Poll

USA USA USA

Joe Biden
Lincoln Chafee
Hillary "willcryifbecomespresident" Clinton
Martin O'Malley
Bernie Sanders
Jim Webb
Jeb Bush
Dr. Ben Carson
Chris Christie
Ted Cruz
Carly Fiorina
Jim Gilmore
Lindsey Graham
Mike Huckabee
Bobby Jindal
John Kasich
George Pataki
Rand Paul (Donald Annoying Orange's Arch Nemesis
Marc Rubio
Rick Santorum
Big Mouth (you know who this is)

Author Topic: POLL: Who do you want to be USA's New President?  (Read 3015 times)

Pretty sure this intel business is capped off because amd doesn't make enough money to compete and obtaining a x86 license is extremely loving hard.

I'm not socialist, I just hate paying through the nose to buy basic loving hardware and standard-issue broadband.


Changing the free market isn't going to magically make things cheaper.

but if they want to keep making money they need access to an educated and skilled workforce.

Not really. Why do you think so many countries manufacture their stuff in China now?

yes also more college education means the workforce is more skilled

The more people who have those skills the less companies will need people with those skills.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2015, 06:04:10 PM by beachbum111111 »

The more people who have those skills the less companies will need people with those skills.
And you know that how? What economist can you cite who claims that?

Not really. Why do you think so many countries manufacture their stuff in China now?
Yes, the manufacturing is done in oppressed stuff holes because the labor is cheap and human rights violations are easy to get away with. Who do you think is buying those products? Who is designing the products being manufactured and the factories and equipment used to produce them?

the problem is
where do the guidelines start

To start, by preventing companies from purposely not providing their service in the area that their main competitor are mainly so they don't have to compete on the market. Or by having more clear guidelines on preventing company mergers that allow one entity to control an entire industry.


Changing the free market isn't going to magically make things cheaper.

If you're going to ignore my point, I'm going to ignore your posts. Intel purposely prevents people from competing with them, and uses the factor that they aren't in direct competition with anyone besides AMD to inflate the price of their hardware. Preventing them from doing this will make their hardware "magically" cheaper.

Changing the free market isn't going to magically make things cheaper.

Not really. Why do you think so many countries manufacture their stuff in China now?

The more people who have those skills the less companies will need people with those skills.
they manufacture in china because its cheap
manufacturing in china consists of an assembly line
not a skilled workforce

The more people who have those skills the less companies will need people with those skills.

...you don't know why there is a current unemployment issue, do you?


And you know that how?

Think about it. More people will have the same degree's such as computer science for example, after the companies hire the people they need they won't exactly need to hire extra people with those degrees. It just leaves the rest of the people with those degrees still searching for a job.



More people will have the same degree's such as computer science for example, after the companies hire the people they need they won't exactly need to hire extra people with those degrees. It just leaves the rest of the people with those degrees still searching for a job.

The only difference between that and now is that those people with degrees searching for jobs aren't also in crippling debt from student fees...

I seriously see nothing bad coming from more people having free degrees on the market

Think about it. More people will have the same degree's such as computer science for example, after the companies hire the people they need they won't exactly need to hire extra people with those degrees. It just leaves the rest of the people with those degrees still searching for a job.


At which point the market will likely expand to fill the role of job creation or stagnate, and people will begin seeking career paths in more viable fields. This applies to every degree/career not just computer science.

Technology is a highly skilled field that likely won't even see the problems that say an English degree has, because STEM degrees are what drive new research, products, and ways of doing things to create new markets.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2015, 06:14:01 PM by Otis Da HousKat »

Think about it. More people will have the same degree's such as computer science for example, after the companies hire the people they need they won't exactly need to hire extra people with those degrees. It just leaves the rest of the people with those degrees still searching for a job.
I have thought about it. I've also read about it. What I know is that making education more available increases economic growth, leading to job creation. It shifts the economy away from the unstable/low-skilled industries like manufacturing, and towards a higher skilled knowledge economy. If you want me to find sources and will actually read them, I will get them.

dilma rousseff muahahahahah

Changing the free market isn't going to magically make things cheaper.
Yeah, that's typically not the point of changing the free market, we want to encourage competition by making sure that companies can't use their gigantic financial clout to drive competitors out of the market. Things becoming cheaper is a side effect, what people would like more is if giant companies had incentive to innovate and compete instead of just driving smaller guys out of business or just absorbing them whole.

That, and the U.S. doesn't even have a completely free market in the first place, there are government subsidies, regulations, and etc. that pretty much throw out the notion of a completely free market out the window. You know what you get with a free market? Monopolies.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2015, 06:19:52 PM by Operator¹ »

That, and the U.S. doesn't even have a completely free market in the first place, there are government subsidies, regulations, and etc. that pretty much throw out the notion of a completely free market out the window. You know what you get with a free market? Monopolies.
This is a really great point. Essentially nobody believes in a completely free market, there is always government intervention. A purely free market would be terrible for everyone.