Nickpb, child enthusiast/Child Predator, overall useless piece of stuff

[kahnuu]

Evidence suggests that Nickpb believed that both girls were 18>

I'm not saying I believe it hand over fist considering the posting of the ass ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

What ''evidence''? There has been NO evidence of that matter whatsoever.

no, it's okay because it's okay. there being a law against it doesn't make it morally wrong. gay love used to be illegal... but I'm sure your parents told you that was bad toomy parents would probably disagree with me, but either way it has nothing to do with them. I just don't think people should be blamed for stuff that's not their fault. super weird, right?do you mean what I'm saying about the legality of it? because no I'm not. distributing lewd pictures of minors is against federal law, regardless of whether or not you're the person in the pictures. you can go to jail for it. and you may be required to register as a love offender

nice opinions fellas

[Ad Bot]

[Khaz°]

do you enjoy being hardheaded

[Foxscotch]

Evidence suggests that Nickpb believed that both girls were 18>

well, no, he knew bubba was 16. but that doesn't matter. that's fine. the problem there is that he shared it

[Jubel]

do you enjoy being hardheaded

gotta love the moral highhorse

or at least thats my opinion

[IkeTheGeneric]

What ''evidence''? There has been NO evidence of that matter whatsoever.

Furthermore, that girl told everyone she was 19. She just flat out did. We only found out that she was 15 within the last week, so totally not his fault.

She's saying that, under the guise of her being 19, they consensually loveted. Why is that so horrible?

I am sorry for doing such a thing but again I(everyone on bl aswell) was under the impression that she was 19

Oh and Nick just told me he thought she was 19 at the time they "loveted."

Take personal accounts with a grain of salt but multiple people confirming the same thing and an apology from nick is their side of the story

well, no, he knew bubba was 16. but that doesn't matter. that's fine. the problem there is that he shared it

Yeah, isn't that stuff usually covered by the romeo and juliet law?

[Jubel]

Take personal accounts with a grain of salt but multiple people confirming the same thing and an apology from nick is their side of the story

probably means nothing due to khanuus stupidly big hate boner for nick

[Foxscotch]

gotta love the moral highhorse

despite the fact that khaz was talking about kahnu, I'm pretty sure you're talking about me. so I guess the newest arguing tactic is to just say the other person is on a "moral highhorse"?

Yeah, isn't that stuff usually covered by the romeo and juliet law?

if they had love, it would probably be covered by the age of consent alone, because in many states that's 16. where it isn't, it's probably legal within that age range anyway
but they didn't have love. it was a picture. which is against federal law, and they don't care how old the recipient is

[Jubel]

despite the fact that khaz was talking about kahnu, I'm pretty sure you're talking about me. so I guess the newest arguing tactic is to just say the other person is on a "moral highhorse"?

i mean khanu
you're fine i have nothing against you i love you

[IkeTheGeneric]

if they had love, it would probably be covered by the age of consent alone, because in many states that's 16. where it isn't, it's probably legal within that age range anyway
but they didn't have love. it was a picture. which is against federal law, and they don't care how old the recipient is

Yeah I just looked it up, I was misremembering the law, sorry.

[kahnuu]

''evidence'' is not a group of people saying something happened

you're the hard headed one khaz

how the forget do you expect me to believe you

[IkeTheGeneric]

how the forget do you expect me to believe you

I don't really care if you believe or not I was just reiterating their side of the story

[Khaz°]

''evidence'' is not a group of people saying something happened

you're the hard headed one khaz

how the forget do you expect me to believe you

it doesn't affect me whether or not you believe me

you're the only out of 20 pages that's making a big deal out of it

[Mr. Bones]

no, it's okay because it's okay. there being a law against it doesn't make it morally wrong. gay love used to be illegal... but I'm sure your parents told you that was bad toomy parents would probably disagree with me, but either way it has nothing to do with them. I just don't think people should be blamed for stuff that's not their fault. super weird, right?do you mean what I'm saying about the legality of it? because no I'm not. distributing lewd pictures of minors is against federal law, regardless of whether or not you're the person in the pictures. you can go to jail for it. and you may be required to register as a love offender

She sent the picture though, it is partly her fault whether you want to accept that or not.

The point he's trying to make is that legality =/= morality. Being illegal does not imply immoral, being legal does not imply moral. You can't base an argument on that.

Yeah it kinda does?  In our society it's pretty forgeted up to be loveually interacting with minors, I don't know what society you live in where this is okay.

[sir dooble]

Yeah, isn't that stuff usually covered by the romeo and juliet law?

*shrug*
Lemme go rewatch transformers and I'll get back to you.

[Jubel]

it's pretty forgeted up to be loveually interacting with minors, I don't know what society you live in where this is okay.

my boyfriend was a year older than me and i was a minor for a little while
we shared nudes and we even had love

holy forget god has come to reap the sinners this is the way the world ends and my palms are covered in hair