Donald Annoying Orange Announces His Run for Presidency

[IkeTheGeneric]

Haha, logical fallacies, you sure got him there. :^)

Like seriously tho, ad hominem or not saying companies can't be harassed is a pretty dumb claim

From what I remember seeing personally, the people on /r/fatpeoplehate singled out images of imgur staff member images because the particular people in the images appeared overwieght

that's just stuffty

[Ad Bot]

[Kochieboy]

Golly gee someone point out one of the many facets of debate. Better jump their ass for it.

Golly gee, someone tries to use something incorrectly and heaven forbid they call them out for it. It's like we are loving hostile or something. :''''(

[Kaz]

Considering I did use it correctly, yeah you kind of are being hostile. I'm mean you're all obviously Ike's back-up, but do you boo.

[$trinick]

Considering I did use it correctly, yeah you kind of are being hostile.

Wait, what did you use correctly again?

[Kaz]

Well, you all can enjoy sitting there in a circle and jerking each other off. I'm gonna go play WoT.

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

And the first lines of that page talk about saying an argument is stupid. What's your point? I understand what you're saying but I'm not bothered enough to edit my comment.
Golly gee someone point out one of the many facets of debate. Better jump their ass for it.

He called your words stupid. And they were. Chill.

Considering I did use it correctly, yeah you kind of are being hostile. I'm mean you're all obviously Ike's back up, but do you boo.

I don't think ive actually spoken with Ike before in my life. But you keep at your victim complex i guess

Well, you all can enjoy sitting there in a circle and jerking each other off. I'm gonna go play WoT.

no come back

[$trinick]

Well, you all can enjoy sitting there in a circle and jerking each other off. I'm gonna go play WoT.

I was legitimately asking because I feel like we might be on a different page here. If you're still arguing that you correctly identified his ad hominem fallacy, then there's obviously some confusion.

This is what he said:

legit like the stupidest thing anybody has ever said

The subject of this sentence is what you said. It is being described as the stupidest thing ever said. This is by default not an ad hominem attack because he didn't say you were stupid, he said your comment was stupid.

[IkeTheGeneric]

I'm mean you're all obviously Ike's back-up, but do you boo.

I regret to inform you have just been struck by the guilt by association fairy

which is a form of ad hominem...... full circle, man O_O

[$trinick]

I regret to inform you have just been struck by the guilt by association fairy

which is a form of ad hominem...... full circle, man O_O

Ah, but now you're committing the same thing he is. He's not saying we're not credible because of our association with you, he's insulting us for our ostensible connection to you.

I understand the jest, nonetheless.

[IkeTheGeneric]

Ah, but now you're committing the same thing he is. He's not saying we're not credible because of our association with you, he's insulting us for our ostensible connection to you.

they say in order to fully understand your enemy you must become them

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

they say in order to fully understand your enemy you must become them

jesus christ lmao

[SeventhSandwich]

There are very few people who correctly call out 'ad hominem' and even fewer who actually make ad hominem attacks.

required reading:
http://laurencetennant.com/bonds/adhominem.html

[Kochieboy]

Well, you all can enjoy sitting there in a circle and jerking each other off. I'm gonna go play WoT.

[Nal]

Considering I did use it correctly, yeah you kind of are being hostile. I'm mean you're all obviously Ike's back-up, but do you boo.

Well, you all can enjoy sitting there in a circle and jerking each other off. I'm gonna go play WoT.

[$trinick]

There are very few people who correctly call out 'ad hominem' and even fewer who actually make ad hominem attacks.

Ah, but wouldn't this be a mathematical fallacy? Your conclusion is that we should read that article because there are few people who call out 'ad hominem' attacks and even fewer who make them.

By nature, there would have to be at least an equal amount of ad hominem attacks made to be able to call out correctly.