certain people in VerticalHorizon's drama topic (AFRAIDANNA, NAL, TABOO, BDARTY)

[·:Taboo:·]

I didn't see the need to give a synopsis since anyone with basic reading comprehension skills can understand the similarity.

You're really good at completely avoiding a question. It's funny considering how frequently you like to point out when other people do that, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

Probably a good thing you aren't an English teacher.

In other words, you've been bullstuffting this entire time? You should have said so from the start, geez.

[Ad Bot]

[Bisjac]

checking back in to see if more feelings have been hurt over the internet.

was not disappointed lol

[SeventhSandwich]

You're really good at completely avoiding a question. It's funny considering how frequently you like to point out when other people do that, but I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

What do you want me to explain?

In other words, you've been bullstuffting this entire time? You should have said so from the start, geez.

That's what you gathered from that? Really?

[·:Taboo:·]

What do you want me to explain?

Boy, speaking of a lack of reading comprehension.

Where the hell is he trying to be a victim there?

That's what you gathered from that? Really?

Sorry, what higher message was I supposed to extrapolate from an attempt at a petty jab?

[Camel]

idk if this is sarcasm or not but just in case it is i wanna let u know that i was right
and he's pretty adamant about the fact that he's "not hiding who he is" so it's not even rude to post this

no i was agreeing with you, didn't intend it to be unclear

welcome back watt-son, let's see what happens.

Probably a good thing you aren't an English teacher.

it's been 4 years, for christ's sake. i'm pretty sure taboo does not agree with everything he said in 2011.

i think you're cool, sev, but i could easily dig up plenty of stuff you've said that seems kinda stupid now - not by virtue of your character, but because you were 12. cut him some slack and just debate, alright?

[spideykong]

no i was agreeing with you, didn't intend it to be unclear

welcome back watt-son, let's see what happens.
it's been 4 years, for christ's sake. i'm pretty sure taboo does not agree with everything he said in 2011.

i think you're cool, sev, but i could easily dig up plenty of stuff you've said that seems kinda stupid now - not by virtue of your character, but because you were 12. cut him some slack and just debate, alright?

Thanks I suppose camel lol. Is whatever you two fighting about even worth the argument though, like I'm not sure what's even being discussed here anymore

[SeventhSandwich]

i think you're cool, sev, but i could easily dig up plenty of stuff you've said that seems kinda stupid now - not by virtue of your character, but because you were 12. cut him some slack and just debate, alright?

To be fair, Taboo was pretty much the same age I am right now when he was pulling that stuff. What's his excuse?

Boy, speaking of a lack of reading comprehension.

He's acting like his identity as a Christian is 'under attack' because of liberals, but then badmouths transgendered people for pointing out when people blatantly discriminate against them. Like I said from the beginning, it's a hypocrisy.

[·:Taboo:·]

To be fair, Taboo was pretty much the same age I am right now when he was pulling that stuff. What's his excuse?

...being 12.

He's acting like his identity as a Christian is 'under attack' because of liberals, but then badmouths transgendered people for pointing out when people blatantly discriminate against them. Like I said from the beginning, it's a hypocrisy.

Haha, what? Maybe you're right and we're looking at different posts here. There is no mention anywhere in his post to suggest that it is "his identity as a Christian" that he is concerned about, he's simply stating how he thinks things look to be.
As he puts it himself

Nowhere did I attribute it to myself or even talk about myself in any way.

Something you ~for some reason~ skipped over in your reply to him.
Planr is incredibly misled and generally pretty dumb, but he doesn't seem like an particularly self-minded person or anything to suggest that this was in any way hypocritical.

Still gotta wonder

what higher message was I supposed to extrapolate from an attempt at a petty jab?

Unless you're just going to dance around that for a page or two as well.

[SeventhSandwich]

Haha, what? Maybe you're right and we're looking at different posts here. There is no mention anywhere in his post to suggest that it is "his identity as a Christian" that he is concerned about, he's simply stating how he thinks things look to be.

So I suppose it's just a coincidence that he's complaining about the victimization of Christians as a fundamentalist, hardcore Christian. There's definitely no way that he's attributing that to himself. 

Unless you're just going to dance around that for a page or two as well.

I fail to see why bringing up your stuffty antics counts as me admitting to 'bullstuffting you'. That just doesn't make any sense at all.

[·:Taboo:·]

So I suppose it's just a coincidence that he's complaining about the victimization of Christians as a fundamentalist, hardcore Christian. There's definitely no way that he's attributing that to himself.

I can complain about American issues without worrying about how they directly affect me. I can complain about local issues without applying them to myself. This is not an complicated or even unusual concept, and it's really silly that I apparently have to explain this to you.

I fail to see why bringing up your stuffty antics counts as me admitting to 'bullstuffting you'. That just doesn't make any sense at all.

"stuffty antics" that are entirely irrelevant. Hey, you remember that year or so period where all you did was post links to yourlogicalfallacyis.com instead of actually discussing anything? Yeah.
I have yet to see anyone bring irrelevant things from literally years ago in a situation that wasn't essentially being backed into a corner by their own stupidity. So far, this is holding true.

[$trinick]

Guys, guys. I don't know why you guys are arguing. You see, there's this cool thing called credibility. It's essentially a measure of a person's worthiness to discuss with.

Here's the issue: Taboo has none. There is literally no reason to argue with him, because his words carry no weight. He lost his credibility at the ripe age of sixteen (source, not 12 as previously claimed) and since has done absolutely nothing to get it back. Since he has no credibility, arguing with him is like arguing with a child.

[·:Taboo:·]

Guys, guys. I don't know why you guys are arguing. You see, there's this cool thing called credibility. It's essentially a measure of a person's worthiness to discuss with.
Here's the issue: Taboo has none. There is literally no reason to argue with him, because his words carry no weight. He lost his credibility at the ripe age of sixteen (source, not 12 as previously claimed) and since has done absolutely nothing to get it back. Since he has no credibility, arguing with him is like arguing with a child.

This legitimately made me laugh.

• Attempting to factor in "credibility" to what is basically boils down to someone being objectively wrong and then shouting that he's not makes no sense. If an insane person tells you that 2+2 is 4, 2+2 is still 4.
• My credibility was only "lost" in the eyes of morons (Hint: you). There was very little malice expressed in the thread, and for the most part people got over it immediately. As I've said before, the only time this becomes "relevant" is when idiots try to use it as a desperate card against me.
• I was 15 (not 16) when I was ~ousted~. Apparently I was 12 when I registered, ie. when I started up with that lie.
  

[spideykong]

I'm sure one or more of those fallacy's apply to Taboo in a way

[Yosher]

i honestly have no idea what this argument is even about now

[spideykong]

i honestly have no idea what this argument is even about now

Thinking the exact same thing lol