...a word that triggers a reaction, obviously?
the key word was "connotation." i didn't figure it was necessary to elaborate on what "trigger" could possibly connote other than what it usually does in this context so i didn't, his response would make it clear, which is why i requested clarification. if you aren't aware or are pretending to not be aware for the sake of debate: people often parody the idea of "triggers" when making fun of sjws, and so i'm a bit afraid he was implying that the idea of equality for women is some kind of radical sjw nonsense. spelling it out explicitly sounds stupid as seen in the preceding sentences and so i did not do it
edit for elaboration:
i didn't want to have a kneejerk reaction and assume he was implicitly dismissing feminism as some sjw circlejerk, so i requested some additional explanation.
Feminism is pretty stupid -Don't shoot me yet- in this place called The Western Civilization. Feminism just isn't even needed in places like the US. We got over this issue in the 50s - 60s.
we got over certain major
de jure issues relating to loveual discrimination. there are still existing
de facto (though the term doesn't fit as well here) social inequalities that are the centre of feminism in western culture today.