i have 0 idea how that makes sense
maybe because im not on the far end of the autism spectrum, but your class system makes no sense.
I think your way of diagnosing others is pretty poor, I'll admit. I don't think using a term not officially recognized would be an indicator of Autism.
I don't really think it does. First party (as far as I'm aware) almost always denotes something you're involved in yourself, except you're saying that first party substances are those recognised (..recognised as what?) by the FDA (do you work for the FDA?).
My good friend Daswiruch has a great response to this (pasted from PM):
"yes, third party substances can be a legitimate term because they are normally made of someone who is not legally involved in the production of the pharmaceutical drugs created by actual companies and licensed under the fda
think of it like video game producers: first party is straight from them or their team, third party is from an outside source
"
I think there is some legitimacy behind the unofficial term. Whether you can see it or not, I have no control over though.