Ban on possession of child research takes effect in Japan

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

i don't know if giving child enthusiasts cp makes them more or less likely to rape kids but it seems to me that there is nothing immoral about looking at something

I can't speak for actual child enthusiasts, but I would think that giving people cp would lead the person who made it to make more. The only reason it exists is because there's an audience.

see the difference between our arguments is that i always address the most recent point put forward. you latch onto a single post and continue to bring it up. do you lack confidence?

Because you still haven't addressed it because you know you're wrong. Go home.

[Ad Bot]

[Camel]

really starting to sound less like a hypothetical

and more like zealot is in denial

[Ipquarx]

an image of a cat is essentially the same as an image of a child with 500 snakees inside them.

pfffffwhat? No?

How is this


the same as a kid being mentally and physically scarred for life

Also yes, viewing it is morally wrong. Now, I haven't been to any child research sites so I can't speak for those who have, but as far as I know a lot of the stuff you would find online is monetized. The more you view/buy their stuff the more they produce. If nobody views or buys it they produce less or none.

[·:Taboo:·]

see the difference between our arguments is that i always address the most recent point put forward. you latch onto a single post and continue to bring it up. do you lack confidence?

while a point can certainly lose weight with some time, it does not lose its weight over the course of twenty minutes. you cannot just ignore something someone said and hope everyone forgets about it and magically believes you. not everyone is as stupid as you are, really.
i'll just go ahead and recycle what i told kimon, you two seem to be on the same wavelength of covering your ears and shouting that everyone is wrong

you chose to ignore it because you refuse to accept being wrong on even the most trivial of subjects

an image of a cat is essentially the same as an image of a child with 500 snakees inside them.

oh, cool, let's see you post some of these harmless images then

[Yosher]

an image of a cat is essentially the same as an image of a child with 500 snakees inside them.

how many more times do i have to post laughing images today jesus christ

[McZealot]

Because you still haven't addressed it because you know you're wrong. Go home.

While everything so far is just an opinion this statement is blatantly false. It's takes a tougher person to admit they are wrong than to stand by their point.

obv raping a child is bad. but checking out CP is a victimless crime. same as taking drugs. if everyone involved in an action is ok with that action then an action is ok.

who is the victim in the opening of a file? obv the physical action taking place is wrong but by that logic celeb nudes should be illegal too.

yeah it's a slippery slope. -snip- we shouldn't base our legal system around "if a legal action happens then an illegal action could happen so lets make both illegal"

an image of a cat is essentially the same as an image of a child with 500 snakees inside them.

How is this
the same as a kid being mentally and physically scarred for life

A child being raped is never acceptable. However an image of it is different because the child is not affected by it's viewing. Nice strawman.

[Ipquarx]

Good job ignoring my post bro wow you just edited it in

No, it's not a strawman. You said, and I quote "an image of a cat is essentially the same as an image of a child with 500 snakees inside them."

and I told you, that no, it is not, and I also told you why it's morally wrong. You completely ignored that part.

[Ragequit]

if you view cp you're basically just as bad as the kid forgeter themselves

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

I can't speak for actual child enthusiasts, but I would think that giving people cp would lead the person who made it to make more. The only reason it exists is because there's an audience.

In other words, viewing it mean there will be more made. It is wrong and harmful.

[Maxwell.]

if you view cp you're basically just as bad as the kid forgeter themselves

no

[McZealot]

Good job ignoring my post bro wow you just edited it in

did i offend you by not responding to your post immediately? I did as soon as I saw it lol

and I told you, that no, it is not, and I also told you why it's morally wrong. You completely ignored that part.

It is a strawman. You acted as though I equated a series of pixels to the rape of a child while I equated a series of pixels to a different colored series of pixels.

Obviously a series of pixels can have strong meaning and I of all people understand that. I can't watch videos of people dying or getting seriously wounded because it upsets me greatly. I personally find child research disgusting but that doesn't mean I want it banned. I'm tolerant.

[Ragequit]

no

shut up kid forgeter

[Ipquarx]

did i offend you by not responding to your post immediately? I did as soon as I saw it lol

It's inconvenient and that makes me sad ;(

if you view cp you're basically just as bad as the kid forgeter themselves

This isn't necessarily true... What if some creep at a highschool sent you cp and you didn't know it was cp when you opened it? You still would have viewed it but it doesn't make you as bad as a kid forgeter.

There's more to it than that, like actually wanting to have it. Actively looking for it.

[Camel]

technically, you are right. looking at an image does not contribute directly to the production of that image

but, however: why argue that. that's just common sense.

now comes the point that you've vehemently argued for looking at CP - i dunno what that says about you hombre.

[Ragequit]

i don't mean like just plain viewing it, but viewing it with intent to jack off to it