Poll

answer

Yes
47 (42.3%)
No
48 (43.2%)
:(
16 (14.4%)

Total Members Voted: 111

Author Topic: is this avatar gonna get me banned  (Read 4875 times)

So mute/deaf people can't forget without it being rape according to that logic.

Yes, raping a dog is animal abuse and do go on about it giving you consent because dogs can't do that
I don't know what drug lord runs your part of the country, but at least in first world countries consent is verbal, conscious recognition between consenting adult humans.
Stop giving him attention

unfortunately, probably no
So mute/deaf people can't forget without it being rape according to that logic.
they can both communicate effectively

With body language, the same way any animal can communicate.

With body language, the same way any animal can communicate.
an animal can not actually communicate with a person

i only needed to read the first two posts on this page to understand the entirety of this topic and i'm assuming i need not know any more

bestiality isn't super-cool to most people and that's not changing; consent is typically only considered valid between creatures capable of fully understanding the choice they are making, which we do not consider to be the case for any other living species, because they cannot understand complex interpersonal human relationships or loveual contact past their basic mental function to reproduce and possibly enjoy getting their genitals stimulated

it's not in the permission being given as much as it is in the ability to fully understand the decision whilst making it, which is why paedophilia is also a problem.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2015, 06:05:14 PM by otto-san »

All you guys are doing is arguing that a dog cannot legally consent. Big deal, laws aren't exaclty solid foundations for mortal choices. The holocost and slavery were perfectly legal. Yeah, a dog may want to have love and doing so wouldnt exactly be morally wrong. Pie Crust may not be a rapist, just a twisted pervert. So stop using the whole consent argument cause it's a stupid one.

i'm not personally talking about law as much as i am the rationale behind the law

morality is subjective, but we can at least try to reach understanding of what the ideas in play are

I'm fairly certain it's common sense to not rape a dog

All you guys are doing is arguing that a dog cannot legally consent. Big deal, laws aren't exaclty solid foundations for mortal choices.
Not all but most laws reflect a common ground for morals that the majority population shares
The holocost and slavery were perfectly legal.
nice comparisons
Pie Crust may not be a rapist, just a twisted pervert. So stop using the whole consent argument cause it's a stupid one.
The consent argument is a perfectly valid argument even in regards to an animal?

If you don't know if something is willing to let you forget it then just don't forget it? It goes beyond being a pervert to being mentally unstable.

OP is a mean butt and we should all not like him!

I'm fairly certain it's common sense to not rape a dog
its common sense to not act handicapped too but you have trouble following that

its common sense to not act handicapped too but you have trouble following that
I am not handicapped
But I have made a discovery
Maybe everyone in Argentina is put under a curse that makes them rape animals. Maybe we have been blind all this time. We need to stop shipping animals to Argentina before it's too late. I just cracked the secret code as to why pie crust rapes animals

Um, FYI, animals get shipped from Argentina and F3D323 is also from here but not a zoophile...

I am not handicapped
But I have made a discovery
Maybe everyone in Argentina is put under a curse that makes them rape animals. Maybe we have been blind all this time. We need to stop shipping animals to Argentina before it's too late. I just cracked the secret code as to why pie crust rapes animals
What about F3d323