus"
so
dont ask why the C is oCelotus is uppercase
its cause it is
ok

i dont care if people use my pictures
exactly
if you didn't care, you wouldn't watermark it
but since you watermarked it, obviously you do care, and want to be credited

exactly
if you didn't care, you wouldn't watermark it
but since you watermarked it, obviously you do care, and want to be credited
He must have learned it in Harvard.

It's practice for his new apple merchandise.

That's literally baby's first GD lol


The /Discuss in the image looks pretty modern

we use that in our modern forum life right?

Instead, we should all discuss what font is more modern.

Instead, we should all discuss what font is more modern.

comic sans

The Great Cubicuboctahedron


century gothic is the best modern font


I can do this I can do this!
old

modern


perfect

richardagons are by far my favorite shape..

circles given they're only theoretical, and for a long time we weren't even capable of creating anything that resembled one on a significant level. using nanotechnologies and computer modeling, it's becoming possible to make a nigh-perfect circle on the atomic level, albeit never being perfect.