how long is your pecker? inb4 bird

[$trinick]

The connotation of the term 'girth' actually defaults to the circumference of a person's torso at the largest part.

[Ad Bot]

[·:Taboo:·]

The connotation of the term 'girth' actually defaults to the width of a person's torso at the largest part.

first i've heard of it

[Awesomebread²]

[Foxscotch]

use the word girth in a serious context and just see what happens

people do it all the time

trinick posted a weirdly in-depth study on average richard sizes; he is hell bent on asserting his mediocrity

that awkward moment when ur wrong and u gotta change the subject by mentioning something irrelevant :(

[·:Taboo:·]

people do it all the time

...where

that awkward moment when ur wrong and u gotta change the subject by mentioning something irrelevant :(

i was answering the guy's question, what are you talking about

[$trinick]

first i've heard of it

Dunno what to tell ya then. ^[1][2][3] and the object called a girth which is a band that goes around an animal's torso (usually to secure a saddle) obviously hails from this definition as well.

C'mon now, not knowing math is one thing, but this is English! Your profession! Oh wait.

[·:Taboo:·]

Dunno what to tell ya then. ^[1][2][3]

dictionary definitions aren't going to give you anything particularly informative when it comes to inappropriate slang uses of word

C'mon now, not knowing math is one thing, but this is English! Your profession! Oh wait.

the word "girth" has come zero times in any mathematics course i've ever taken
even after being run out of a thread because of it you're still trying to rely on this crutch? i can only imagine what is like to be this argumentatively challenged

[$trinick]

Ran out of a thread? I told you that you weren't worth arguing with, so I didn't engage in an argument with you. You're funny, but at this point I've made my ethical obligation to educate you and this is devolving into an argument.

[·:Taboo:·]

Ran out of a thread? I told you that you weren't worth arguing with, so I didn't engage in an argument with you.

your post was picked apart as bullstuff and this was agreed upon by following posts, but sure man, go ahead and tell yourself that you're such a big man lmao

[spideykong]

Ran out of a thread? I told you that you weren't worth arguing with, so I didn't engage in an argument with you. You're funny, but at this point I've made my ethical obligation to educate you and this is devolving into an argument.

Who crawled up your ass?

[$trinick]

*sigh*

Picked apart by who? You attempted to pick it apart, but I already told you that you have no credibility. Nobody else addressed me. I'm sorry that you're delusional, but I'm actually wasting my time right now trying to tell you why you're wrong. Stop being inflammatory to try to generate a response.

[·:Taboo:·]

You attempted to pick it apart, but I already told you that you have no credibility.

so you're just going to cover your ears and shout that you're right? yeah, that's about the response i expected lol

here, let me highlight this bit in particular for you, i know you're too scared to admit you're wrong to actually look at it yourself

My credibility was only "lost" in the eyes of morons (Hint: you). There was very little malice expressed in the thread, and for the most part people got over it immediately. As I've said before, the only time this becomes "relevant" is when idiots try to use it as a desperate card against me.

if you'd actually take a few seconds to read the thread you attempted to use to back yourself up, you would see that you are wrong
please, stop acting like a fool and saying you're so above me, at least have the dignity to admit when you're wrong

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

sorry i don't obsess over richard size enough to know the technical terms ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[$trinick]

-snip-

lmao

[·:Taboo:·]

lmao

for someone who seems so hellbent on enforcing "credibility," you sure are doing a good job of establishing that you have zero