Author Topic: I Probally just did the most forgeted up thing one can do at a party.  (Read 3955 times)

>tough
>5 lbs

M8 I can bench 20 and I don't even workout
if you didn't get it, it was a joke


I would classify something like Tylenol to be a first party substance because it's recognized by the Food and Drug Administration, something like bleach or marijuana no.
Does anyone else besides yourself use this classification system?

Does anyone else besides yourself use this classification system?

I'm not quite sure, you'd have to check for yourself. However, I'll tell you that it does make some sense to an extent.

However, I'll tell you that it does make some sense to an extent.
i have 0 idea how that makes sense
maybe because im not on the far end of the autism spectrum, but your class system makes no sense.

I'm not quite sure, you'd have to check for yourself. However, I'll tell you that it does make some sense to an extent.
I don't really think it does. First party (as far as I'm aware) almost always denotes something you're involved in yourself, except you're saying that first party substances are those recognised (..recognised as what?) by the FDA (do you work for the FDA?).

i have 0 idea how that makes sense
maybe because im not on the far end of the autism spectrum, but your class system makes no sense.

I think your way of diagnosing others is pretty poor, I'll admit. I don't think using a term not officially recognized would be an indicator of Autism.

I don't really think it does. First party (as far as I'm aware) almost always denotes something you're involved in yourself, except you're saying that first party substances are those recognised (..recognised as what?) by the FDA (do you work for the FDA?).

My good friend Daswiruch has a great response to this (pasted from PM):

"yes, third party substances can be a legitimate term because they are normally made of someone who is not legally involved in the production of the pharmaceutical drugs created by actual companies and licensed under the fda

think of it like video game producers: first party is straight from them or their team, third party is from an outside source
"

I think there is some legitimacy behind the unofficial term. Whether you can see it or not, I have no control over though.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2015, 12:12:22 AM by Bear_Tracks »

snip
Both alcohol and tobacco products are regulated by the FDA, but you said they were third party?

Better start fleshing out your classification system a bit better because right now it doesn't actually make sense

it was consensual
Passing out or even being drunk to the point that you are near passing out is altered mental status, meaning proper consent cannot be given, meaning you raped her.

Good job, rapist.

Passing out or even being drunk to the point that you are near passing out is altered mental status, meaning proper consent cannot be given, meaning you raped her.

Good job, rapist.

I agree. Having love with someone who is high or drug is rape, mostly because that person's ability to think is completely inhibited because of whatever substance they're on.  It's taking advantage to the maximum and it's contextually rape.

I've drunk raped my girlfriend tons of times 8)

I've drunk raped my girlfriend tons of times 8)

I don't think this is something to joke around about.

I don't think this is something to joke around about.
It's OK because she has drunk raped me as well.

I agree. Having love with someone who is high or drug is rape

depends on how drunk/high they are and whether they're both drunk/high or not because you can't rape each other at the same time that's handicapped
« Last Edit: December 13, 2015, 01:14:38 AM by Electrk. »